IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2018i1p54-60.html

Influence of Demographics on Employees’ Perception for Cross-Selling and Up-Selling of eBanking Services

Author

Listed:
  • Neha GUPTA

    (K. J. Somaiya Institute of Management Studies & Research, Mumbai, India)

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to understand the influence of demographic variables on employee’s perception for cross-selling of banking products and services for Indian Public Sector Banks. The demographic variables such as respondent’s age, qualification and annual income have been studied in relation to the customers’ buying pattern through cross-selling and up-selling for banking products and services. The size of the sample was of 810 respondents. The results reveal that the technology has high impact on customers buying pattern for banking products and service. 82.3% respondents found information about bank’s products and services while surfing from one page to another on bank’s website. 42% respondents received the information about bank’s products and services in reply messages. The age group 26 to 59 years is majorly stimulated by Cross-selling and up-selling. The study found that identification of influence of demographic variables will enable the banks to provide customized offerings to right and potential customers. The results are based on SPSS analysis using cross-tabs and Chi-square testing

Suggested Citation

  • Neha GUPTA, 2018. "Influence of Demographics on Employees’ Perception for Cross-Selling and Up-Selling of eBanking Services," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 54-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2018:i:1:p:54-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2018_1/Gupta.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsung-Chi Liu & Li-Wei Wu, 2009. "Cross-buying evaluations in the retail banking industry," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 903-922, July.
    2. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    3. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    4. Verhoef, P.C. & Donkers, A.C.D., 2001. "Predicting Customer Potential Value: an application in the insurance industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-01-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajeev Kumra & Praveen Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Mediating role of trust in the impact of perceived empathy and customer orientation on intention to continue relationship in Indian banks," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 372-386, December.
    2. Pratibha A. Dabholkar & Xiaojing Sheng, 2011. "Consumer participation in using online recommendation agents: effects on satisfaction, trust, and purchase intentions," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 1433-1449, September.
    3. Aaron J. Enriquez & Kevin Berry & Maria Fernandez & Nichar Gregory & Kacey C. Ernst & Mary H. Hayden & Maria Diuk-Wasser, 2025. "Simple Stated Preference Questions Can Enhance Transdisciplinary Projects: Linking Perceived Risks With Willingness to Spray and Pay," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(1), pages 81-124, January.
    4. Kim, Miyea & Oh, Joohyun & Kim, Beomsoo, 2021. "Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Min, Dong-Jun & Cunha, Marcus, 2019. "The influence of horizontal and vertical product attribute information on decision making under risk: The role of perceived competence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 174-183.
    6. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek & Christina Kyprianou & Marten Risius, 2020. "How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1490-1527, August.
    7. Claudia Bobâlcă, 2014. "Determinants Of Customer Loyalty. A Theoretical Approach," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 8(1), pages 995-1005.
    8. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    9. Hassan Eskandari & Samad Aali & Ali Behrouz Heris, 2017. "The Impact of Relationship Marketing Tactics and Dimensions of the Relationship Quality on Customer Loyalty," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 1, pages 1-13.
    10. Anjali Singh & Ajay Kumar, 2021. "Designing the marketspace for millennials: fun, functionality or risk?," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(4), pages 311-327, December.
    11. Siran Wang & Qiang Yan & Lingli Wang, 2025. "Task-oriented vs. social-oriented: chatbot communication styles in electronic commerce service recovery," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1793-1825, June.
    12. Raggiotto, Francesco & Scarpi, Daniele & Mason, Michela C., 2019. "Faster! More! Better! Drivers of upgrading among participants in extreme sports events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-11.
    13. MinJae Lee & JinKyu Lee, 2012. "The impact of information security failure on customer behaviors: A study on a large-scale hacking incident on the internet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 375-393, April.
    14. Theo Notteboom & Sedat Baştuğ & Fevzi Bitiktaş & Ercan Akan & Funda A. Yercan, 2024. "Influencer marketing in B2B services: a holistic approach for the container shipping industry," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(4), pages 545-571, December.
    15. Rajat Kumar Behera & Pradip Kumar Bala & Arghya Ray, 2024. "Cognitive Chatbot for Personalised Contextual Customer Service: Behind the Scene and beyond the Hype," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 899-919, June.
    16. Trinh Le Tan & Khanh Nguyen Chau Ngoc & Hien Le Thi Thanh & Hoai Nguyen Thi Thu & Uyen Vo Truong Hoang, 2024. "Enhancing Repurchase Intention on Digital Platforms Based on Shopping Well-Being Through Shopping Value, Trust and Impulsive Buying," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    17. Lee, Liane W.Y. & Tang, Yiming & Yip, Leslie S.C. & Sharma, Piyush, 2018. "Managing customer relationships in the emerging markets – guanxi as a driver of Chinese customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 356-365.
    18. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    19. Necati Ertekin & Anupam Agrawal, 2021. "How Does a Return Period Policy Change Affect Multichannel Retailer Profitability?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 210-229, 1-2.
    20. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2018:i:1:p:54-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.