IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v32y2016i06p1434-1482_00.html

A Flexible Nonparametric Test For Conditional Independence

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Meng
  • Sun, Yixiao
  • White, Halbert

Abstract

This paper proposes a nonparametric test for conditional independence that is easy to implement, yet powerful in the sense that it is consistent and achieves n −1/2 local power. The test statistic is based on an estimator of the topological “distance” between restricted and unrestricted probability measures corresponding to conditional independence or its absence. The distance is evaluated using a family of Generically Comprehensively Revealing (GCR) functions, such as the exponential or logistic functions, which are indexed by nuisance parameters. The use of GCR functions makes the test able to detect any deviation from the null. We use a kernel smoothing method when estimating the distance. An integrated conditional moment (ICM) test statistic based on these estimates is obtained by integrating out the nuisance parameters. We simulate the critical values using a conditional simulation approach. Monte Carlo experiments show that the test performs well in finite samples. As an application, we test an implication of the key assumption of unconfoundedness in the context of estimating the returns to schooling.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Meng & Sun, Yixiao & White, Halbert, 2016. "A Flexible Nonparametric Test For Conditional Independence," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(6), pages 1434-1482, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:32:y:2016:i:06:p:1434-1482_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466615000286/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Huang, Ta-Cheng & Xu, Haiqing, 2023. "Testing For Unobserved Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With Observational Data," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 582-622, June.
    2. Hoderlein, Stefan & Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert & Yang, Thomas Tao, 2016. "Testing for monotonicity in unobservables under unconfoundedness," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 183-202.
    3. Young Jun Lee & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Testing for the presence of measurement error in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(2), pages 382-404, June.
    4. Daniel Wilhelm, 2018. "Testing for the presence of measurement error," CeMMAP working papers CWP45/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Testing conditional independence via empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 27-44.
    6. Lu, Xun & White, Habert, 2015. "Testing For Treatment Dependence Of Effects Of A Continuous Treatment," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(5), pages 1016-1053, October.
    7. Xiaojun Song & Jichao Yuan, 2026. "A Projection Approach to Nonparametric Significance and Conditional Independence Testing," Papers 2602.15289, arXiv.org.
    8. Elia Lapenta, 2022. "A Bootstrap Specification Test for Semiparametric Models with Generated Regressors," Papers 2212.11112, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    9. Wang, Hongfei & Liu, Binghui & Feng, Long & Ma, Yanyuan, 2024. "Rank-based max-sum tests for mutual independence of high-dimensional random vectors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    10. Su, Liangjun & Zheng, Xin, 2017. "A martingale-difference-divergence-based test for specification," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 162-167.
    11. Xiaojun Song & Haoyu Wei, 2021. "Nonparametric Tests of Conditional Independence for Time Series," Papers 2110.04847, arXiv.org.
    12. Lu, Xun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Testing for separability in structural equations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 14-26.
    13. Xuehu Zhu & Jun Lu & Jun Zhang & Lixing Zhu, 2021. "Testing for conditional independence: A groupwise dimension reduction‐based adaptive‐to‐model approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 549-576, June.
    14. Ai, Chunrong & Sun, Li-Hsien & Zhang, Zheng & Zhu, Liping, 2024. "Testing unconditional and conditional independence via mutual information," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:32:y:2016:i:06:p:1434-1482_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.