IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v9y1989i1p107-131.html

The Multifiber Arrangement and the Management of International Textile Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Grennes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Grennes, 1989. "The Multifiber Arrangement and the Management of International Textile Trade," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 107-131, Spring/Su.
    • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:107-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1989/5/cj9n1-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Trela & John Whalley, 1988. "Do Developing Countries Lose From the MFA?," NBER Working Papers 2618, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. James E. Anderson, 1988. "The Relative Inefficiency of Quotas," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262511789, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paggi, Mechel S., 2003. "Trade Policy Developments Affecting Cotton," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2003 33214, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Conway & Marco Fugazza & M. Kerem Yuksel, 2013. "TURKISH ENTERPRISE-LEVEL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN TRADE LIBERALIZATION: The Removal of Agreements on Textiles and Clothing Quotas," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 59, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    2. Krishna, Kala & Erzan, Refik & Tan, Ling Hui, 1994. "Rent Sharing in the Multi-fibre Arrangement: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Apparel Imports from Hong Kong," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 62-73, February.
    3. Henk Kox, 2001. "Exposure of the business services industry to international competition," CPB Document 10.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Nuno Limão & Patricia Tovar, 2018. "Policy choice: Theory and evidence from commitment via international trade agreements," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Policy Externalities and International Trade Agreements, chapter 6, pages 179-198, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. William Kaempfer & Thomas Willett, 1989. "Combining rent-seeking and public choice theory in the analysis of tariffs versus quotas," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 79-86, October.
    6. Barbara Hutniczak & Niels Vestergaard & Dale Squires, 2019. "Policy Change Anticipation in the Buyback Context," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(1), pages 111-132, May.
    7. James Harrigan & Geoffrey Barrows, 2009. "Testing the Theory of Trade Policy: Evidence from the Abrupt End of the Multifiber Arrangement," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(2), pages 282-294, May.
    8. Robert C. Feenstra, 1992. "How Costly Is Protectionism?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 159-178, Summer.
    9. William H. Kaempfer & Edward Tower & Thomas D. Willett, 1989. "Performance Contingent Protection," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 261-275, November.
    10. Hillman, Jimmye S., 1996. "Nontariff Agricultural Trade Barriers Revisited," Working Papers 14602, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. Collie, David R. & Su, Yu-Tien, 1998. "Trade policy and product variety: when is a VER superior to a tariff?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 249-255, February.
    12. Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2007. "Politique Commerciale, Qualité et Environnement: une Application aux Négociations Commerciales entre l’Union Européenne et le Mercosur," MPRA Paper 12640, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. de Melo, Jaime & Winters, L Alan, 1990. "Voluntary Export Restraints and Resource Allocation in Exporting Countries," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 4(2), pages 209-233, May.
    14. Kala Krishna & Ling Hui Tan, 1992. "License Price Paths: I. Theory II. Evidence from Hong Kong," NBER Working Papers 4237, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Robert C. Feenstra, 1989. "Auctioning U.S. Import Quotas, Foreign Response, and Alternative Policies," NBER Working Papers 2839, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. James E. Anderson & J. Peter Neary, 1996. "A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 63(1), pages 107-125.
    17. Peter Walkenhorst, 2004. "Liberalising Trade in Textiles and Clothing: A Survey of Quantitative Studies," International Trade 0401007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kilkenny, Maureen, "undated". "The "30-30-30 Proposal": CGE Simulation of Unilateral Compliance by the USA to Partial Trade Liberalization," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271354, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Merle Holden, 2005. "The Economics Of Import Parity Pricing: A Pedagogical Note," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 73(3), pages 357-362, September.
    20. James E. Anderson, 1991. "The Coefficient of Trade Utilization: The Cheese Case," NBER Chapters, in: Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy, pages 221-244, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:9:y:1989:i:1:p:107-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.