IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpn/umkcjf/v8y2019i2p25-47.html

The Impact Of Intangible Factors On Profitability: Evidence From Corporations Traded At Muscat Securities Market In Oman

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Onder Kaymaz
  • Ilker Yilmaz
  • Ozgur Kaymaz

    (Clarion University, United States
    Dhofar University, Oman
    Turkish Airlines, Turkey)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to determine whether corporate financial performance may be influenced from intangible assets owned by a company and some special incurring expenditures benefiting the intangible value of the company even though such items could also be technically expensed contrary to getting capitalized. Combining the intangibles reported on the corporate balance sheets with the expenditures such as R&D, staff and advertising expenses, a variable called Calculated Value of Intangible Factors (CVIF) is specifically generated and is examined as to whether intangibles alone might potentially have a significant effect on corporate profitability ratios, and if so to what extent. The sample consists of non-financial public companies traded at Muscat Securities Market in Oman and the sampling period covers the time window from 2013 until 2017. Two regressors are used to capture the effect of intangible factors; meaning CVIF and CVIF/Total Assets (CVIFTA) respectively, the latter of which is a relative measure. Four (4) profitability measures, namely Gross Profit Margin (GPM), EBIT Margin (EBITM), Net Profit Margin (NPM) and Return on Assets (ROA) are developed as proxies to indicate for corporate financial performance. Considering all the resulting eight (8) models each, panel data regression analyses are performed separately to specifically document the linkage between corporate intangibles and corporate financial performance. Results provide a strong evidence by showing that intangibles do have a significant and a positive effect on corporate financial performance, except when ROA is regressed by CVIFTA rather than CVIF. This effect on and the linkage with financial performance is documented to be the most robust once GPM and NPM are to indicate the performance in the forms of CVIF and CVIFTA respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Onder Kaymaz & Ilker Yilmaz & Ozgur Kaymaz, 2019. "The Impact Of Intangible Factors On Profitability: Evidence From Corporations Traded At Muscat Securities Market In Oman," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(2), pages 25-47.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpn:umkcjf:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:25-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJFA/article/view/CJFA.2019.007/18430
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tânia Cristina CHIARELLO & Caroline Sulzbach PLETSCH & Alini DA SILVA & Tarcísio Pedro DA SILVA, 2014. "Financial Performance, Intangible Assets And Value Creation Of Brazilian And Chilian Companies Of Information Technology," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 23(4), pages 73-88.
    2. Hanran Li & Wenshu Wang, 2014. "Impact of Intangible Assets on Profitability of Hong Kong Listed Information Technology Companies," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 98-113, December.
    3. Yasean A. Tahat & Ahmed H. Ahmed & Mohammad M. Alhadab, 2018. "The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1147-1168, May.
    4. Beccalli, Elena, 2007. "Does IT investment improve bank performance? Evidence from Europe," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2205-2230, July.
    5. Adriana Tiron Tudor & Ştefana Dima (Cristea) & Bogdan Dima & Raluca Valeria Raţiu, 2014. "The Linkage Between Intangibles And Profitability," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(16), pages 1-25.
    6. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    7. Nathan Chappell & Adam Jaffe, 2018. "Intangible Investment and Firm Performance," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 52(4), pages 509-559, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioniţă Cătălin Gabriel, 2022. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: How Innovation Strategies Impact Firm Performance and Competitive Advantage," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 31-46, August.
    2. Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw & Albert Danso & Linda Hickson, 2022. "Growth opportunity and investment policy: The role of managerial incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3634-3646, December.
    3. He, Qiuqin & Guijarro-Garcia, Maria & Costa-Climent, Juan, 2022. "Impact of knowledge-based capital on firm productivity: The contingent effect of ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 85-94.
    4. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    5. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    6. Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler, 2026. "Short and medium-term effects of intangible capital on firm growth: firm-level evidence from austrian microdata," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 53(1), pages 113-148, February.
    7. Gangopadhyay, Partha & Jain, Siddharth & Bakry, Walid, 2022. "In search of a rational foundation for the massive IT boom in the Australian banking industry: Can the IT boom really drive relationship banking?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    9. Tom Vanacker & Veroniek Collewaert & Ine Paeleman, 2013. "The Relationship between Slack Resources and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of Venture Capital and Angel Investors," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 1070-1096, September.
    10. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    11. Changhyun Kim & Richard A. Bettis, 2014. "Cash is surprisingly valuable as a strategic asset," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(13), pages 2053-2063, December.
    12. Metin Ocak & Alperen Ozturk, 2018. "The Role of Transformational Leadership Behaviours’ Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship Behaviours and Financial Performance of Firms," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 45-55.
    13. Dongil D. Keum, 2020. "Cog in the wheel: Resource release and the scope of interdependencies in corporate adjustment activities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 175-197, February.
    14. S J Ho & S K Mallick, 2010. "The impact of information technology on the banking industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(2), pages 211-221, February.
    15. Roth, Felix & Sen, Ali & Rammer, Christian, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Firm-Level Productivity – Evidence from Germany," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 9, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    16. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    17. Diaz-Di­az, Nieves Lidia & Aguiar-Di­az, Inmaculada & De Saá-Pérez, Petra, 2008. "The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: The innovative choice in Spanish firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1515-1529, October.
    18. Tarziján, Jorge & Brahm, Francisco & Daiber, Luis Felipe, 2008. "Entrepreneurial profitability and persistence: Chile versus the U.S.A," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 599-608, June.
    19. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    20. Wang, Xiaoying & Sadiq, Ramla & Khan, Tahseen Mohsan & Wang, Rong, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and intellectual capital in the age of FinTech," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpn:umkcjf:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:25-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Miroslawa Buczynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.wydawnictwoumk.pl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.