IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000549/019252.html

Plan para desarrollar redes de vinculación y gestión en Instituciones de I&D en Salud: estudio de caso

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Roberto Vega-González; Roberto Misael Vega-Salinas
  • Roberto Misael Vega-Salinas

Abstract

En este artículo se presenta el caso del Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN) de la Secretaría de Salud del Gobierno Federal Mexicano, en el cual se realiza Investigación y Desarrollo (I&D) en Medicina Genómica. La vinculación del instituto ha sido tradicionalmente académica y de investigación. En el marco de tiempos de cambios internos y externos muy intensos, y considerando el esquema de austeridad económica planteada por el actual Gobierno, se requiere implementar acciones para mejorar su vinculación con el fin de propiciar la generación de nuevos proyectos y de ingresos externos en un esquema de gestión moderno. Para encontrar la propuesta de acciones que pudieran responder a esta necesidad, se propuso el desarrollo de un plan estratégico basado en el establecimiento de redes de innovación tecnológica. La metodología de planeación estratégica utilizada consistió en las siguientes etapas: (a) un diagnóstico para determinar la situación de referencia, (b) planteamiento de las condiciones para realizar la planeación, (c) la elaboración de un plan normativo para llegar a la situación futura esperada y (d) el desarrollo de un plan táctico con acciones de corto, mediano y largo plazo. En conclusión, en el plan propuesto para incentivar, mejorar y sistematizar las acciones de gestión de proyectos y vinculación con la sociedad se encontró que se requiere de dos acciones fundamentales: (a) construir comunidades o redes de innovación con instituciones nacionales e internacionales públicas y privadas y (b) llevar a cabo un mayor acercamiento y contacto directo con el público usando unidades móviles y módulos itinerantes para llevar servicios de medicina genómica directamente a distintas zonas de la Ciudad de México y su área conurbada.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Roberto Vega-González; Roberto Misael Vega-Salinas & Roberto Misael Vega-Salinas, 2020. "Plan para desarrollar redes de vinculación y gestión en Instituciones de I&D en Salud: estudio de caso," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000549:019252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1504
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark de Rond & Hamid Bouchikhi, 2004. "On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 56-69, February.
    2. Bing Wu & Chunyu Gong, 2019. "Impact of Open Innovation Communities on Enterprise Innovation Performance: A System Dynamics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Paolo E Giordani & Francesco Rullani & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2018. "Endogenous growth of open collaborative innovation communities: a supply-side perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(4), pages 745-762.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsang, Eric W.K. & Colpan, Asli M., 2025. "Reconciling the tension between contextualization and generalization in qualitative international business research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).
    2. Latusek, Dominika & Vlaar, Paul W.L., 2018. "Uncertainty in interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of trust: A qualitative study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 12-27.
    3. Francesco Virili & Cristiano Ghiringhelli, 2021. "Uncertainty and Emerging Tensions in Organizational Change: A Grounded Theory Study on the Orchestrating Role of the Change Leader," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2019. "Navigating tensions in a cross‐sector social partnership: How a convener drives change for sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 317-329, March.
    5. Max J. Ringlstetter & Benjamin Klein & Björn Schäfer, 2014. "Interorganisationale Kooperationsfähigkeit in der Praxis — Zentraler Baustein zur Sicherung der Zukunftsfähigkeit von Unternehmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(68), pages 123-146, January.
    6. Seale, Darryl A. & Arend, Richard J. & Phelan, Steven, 2006. "Modeling alliance activity: Opportunity cost effects and manipulations in an iterated prisoner's dilemma with exit option," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 60-75, May.
    7. Müller, Dirk, 2010. "Alliance Coordination, Dysfunctions, and the Protection of Idiosyncratic Knowledge in Strategic Learning Alliances," EconStor Preprints 41039, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Isidora Kourti, 2015. "Achieving Collaborative Aims through Multiple Identity Construction: Managing a public inter-organizational collaboration," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 5(1-2), pages 1-15, January-J.
    9. Anna R.S. Swärd & Ragnhild Kvålshaugen & Lena E. Bygballe, 2023. "Unpacking the Duality of Control and Trust in Inter‐Organizational Relationships through Action‐Reaction Cycles," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(8), pages 2091-2124, December.
    10. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.
    11. Yeh, Chien Chi & Ku, Edward C.S. & Ho, Ching Hua, 2016. "Collaborating pivotal suppliers: Complementarities, flexibility, and standard communication between airline companies and travel agencies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 92-101.
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0240547 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Luis Roberto Vega Gonz¨¢lez & Crescencio Garc¨ªa Segundo, 2019. "Building Productive Collaborations: Creation of A Technological Research and Development Unit (UIDT) of the ICAT in the General Hospital of Mexico," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 76-89, March.
    14. Jiang, Xu & Li, Yuan & Gao, Shanxing, 2008. "The stability of strategic alliances: Characteristics, factors and stages," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 173-189, June.
    15. Arne Keller & Fabrice Lumineau & Thomas Mellewigt & Africa Ariño, 2021. "Alliance Governance Mechanisms in the Face of Disruption," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1542-1570, November.
    16. Wolfgang Hora & Johanna Gast & Norbert Kailer & Andrea Rey-Marti & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2018. "David and Goliath: causes and effects of coopetition between start-ups and corporates," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 411-439, March.
    17. Moshe Farjoun & Peer C. Fiss, 2022. "Thriving on contradiction: Toward a dialectical alternative to fit‐based models in strategy (and beyond)," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 340-369, February.
    18. Mourad Hannachi & François Coléno, 2016. "Towards a managerial engineering of coopetition," Post-Print hal-01242333, HAL.
    19. Raza-Ullah, Tatbeeq & Bengtsson, Maria & Gnyawali, Devi R., 2020. "The nature, consequences, and management of emotions in interfirm paradoxical relationships—A conceptual framework," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    20. J. Nils Foege & Erk P. Piening & Torsten-Oliver Salge, 2017. "Don’T Get Caught On The Wrong Foot: A Resource-Based Perspective On Imitation Threats In Innovation Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-42, April.
    21. Kourti, Isidora, 2017. "Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners’ interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 93-101.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000549:019252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feitmco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.