IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/021331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passive privatization and financial crisis of public higher education in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Hernando Portillo Riascos

    (Universidad de Nariño)

Abstract

Introduction: This article examines the challenges posed by the current funding scheme for public universities in Colombia, where there is a clear contradiction between the growing needs of these institutions and the budget allocated by the State for their operation. Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects generated as a consequence of the passive privatization strategy implemented through Law 30 of 1992. Methodology: The research approach is quantitative, with a descriptive scope. Methodologically, two dimensions are addressed: management and financing indicators. The analysis period spans from 1993 to 2022. The data used mainly comes from databases and reports published by the Ministry of Education. Results: As a result of this research, it was found that, despite the increase in educational coverage over the last three decades, the funding for public universities has been inadequate. Moreover, it was noted that the state’s strategy for providing educational services progressively favored demand-side subsidies at the expense of transfers to public institutions. Conclusions: This situation threatens the sustainability of these institutions while leading to a noticeable deterioration in the quality of service provision. Introducción: Este artículo examina la problemática que supone el actual esquema de financiamiento de las universidades públicas colombianas, en el cual se observa la evidente contradicción entre las crecientes necesidades de dichas instituciones y el presupuesto asignado por el Estado para su funcionamiento. Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio es analizar los efectos generados como consecuencia de la estrategia de privatización pasiva implementada a partir de la Ley 30 de 1992. Metodología: El enfoque de investigación utilizado es de naturaleza cuantitativa, con un alcance descriptivo. Desde el punto de vista metodológico, se abordan dos dimensiones: indicadores de gestión y de financiamiento. El periodo de análisis comprende de 1993 a 2022. La información utilizada proviene fundamentalmente de las bases de datos e informes publicados por el Ministerio de Educación. Resultados: Como resultado de esta investigación, se encontró que, a pesar del incremento de la cobertura educativa durante las últimas tres décadas, el financiamiento de las universidades públicas ha sido precario. Además, se advirtió que la apuesta estatal para la prestación del servicio educativo privilegió progresivamente los subsidios a la demanda, en detrimento de las transferencias hacia las instituciones públicas. Conclusiones: Esta situación amenaza la sostenibilidad de este tipo de instituciones, a la vez que provoca un deterioro manifiesto de las condiciones de calidad en la prestación del servicio. Introdução: Este artigo examina o problema apresentado pelo atual esquema de financiamento das universidades públicas colombianas, no qual se observa a evidente contradição entre as necessidades crescentes dessas instituições e o orçamento alocado pelo Estado para seu funcionamento. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é analisar os efeitos gerados como consequência da estratégia de privatização passiva implementada desde a Lei 30 de 1992. Metodologia: A abordagem de pesquisa utilizada é de natureza quantitativa, com escopo descritivo. Do ponto de vista metodológico, são abordadas duas dimensões: indicadores de gestão e de financiamento. O período de análise é de 1993 a 2022. As informações utilizadas provêm principalmente de bancos de dados e relatórios publicados pelo Ministério da Educação. Resultados: Como resultado dessa pesquisa, constatou-se que, apesar do aumento da cobertura educacional nas últimas três décadas, o financiamento das universidades públicas tem sido precário. Além disso, observou-se que o compromisso do Estado com a prestação de serviços educacionais favoreceu progressivamente os subsídios à demanda, em detrimento das transferências às instituições públicas. Conclusões: Essa situação ame

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Hernando Portillo Riascos, 2025. "Passive privatization and financial crisis of public higher education in Colombia," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 26(01), pages 29-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:021331
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.252601.264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/9251
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.252601.264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    2. Chapman, Bruce, 2006. "Income Contingent Loans for Higher Education: International Reforms," Handbook of the Economics of Education, in: Erik Hanushek & F. Welch (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 25, pages 1435-1503, Elsevier.
    3. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Funke, Michael & Strulik, Holger, 2000. "On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 491-515, March.
    2. Nicolai J. Foss, 2012. "Linking Ethics and Economic Growth: a Comment on Hunt," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 6(3), September.
    3. Boikos, Spyridon & Bucci, Alberto & Stengos, Thanasis, 2013. "Non-monotonicity of fertility in human capital accumulation and economic growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 44-59.
    4. Kholeka Mdingi & Sin-Yu Ho, 2023. "Income inequality and economic growth: An empirical investigation in South Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 2230027-223, June.
    5. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Raffaello Bronzini & Paolo Piselli, 2006. "Determinants of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 597, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo & Martínez-Vázquez, Jorge & Vulovic, Violeta, 2013. "Taxation and Economic Growth in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4583, Inter-American Development Bank.
    9. Antonio Ciccone & Giovanni Peri & Douglas Almond, "undated". "Capital, Wages, and Growth: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers 152, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    10. Dragoljub Stojanov, 2011. "Mr. Keynes, Mr. Roosevelt i Vlada RH Zašto RH teško (ne)može promjeniti razvojnu paradigmu," Ekonomija Economics, Rifin d.o.o., vol. 18(2), pages 329-342.
    11. Carine Nourry, 2012. "Dasgupta, D.: Modern growth theory," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 97-100, January.
    12. Glaeser, Edward L & Hedi D. Kallal & Jose A. Scheinkman & Andrei Shleifer, 1992. "Growth in Cities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(6), pages 1126-1152, December.
      • Edward L. Glaeser & Hedi D. Kallal & Jose A. Scheinkman & Andrei Shleifer, 1991. "Growth in Cities," NBER Working Papers 3787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Glaeser, Edward Ludwig & Kallal, Hedi D. & Scheinkman, Jose A. & Shleifer, Andrei, 1992. "Growth in Cities," Scholarly Articles 3451309, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    13. Buesa, Mikel & Heijs, Joost & Baumert, Thomas, 2010. "The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 722-735, July.
    14. Orlando Gomes, 2005. "Knowledge creation and technology difusion: a framework to understand economic growth," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 20(2), pages 41-61, December.
    15. Benjamin Montmartin & Nadine Massard, 2015. "Is Financial Support For Private R&D Always Justified? A Discussion Based On The Literature On Growth," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 479-505, July.
    16. Minh Quang Dao, 2012. "Government expenditure and growth in developing countries," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(1), pages 77-82, January.
    17. Gibogwe, Vincent & Nigo, Ayine & Kufuor, Karen, 2022. "Institutional Quality And Economic Growth In Tanzania," MPRA Paper 115400, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka Wirajing & Tii N. Nchofoung & Roger Tsafack Nanfosso, 2024. "Inclusive education and labour productivity: The case of Sub‐Saharan African countries," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 92(4), pages 498-523, December.
    19. V. V. Chari & Patrick J. Kehoe & Ellen R. McGrattan, 1996. "The Poverty of Nations: A Quantitative Exploration," NBER Working Papers 5414, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:021331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.