IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v10y2022i3p307-318.html

Space and Interaction in Civil Society Organizations: An Exploratory Study in a US City

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Baggetta

    (Paul H. O’Neill School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, USA)

  • Brad R. Fulton

    (Paul H. O’Neill School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, USA)

  • Zoe Caplan

    (Department of Sociology, Indiana University, USA)

Abstract

Civil society organizations (CSOs) are sites for creating and strengthening social ties among participants. Ties are developed when participants in CSO convenings (meetings, events, activities) interact, but convenings vary in the amount of interaction they generate. Theory and research suggest that the physical spaces where convenings occur may impact participant interaction. However, previous methods lack sufficient scale to formally test related hypotheses. We introduce a method for collecting data at scale to examine how CSO convening spaces influence social interaction. The method—systematic social observation (SSO)—assembles comparable, quantitative data from many CSO convenings. As part of an exploratory study, we collected data from 99 CSO convenings from three organizations in Indianapolis, Indiana. For illustrative purposes, building on theories of spatial propinquity and configuration, we highlight two dimensions of spatial variation in CSO convenings—footprint and permeability—and examine how they relate to three indicators of participant interaction. Our findings suggest that controlling for the number of participants and other convening characteristics, medium‐sized spaces foster more interaction than small or large ones. More broadly, this study demonstrates the viability of the SSO method for collecting data at scale and provides a model for future work on space, interaction, and networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Baggetta & Brad R. Fulton & Zoe Caplan, 2022. "Space and Interaction in Civil Society Organizations: An Exploratory Study in a US City," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 307-318.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:307-318
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v10i3.5308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v10i3.5308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alba Angelucci, 2019. "Spaces of Urban Citizenship: Two European Examples from Milan and Rotterdam," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 131-140.
    2. Bennett, Robert J., 2011. "Local Business Voice: The History of Chambers of Commerce in Britain, Ireland, and Revolutionary America, 1760-2011," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199584734.
    3. Baggetta, Matthew & Han, Hahrie & Lim, Chaeyoon & Andrews, Kenneth T. & Ganz, Marshall Louis, 2010. "Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work," Scholarly Articles 8065966, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Toker, Umut & Gray, Denis O., 2008. "Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 309-329, March.
    5. Jamie O'Brien & Laura García Vélez & Martin Zaltz Austwick, 2017. "Visualizing the Impacts of Movement Infrastructures on Social Inclusion: Graph-Based Methods for Observing Community Formations in Contrasting Geographic Contexts," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 132-146.
    6. Jamie O'Brien & Laura García Vélez & Martin Zaltz Austwick, 2017. "Visualizing the Impacts of Movement Infrastructures on Social Inclusion: Graph-Based Methods for Observing Community Formations in Contrasting Geographic Contexts," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 132-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gil Viry & Christoph van Dülmen & Marion Maisonobe & Andreas Klärner, 2022. "On the Role of Space, Place, and Social Networks in Social Participation," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 217-220.
    2. Gil Viry & Christoph van Dülmen & Marion Maisonobe & Andreas Klärner, 2022. "On the Role of Space, Place, and Social Networks in Social Participation," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 217-220.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Baggetta & Brad R. Fulton & Zoe Caplan, 2022. "Space and Interaction in Civil Society Organizations: An Exploratory Study in a US City," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 307-318.
    2. Miguel Serra & Sophia Psarra & Jamie O'Brien, 2018. "Social and Physical Characterization of Urban Contexts: Techniques and Methods for Quantification, Classification and Purposive Sampling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 58-74.
    3. Janet Stanley & John Stanley, 2017. "The Importance of Transport for Social Inclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 108-115.
    4. Geoffrey Henderson & Matto Mildenberger & Leah C. Stokes, 2025. "The effect of environmental voter mobilization on voter turnout and environmental attitudes: evidence from a field experiment in British Columbia, Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(6), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Matthew Baggetta & David M. Bredenkamp, 2021. "Systematic Social Observation in the Study of Civil Society Organizations," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(4), pages 1694-1724, November.
    6. Jonathan S. Coley & Jessica Schachle, 2021. "Growing the Green Giant: Ecological Threats, Political Threats, and U.S. Membership in Sierra Club, 1892–Present," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Edward J. Balleisen, 2017. "American Better Business Bureaus, the Truth-in-Advertising Movement, and the Complexities of Legitimizing Business Self-Regulation over the Long Term," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 42-53.
    8. Verma Prikshat & Parth Patel & Sanjeev Kumar & Suraksha Gupta & Ashish Malik, 2024. "Role of Socio-Cultural Capital and Country-Level Affluence in Ethical Consumerism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 697-711, May.
    9. Andrew Dilley, 2013. "The politics of Imperial commerce: The Congress of Chambers of Commerce of the Empire, 1886-1914," Working Papers 13008, Economic History Society.
    10. Ponomariov, Branco L. & Boardman, P. Craig, 2010. "Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 613-624, June.
    11. Hoffer, Rewert, 2021. "Is the business of business business alone? The International Chamber of Commerce and the origins of global business diplomacy, 1920-1931," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112961, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Annette Kämpf-Dern & Mascha Will-Zocholl, 2022. "Transforming workplaces into performing workspaces—Holistic evaluation concept for managing workspace change projects," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 189-211, October.
    13. Matthew M. Mars & Hope Jensen Schau, 2017. "Institutional entrepreneurship and the negotiation and blending of multiple logics in the Southern Arizona local food system," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 407-422, June.
    14. Craig Boardman & Barry Bozeman, 2015. "Academic faculty as intellectual property in university-industry research alliances," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 403-420, July.
    15. Oluremi B Ayoko & Neal M Ashkanasy, 2020. "The physical environment of office work: Future open plan offices," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 488-506, August.
    16. Helen Hintjens & Rachel Kurian, 2019. "Enacting Citizenship and the Right to the City: Towards Inclusion through Deepening Democracy?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 71-78.
    17. Robert Newbery & Johannes Sauer & Matthew Gorton & Jeremy Phillipson & Jane Atterton, 2013. "Determinants of the Performance of Business Associations in Rural Settlements in the United Kingdom: An Analysis of Members' Satisfaction and Willingness-to-Pay for Association Survival," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 967-985, April.
    18. Migliore, Alessandra & Rossi-Lamastra, Cristina & Tagliaro, Chiara, 2025. "Home vs office: Does workspace design influence where academics conduct their research?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(7).
    19. Edward J. Balleisen, 2017. "American Better Business Bureaus, the Truth-in-Advertising Movement, and the Complexities of Legitimizing Business Self-Regulation over the Long Term," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 42-53.
    20. Craig Boardman & Denis Gray, 2010. "The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 445-459, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v10:y:2022:i:3:p:307-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.