IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i6p189-d561324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growing the Green Giant: Ecological Threats, Political Threats, and U.S. Membership in Sierra Club, 1892–Present

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan S. Coley

    (Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Jessica Schachle

    (Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

Abstract

A growing body of research examines questions related to the emergence of environmental organizations and the growth of the environmental organizational field in the United States, but we need to know more about why particular environmental organizations grow or decline in terms of membership size over time. In this article, we draw on both qualitative and quantitative data to assess factors contributing to the growth of the Sierra Club, one of the United States’ oldest and largest environmental organizations. First, through an analytic narrative that synthesizes insights from secondary accounts of the history of the Sierra Club, we identify a variety of ecological and political threats that have led to growth in the Sierra Club from its founding in 1892 to the present day. Then, through time-series analyses of quantitative data, we show that two particular types of environmental and political threats—growth in carbon dioxide emissions and the presence of Republican Presidents—have led to growth in the Sierra Club from 1960 (when it began mass recruitment of members) to 2016. We contextualize these findings within the broader social scientific literature on neoliberalism and its consequences for environmental degradation and environmental mobilization. Overall, our findings provide support for threat-based models of mobilization and hold significant implications for research on environmental organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan S. Coley & Jessica Schachle, 2021. "Growing the Green Giant: Ecological Threats, Political Threats, and U.S. Membership in Sierra Club, 1892–Present," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:189-:d:561324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Weikmans & Harro van Asselt & J. Timmons Roberts, 2020. "Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un)likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions (NDCs)," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 511-526, April.
    2. Baggetta, Matthew & Han, Hahrie & Lim, Chaeyoon & Andrews, Kenneth T. & Ganz, Marshall Louis, 2010. "Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work," Scholarly Articles 8065966, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Elliott & Steven Bernstein & Matthew Hoffmann, 2022. "Credibility dilemmas under the Paris agreement: explaining fossil fuel subsidy reform references in INDCs," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 735-759, December.
    2. Matthew Baggetta & Brad R. Fulton & Zoe Caplan, 2022. "Space and Interaction in Civil Society Organizations: An Exploratory Study in a US City," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 307-318.
    3. Emília Inês Come Zebra & Gilberto Mahumane & Federico Antonio Canu & Ana Cardoso, 2021. "Assessing the Greenhouse Gas Impact of a Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariff Policy in Mozambique: Towards NDC Ambition and Recommendations to Effectively Measure, Report, and Verify Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Matthew M. Mars & Hope Jensen Schau, 2017. "Institutional entrepreneurship and the negotiation and blending of multiple logics in the Southern Arizona local food system," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 407-422, June.
    5. Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2021. "The European Green Deal: What Prospects for Governing Climate Change With Policy Monitoring?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 370-379.
    6. Hertel, Christina & Binder, Julia & Fauchart, Emmanuelle, 2021. "Getting more from many—A framework of community resourcefulness in new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:189-:d:561324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.