IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v70y2017i18p25-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Deutschlandrente: Ein Konzept zur Stärkung der kapitalgedeckten Altersvorsorge

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Knabe
  • Joachim Weimann

Abstract

Der demographische Wandel stellt die deutsche Rentenpolitik vor große Herausforderungen. Mit dem Renten­eintritt der Babyboomer-Generation werden immer mehr Rentenempfänger immer weniger Beitragszahlern gegenüberstehen. Um die Lasten gleichmäßiger auf die verschiedenen Generationen zu verteilen, wurde mit der Riester-Reform beschlossen, das Niveau der gesetzlichen, umlagefinanzierten Rentenversicherung zu reduzieren und den Aufbau zusätzlicher, kapitalgedeckter Altersvorsorge zu stärken. Allerdings bleibt die Verbreitung der betrieblichen und privaten Altersvorsorge deutlich hinter den ursprünglichen Erwartungen zurück. Andreas Knabe und Joachim Weimann, Universität Magdeburg, legen dar, wie mit der Deutschlandrente die private Altersvorsorge gestärkt werden kann. Der Status quo wird so verändert, dass jeder, der nicht aktiv widerspricht, erst einmal über eine zusätzliche Altersvorsorge verfügt. Alle Beschäftigten werden hierzu über ihre Arbeitgeber automatisch in die betriebliche oder private Altersvorsorge einbezogen. Da es den Arbeitnehmern jederzeit möglich ist, die zusätzliche Vorsorge einzustellen, wird ihre Entscheidungsfreiheit nicht eingeschränkt.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Knabe & Joachim Weimann, 2017. "Die Deutschlandrente: Ein Konzept zur Stärkung der kapitalgedeckten Altersvorsorge," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(18), pages 25-33, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:18:p:25-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/sd-2017-18-knabe-weimann-deutschlandrente-2017-09-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Beshears & James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte C. Madrian, 2009. "The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes: Evidence from the United States," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment, pages 167-195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Gasche, Martin & Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Haupt, Marlene & Angstmann, Simon, 2013. "Die Kosten der Riester-Rente im Vergleich," MEA discussion paper series 201304, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    3. Johannes Geyer & Viktor Steiner, 2009. "Zahl der Riester-Renten steigt sprunghaft: aber Geringverdiener halten sich noch zurück," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 76(32), pages 534-541.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    5. Iglesias, Augusto & Palacios, Robert J., 2000. "Managing public pension reserves - Part I : evidence from the international experience," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 21311, The World Bank.
    6. Eric M. Engen & William G. Gale & John Karl Scholz, 1996. "The Illusory Effects of Saving Incentives on Saving," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 113-138, Fall.
    7. Giacomo Corneo & Matthias Keese & Carsten Schröder, 2009. "The Riester Scheme and Private Savings: An Empirical Analysis based on the German SOEP," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 129(2), pages 321-332.
    8. Raj Chetty & John N. Friedman & Søren Leth-Petersen & Torben Heien Nielsen & Tore Olsen, 2014. "Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 129(3), pages 1141-1219.
    9. B. Douglas Bernheim & Andrey Fradkin & Igor Popov, 2015. "The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(9), pages 2798-2837, September.
    10. Haupt, Marlene & Kluth, Sebastian, 2013. "Take a chance on me – Can the Swedish premium pension serve as a role model for Germany’s Riester scheme?," MEA discussion paper series 201301, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    11. Brigitte C. Madrian & Dennis F. Shea, 2001. "The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 116(4), pages 1149-1187.
    12. Kornelia Hagen & Axel Kleinlein, 2011. "Zehn Jahre Riester-Rente: kein Grund zum Feiern," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(47), pages 3-14.
    13. Marlene Haupt & Aysel Yollu-Tok, 2014. "Ergänzende Altersvorsorge: Akzeptanz, Vertrauen und Ausgestaltung aus Verbrauchersicht," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(3), pages 19-39.
    14. Eric M. Engen & William G. Gale & John Karl Scholz, 1994. "Do Saving Incentives Work?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 25(1), pages 85-180.
    15. Michela Coppola & Martin Gasche, 2011. "Die Riester-Förderung — Mangelnde Information als Verbreitungshemmnis," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 91(11), pages 792-799, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clemens Fuest & Christa Hainz & Volker Meier & Martin Werding & Giacomo Corneo & Hans Peter Grüner & Dennis Huchzermeier & Bert Rürup & Andreas Knabe & Joachim Weimann & Christine Bortenlänger & Donat, 2019. "Staatsfonds für eine effiziente Altersvorsorge: Welche innovativen Lösungen sind möglich?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(14), pages 03-24, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Altersvorsorge; Private Altersvorsorge; Kapitaldeckungsverfahren; Rentenfinanzierung; Rentenpolitik; Rentenreform; Deutschland;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:18:p:25-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.