IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v70y2024i3id329-2023-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of agricultural carbon emissions reduction potential and optimisation pathways based on a framework of equity and efficiency principles: Evidence from Fujian Province in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Ye

    (College of Business, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, P. R. China
    Private Economic Development Research Institute of Characteristic New Think Tank for Universities in Fujian Province, Quanzhou, P. R. China)

  • Renshan Xie

    (Quanzhou Rural Revitalization Group, Quanzhou, China)

  • Xingwei Deng

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou, P. R. China)

  • Minling Lin

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou, P. R. China)

  • Yang Chen

    (Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou, P. R. China)

  • Ketao Lin

    (College of Resource and Environment Sciences, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, P. R. China)

  • Jianzhou Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, P. R. China)

Abstract

Fujian Province, China was chosen as the study area for estimating the marginal agricultural abatement costs within the province based on data for 2010-2020. The study employed these estimations as a pivotal factor affecting the efficiency of carbon emissions reduction, constructed an index model to gauge the potential of agricultural carbon emissions reduction, and delved into the urban agricultural carbon emissions reduction potential from the perspectives of economic development rights (equity) and carbon emissions reduction difficulty (efficiency). Our findings indicated a marked regional disparity in the marginal abatement costs of agriculture across Fujian Province, with the highest recorded at EUR 1.3771 × 108 per 104 tonnes and the lowest at EUR 0.6526 × 108 per 104 tonnes, albeit demonstrating general upward inter-annual trends. Furthermore, the assessment of agricultural carbon emissions reduction potential, grounded in the principles of equity and efficiency, revealed four distinct developmental tiers. Resource allocation pathways for carbon emissions reduction were subsequently delineated, informed by the stratification of high- and low-carbon emissions reduction potential indices alongside typological characteristics. The outcomes of this study offer strategic guidance to the government of Fujian Province in crafting suitable carbon emissions reduction strategies and in devising targeted action plans aimed at achieving the twin goals of 'carbon peaking' and 'carbon neutrality'.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Ye & Renshan Xie & Xingwei Deng & Minling Lin & Yang Chen & Ketao Lin & Jianzhou Yang, 2024. "Assessment of agricultural carbon emissions reduction potential and optimisation pathways based on a framework of equity and efficiency principles: Evidence from Fujian Province in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 125-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:3:id:329-2023-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/329/2023-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/329/2023-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/329/2023-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/329/2023-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:3:id:329-2023-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.