IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/brccej/v7y2022i4p63-69.html

Quantifying The Sustainability Of The Wine Sector Through Life Cycle Assessment (Lca)

Author

Listed:
  • Larisa BUGAIAN

    (Technical University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova)

  • Cristina DIACONU

    (Technical University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova)

Abstract

At present, the economy of the Republic of Moldova is largely linear. Although there are circular initiatives, a very small share of waste and by-products is reintegrated into the economy. The new strategic framework of the Republic of Moldova provides for the increase of sustainable practices, from which can be listed: National Development Strategy "Moldova 2030", Moldova-EU Association Agreement, New Association Agenda for 2021-2027, Environment Strategy 2030. They focus on the prevention and management of waste, which is intended to drive economic growth and environmental responsibility. It’s certain that the industry has a key role to play in making specific commitments on sustainable production and cooperation along value chains. In this regard, companies need to reconsider their current business models by adopting resource-efficient production. Actually, substantial amounts of resources such as secondary raw materials are transformed into waste, reaching landfills. Only the national wine industry annually generates about 60 thousand tons of by-products, most of which remain unrecovered. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the resulting waste / by-products throughout the value chain and to quantify the sustainability of the wine sector by using the LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Larisa BUGAIAN & Cristina DIACONU, 2022. "Quantifying The Sustainability Of The Wine Sector Through Life Cycle Assessment (Lca)," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 7(4), pages 63-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:63-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revec.ro/papers/220410.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina DIACONU & Larisa BUGAIAN, 2021. "Valorization Of Winery Waste. Case Of The Republic Of Moldova," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 16(26), pages 54-62, June.
    2. Kramer, Klaas Jan & Moll, Henri C. & Nonhebel, Sanderine & Wilting, Harry C., 1999. "Greenhouse gas emissions related to Dutch food consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 203-216, April.
    3. Lauran Van Oers & Jeroen Guinée, 2016. "The Abiotic Depletion Potential: Background, Updates, and Future," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Sergi Maicas & José Juan Mateo, 2020. "Sustainability of Wine Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayla Amamou & Safa Chabouh & Lilia Sidhom & Alaeddine Zouari & Abdelkader Mami, 2025. "Agri-Food Supply Chain Sustainability Indicators from a Multi-Capital Perspective: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Pachauri, Shonali, 2004. "An analysis of cross-sectional variations in total household energy requirements in India using micro survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 1723-1735, October.
    3. Hong, Gui-Bing & Ma, Chih-Ming & Chen, Hua-Wei & Chuang, Kai-Jen & Chang, Chang-Tang & Su, Te-Li, 2011. "Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3063-3068.
    4. Bozzoli, Leonardo & Cipolletta, Mariasole & Dal Pozzo, Alessandro & Nucci, Carlo Alberto & Cozzani, Valerio, 2025. "Assessing the environmental sustainability of alternative design concepts for transmission systems of offshore renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    5. Vesela Serafimova, 2021. "Methods And Methodology For Analysis And Assessment Of Competitiveness Of Wine Producing Enterprises," Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 9(2), pages 113-120.
    6. Corey Allan & Suzi Kerr & Campbell Will, 2015. "Are we turning a brighter shade of green? The relationship between household characteristics and greenhouse gas emissions from consumption in New Zealand," Motu Working Papers 15_06, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    7. Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika & Ekstrom, Marianne Pipping & Shanahan, Helena, 2003. "Food and life cycle energy inputs: consequences of diet and ways to increase efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 293-307, March.
    8. Kaparaju, P. & Rintala, J., 2011. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 31-41.
    9. Hong, Gui-Bing & Su, Te-Li & Lee, Jenq-Daw & Hsu, Tsung-Chi & Chen, Hua-Wei, 2010. "Energy conservation potential in Taiwanese textile industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7048-7053, November.
    10. Garita-Cambronero, Jerson & Paniagua-García, Ana I. & Hijosa-Valsero, María & Díez-Antolínez, Rebeca, 2021. "Biobutanol production from pruned vine shoots," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 124-133.
    11. Francisco Jesús García-Navarro & Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta & Jesús Antonio López Perales & Caridad Perez & Jose Angel Amorós & Sandra Bravo, 2023. "Sustainable Viticulture in the Valdepeñas Protected Designation of Origin: From Soil Quality to Management in Vitis vinifera," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Panzone, Luca A. & Wossink, Ada & Southerton, Dale, 2013. "The design of an environmental index of sustainable food consumption: A pilot study using supermarket data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 44-55.
    13. Marius Kazlauskas & Indrė Bručienė & Dainius Savickas & Vilma Naujokienė & Sidona Buragienė & Dainius Steponavičius & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Egidijus Šarauskis, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Winter Wheat Production Using Precision and Conventional Seeding Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Paola Masotti & Andrea Zattera & Mario Malagoli & Paolo Bogoni, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Organic and Biodynamic Wine Produced in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Sophie Sfez & Jo Dewulf & Wouter De Soete & Thomas Schaubroeck & Fabrice Mathieux & Dana Kralisch & Steven De Meester, 2017. "Toward a Framework for Resource Efficiency Evaluation in Industry: Recommendations for Research and Innovation Projects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Xiaowei Ma & Mei Wang & Chuandong Li, 2019. "A Summary on Research of Household Energy Consumption: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Mario Schmidt, 2018. "Scarcity and Environmental Impact of Mineral Resources—An Old and Never-Ending Discussion," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Love Offeibea Asiedu-Ayeh & Xungang Zheng & Kobina Agbodah & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Adjei Peter Darko, 2022. "Promoting the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies for Sustainable Farming: A Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Islam, Md. Monirul & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Samargandi, Nahla, 2024. "The nexus between Russian uranium exports and US nuclear-energy consumption: Do the spillover effects of geopolitical risks matter?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    20. Chan, David Yih-Liang & Yang, Kuang-Han & Hsu, Chung-Hsuan & Chien, Min-Hsien & Hong, Gui-Bing, 2007. "Current situation of energy conservation in high energy-consuming industries in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 202-209, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:63-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina GANESCU (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.