IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jeehcn/v12y2002i4n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knightian Firm: Uncertainty, Entrepreneurial Judgement and Coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Tony Fu-Lai

    (The University of New South Wales)

Abstract

This paper interprets Knight's views of the firm from the standpoint of his theory of human agency. Focusing on the coordination perspective, this paper argues that Knightian firms are institutions which deal with intersubjective uncertainty. The fundamental principle underlying an organized activity is the reduction of the uncertainty inherent in judgements and decisions by grouping the decisions of a particular individual and estimating the proportion of successes and failures. Coordinating activities by the use of the firm, shift focus and interest from errors in human agents' opinions of things to errors in their opinions of other people. By routinizing some judgements in the form of wage payments, firms allow the coordination of the interests of various parties and thus reduce uncertainty. Furthermore, entrepreneurs conduct economic calculation and bet their judgements on the value of the factors of production they employ. Correct entrepreneurial judgement is the ultimate source of profit. This paper calls for a research agenda on the theory of the firm to incorporate Knight's insights.Cet article interprète la vision knightienne de la firme du point de vue de sa théorie de l'agent humain. En s'intéressant principalement à l'enjeu de la coordination, cet article soutient que les entreprises sont, selon Knight, des institutions qui "agissent" en incertitude intersubjective. Le principe fondamental qui sous-tend une activité organisée est la réduction de l'incertitude inhérent aux jugements et décisions par le regroupement des décisions d'un individu et l'estimation des proportions de succès et d'échecs. Les activités de coordination par le biais de l'entreprise, déplacent le sujet d'étude et l'intérêt des erreurs dans les opinions qu'ont les agents humains à propos des choses vers leurs erreurs d'opinion sur les autres personnes. En rendant routiniers les jugements par la pratique de paiements de salaires, les firmes permettent la coordination des intérêts de parties variées et réduisent ainsi l'incertitude. De plus, les entrepreneurs procèdent à des calculs économiques et fondent leurs jugements sur la valeur des facteurs de production qu'ils emploient. Le jugement entrepreneurial correct est l'ultime source de profit. Cet article plaide en faveur d'un programme de recherche en théorie de l'entreprise qui incorpore les perspectives ouvertes par Knight.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Tony Fu-Lai, 2002. "The Knightian Firm: Uncertainty, Entrepreneurial Judgement and Coordination," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:12:y:2002:i:4:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1145-6396.1072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1072
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1145-6396.1072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:kyklos:v:52:y:1999:i:2:p:201-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gunning, J. Patrick, 1993. "Entrepreneurists and Firmists: Knight vs. The Modern Theory of the Firm," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 31-53, April.
    3. Richard N. Langlois & Nicolai J. Foss, 1999. "Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 201-218, May.
    4. Foss, Nicolai J., 1996. "The “Alternative” Theories of Knight and Coase, and the Modern Theory of the Firm," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 76-95, April.
    5. Paul L. Robertson & Tony F. Yu, 2001. "Firm strategy, innovation and consumer demand: a market process approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4-5), pages 183-199.
    6. LeRoy, Stephen F & Singell, Larry D, Jr, 1987. "Knight on Risk and Uncertainty," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 394-406, April.
    7. Barzel, Yoram, 1987. "Knight's 'Moral Hazard' Theory of Organization," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(1), pages 117-120, January.
    8. Langlois, Richard N & Cosgel, Metin M, 1993. "Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm: A New Interpretation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 31(3), pages 456-465, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tony Fu-Lai Yu, 2003. "A subjectivist approach to strategic management," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 335-345.
    2. Velamuri, Rama & Venkataraman, Sankaran, 2005. "Why stakeholder and stockholder theories are not necessarily contradictory: A knightian insight," IESE Research Papers D/591, IESE Business School.
    3. Hoch, Felix & Lohwasser, Todor S., 2019. "The influence of institutions on venture capital: How transaction costs, uncertainty, and change affect new ventures," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 9/2019, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    4. Haley, Usha C. V., 2003. "Assessing and controlling business risks in China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 237-252.
    5. Dew, Nicholas & Velamuri, S. Ramakrishna & Venkataraman, Sankaran, 2004. "Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 659-679, September.
    6. Aven, Terje, 2012. "The risk concept—historical and recent development trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 33-44.
    7. Aseem Kaul, 2013. "Entrepreneurial Action, Unique Assets, and Appropriation Risk: Firms as a Means of Appropriating Profit from Capability Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1765-1781, December.
    8. Elaine Mosakowski, 1998. "Entrepreneurial Resources, Organizational Choices, and Competitive Outcomes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 625-643, December.
    9. Marek Loužek, 2019. "Zakladatel chicagské školy Frank Hyneman Knight [Frank Hyneman Knight, the Founder of the Chicago School]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 198-214.
    10. Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra & Patricio Duran & Jean‐Luc Arregle & Marc van Essen, 2023. "Host Country Politics and Internationalization: A Meta‐Analytic Review," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 204-241, January.
    11. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Patricio Duran & Jean-Luc Arrègle & Marc van Essen, 2023. "Host Country Politics and Internationalization," Post-Print hal-04381312, HAL.
    12. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein, 2013. "Entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial governance and economic organization," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Adam Martin, 2010. "Uncertainty in the Post-Katrina Big Easy," Chapters, in: Emily Chamlee-Wright & Virgil Henry Storr (ed.), The Political Economy of Hurricane Katrina and Community Rebound, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    15. Wolfgang Burr, 2003. "Fundierung von Leistungstiefenentscheidungen auf der Basis modifizierter Transaktionskostenansätze," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 112-134, March.
    16. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Business history and the organization of industry," Post-Print hal-00211780, HAL.
    17. Benjamin Bathfield & Pierre Gasselin & Rémy Vandame & Santiago López-Ridaura & Luís García Barrios, 2010. "Adaptation de la gestion technique des producteurs de café et de miel face aux variations de prix au Guatemala : concepts et méthodes," Post-Print hal-00783500, HAL.
    18. Sheila Dow, 2012. "Uncertainty-Denial," Department Discussion Papers 1204, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    19. Leszek Dziawgo, 2014. "POLITICAL RISK ON THE FINANCIAL MARKET The problem of adequate scientific assessment of business operations - the naivety of economists," "e-Finanse", University of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Financial Research and Analysis, vol. 9(4), pages 39-47, April.
    20. Tony Yu, 2001. "An Entrepreneurial Perspective of Institutional Change," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 217-236, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:12:y:2002:i:4:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.