IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/cferev/v14y2025i3p67-86n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Environmental Regulation Achieve “Incremental Quality” of Green Technology Innovation? —— Evidence from the Target Responsibility System of Environmental Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Feng

    (Institute of Industrial Economics of Jinan University; Lab of Industrial Big Data Application and Economic Decision-Making Research, Jinan, China)

  • Zhao Jinyu

    (Institute of Industrial Economics of Jinan University, Jinan, China)

  • Zhou Hao

    (Institute of Industrial Economics of Jinan University, Jinan, China)

Abstract

The target responsibility system of environmental protection, introduced during the 11th Five-Year Plan period, is a key feature of China’s environmental regulation policy framework. Guided by the principle of high-quality development, this system addresses the challenge of incentivizing green technology innovation. This paper examines how the target responsibility system of environmental protection affects the quantity and quality of green technology innovation activities across society, identifying environmentally friendly invention patents at the International Patent Classification (IPC) group level. Using the difference-in-differences method, the study finds that while the target responsibility system of environmental protection has increased the number of green patent applications, it has also led to a decline in the quality of these innovations. Further analysis reveals that enterprises with weaker innovation capabilities are the primary contributors to the decline in innovation quality, particularly in the field of atmospheric pollution control technology, which is subject to environmental constraints, as well as in industries with moderate to light pollution. Notably, the substantive examination system effectively ensures the quality of authorized patents, mitigating the distortion effect of policies on innovation quality. The findings provide theoretical support and practical recommendations for deepening the reform of the target responsibility system of environmental protection, establishing a market-oriented green technology innovation system, and optimizing the intellectual property system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Feng & Zhao Jinyu & Zhou Hao, 2025. "Does Environmental Regulation Achieve “Incremental Quality” of Green Technology Innovation? —— Evidence from the Target Responsibility System of Environmental Protection," China Finance and Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 67-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:67-86:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/cfer-2025-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2025-0016
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cfer-2025-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marius Ley, Tobias Stucki, and Martin Woerter, 2016. "The Impact of Energy Prices on Green Innovation," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    2. Gray, Wayne B. & Shadbegian, Ronald J., 2003. "Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 384-402, November.
    3. Michael Greenstone & John A. List & Chad Syverson, 2011. "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competiveness of U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 11-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Antonin Bergeaud & Richard Blundell & David Hemous, 2019. "Innovation and Top Income Inequality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 1-45.
    5. Noailly, Joëlle & Smeets, Roger, 2015. "Directing technical change from fossil-fuel to renewable energy innovation: An application using firm-level patent data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 15-37.
    6. Petra Moser & Alessandra Voena, 2012. "Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 396-427, February.
    7. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    8. Chen, Zhao & Kahn, Matthew E. & Liu, Yu & Wang, Zhi, 2018. "The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 468-485.
    9. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    10. Chen, Shawn Xiaoguang, 2017. "The effect of a fiscal squeeze on tax enforcement: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 62-76.
    11. Ivan Haščič & Mauro Migotto, 2015. "Measuring environmental innovation using patent data," OECD Environment Working Papers 89, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xingshuai Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Lianggui Zhang, 2022. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Jun Mao & Jiahao Xie & Zunguo Hu & Lijie Deng & Haitao Wu & Yu Hao, 2023. "Sustainable development through green innovation and resource allocation in cities: Evidence from machine learning," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2386-2401, August.
    3. Huang, Xiaoqi & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhan & Zou, Xinyu & Li, Pujuan, 2023. "Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    4. Li, Zhenghui & Huang, Zimei & Su, Yaya, 2023. "New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation:Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Gao, Peng & He, Jie & Vochozka, Marek & Hu, Shiyang, 2024. "Deterrent effects of central environmental protection inspection on green technology innovation cycles: Evidence from the listed state-owned firms in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Mian Yang & Yining Yuan & Fuxia Yang & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2021. "Effects of environmental regulation on firm entry and exit and China’s industrial productivity: a new perspective on the Porter Hypothesis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 915-944, October.
    7. Ding, Jinxiu & Lu, Zhe & Yu, Chin-Hsien, 2022. "Environmental information disclosure and firms’ green innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 147-159.
    8. Shi, Beibei & Feng, Chen & Qiu, Meng & Ekeland, Anders, 2018. "Innovation suppression and migration effect: The unintentional consequences of environmental regulation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Hongzhong Fan & Shuang Tao & Shujahat Haider Hashmi, 2021. "Does the Construction of a Water Ecological Civilization City Improve Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Jian Song, 2024. "Environmental pollution, manufacturing cost disease and structural change," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21169-21195, August.
    11. Huang, Xiaoqi & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhan & Zhao, Zhihui, 2022. "Intensive judicial oversight and corporate green innovations: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Xie, Rong-hui & Yuan, Yi-jun & Huang, Jing-jing, 2017. "Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 104-112.
    13. Albrizio, Silvia & Kozluk, Tomasz & Zipperer, Vera, 2017. "Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 209-226.
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1jrfjrj6fp8t6q12fv5lra520c is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    16. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2021. "The impact of energy prices on socioeconomic and environmental performance: Evidence from French manufacturing establishments, 1997–2015," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Yan, Zihan & Liao, Lewei, 2025. "Entrepreneurial miracles in the low-carbon transition: Causal inference from China's low carbon city pilot," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1374-1390.
    18. Lan, Minghui & Zhang, Guangli & Yan, Wei & Qi, Fen & Qin, Lihua, 2024. "Greening through courts:Environmental law enforcement and corporate green innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 223-242.
    19. Shuijun Peng & Lamei Wu & Liang Zhang, 2024. "Environmental regulations in developing countries and the span of firms' production stages: Evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(8), pages 3421-3449, August.
    20. Yingzhu Yang & Qunhao Wang & Yang Gao & Lexiang Zhao, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote the Upgrade of the Export Technology Structure: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    21. Haichao Fan & Joshua Graff Zivin & Zonglai Kou & Xueyue Liu & Huanhuan Wang, 2025. "Going green in China: Firms' responses to stricter environmental regulations," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 385-410, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:67-86:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.