IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v32y2016i3-4p332-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis for models with multiple behavior modes: a method based on behavior pattern measures

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Hekimoğlu
  • Yaman Barlas
  • Luis Luna-Reyes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Hekimoğlu & Yaman Barlas & Luis Luna-Reyes, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis for models with multiple behavior modes: a method based on behavior pattern measures," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(3-4), pages 332-362, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:32:y:2016:i:3-4:p:332-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sdr.1568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Discussion Paper 1995-4, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Barlas, Yaman, 1989. "Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 59-87, September.
    3. Saleh, Mohamed & Oliva, Rogelio & Kampmann, Christian Erik & Davidsen, Pål I., 2010. "A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 673-683, June.
    4. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Shi, Wen & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Liu, Zhixue, 2014. "Factor screening for simulation with multiple responses: Sequential bifurcation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 136-147.
    6. Yasaman Jalili & David N. Ford, 2016. "Quantifying the impacts of rework, schedule pressure, and ripple effect loops on project schedule performance," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 82-96, January.
    7. Gabriella Dellino & Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Carlo Meloni, 2012. "Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 471-484, August.
    8. Jack P.C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-18087-8, April.
    9. Andrew Ford, 1990. "Estimating the Impact of Efficiency Standards on the Uncertainty of the Northwest Electric System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 580-597, August.
    10. Sibel Eker & Jill Slinger & Els Daalen & Gönenç Yücel, 2014. "Sensitivity analysis of graphical functions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(3), pages 186-205, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karsten Kieckhäfer & Gunnar Quante & Christoph Müller & Thomas Stefan Spengler & Matthias Lossau & Wolfgang Jonas, 2018. "Simulation-Based Analysis of the Potential of Alternative Fuels towards Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Aviation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Hekimoğlu, Mustafa & Sevim, Ismail & Aksezer, Çağlar & Durmuş, İpek, 2019. "Assortment optimization with log-linear demand: Application at a Turkish grocery store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 199-214.
    3. Jin Xu & Joep Cornelissen, 2023. "Disequilibrium and complexity across scales: a patch-dynamics framework for organizational ecology," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Ali K k & Erg n Y kseltan & Mustafa Hekimo lu & Esra Agca Aktunc & Ahmet Y cekaya & Ay e Bilge, 2022. "Forecasting Hourly Electricity Demand Under COVID-19 Restrictions," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 73-85.
    5. Christopher J Lynch & Saikou Y Diallo & Hamdi Kavak & Jose J Padilla, 2020. "A content analysis-based approach to explore simulation verification and identify its current challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-33, May.
    6. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    7. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    2. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    3. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    4. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    5. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.
    6. Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J. & Jochem, Patrick, 2019. "Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Saleh, Mohamed & Oliva, Rogelio & Kampmann, Christian Erik & Davidsen, Pål I., 2010. "A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 673-683, June.
    8. Ouyang, Linhan & Ma, Yizhong & Wang, Jianjun & Tu, Yiliu, 2017. "A new loss function for multi-response optimization with model parameter uncertainty and implementation errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 552-563.
    9. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2015. "Regression and Kriging Metamodels with Their Experimental Designs in Simulation : Review," Other publications TiSEM c592e895-1656-43c3-8c7e-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    11. Zhang, Wei & (Ato) Xu, Wangtu, 2017. "Simulation-based robust optimization for the schedule of single-direction bus transit route: The design of experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 203-230.
    12. Shi, Wen & Liu, Zhixue & Shang, Jennifer & Cui, Yujia, 2013. "Multi-criteria robust design of a JIT-based cross-docking distribution center for an auto parts supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 695-706.
    13. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    14. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    15. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    16. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    17. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2013. "Adjustable Robust Parameter Design with Unknown Distributions," Discussion Paper 2013-022, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "White Noise Assumptions Revisited : Regression Models and Statistical Designs for Simulation Practice," Discussion Paper 2006-50, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Carlos López-Hernández & Alejandro Rodríguez-Magaña, 2023. "Modeling Organizational Resilience in SMEs: A System Dynamics Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 29-50, March.
    20. Daneshzand, Farzaneh & Asali, Mehdi & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Diabat, Ali & Elkamel, Ali, 2022. "A simulation-based optimization scheme for phase-out of natural gas subsidies considering welfare and economic measures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:32:y:2016:i:3-4:p:332-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.