IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v32y2016i1p82-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the impacts of rework, schedule pressure, and ripple effect loops on project schedule performance

Author

Listed:
  • Yasaman Jalili
  • David N. Ford

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasaman Jalili & David N. Ford, 2016. "Quantifying the impacts of rework, schedule pressure, and ripple effect loops on project schedule performance," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 82-96, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:82-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sdr.1551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Edward Godlewski & Gregory Lee & Kenneth Cooper, 2012. "System Dynamics Transforms Fluor Project and Change Management," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 17-32, February.
    3. Kenneth G. Cooper, 1980. "Naval Ship Production: A Claim Settled and a Framework Built," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 20-36, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mustafa Hekimoğlu & Yaman Barlas & Luis Luna-Reyes, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis for models with multiple behavior modes: a method based on behavior pattern measures," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(3-4), pages 332-362, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George P. Richardson, 2014. ""Model" teaching III: Examples for the later stages," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(4), pages 291-299, October.
    2. Williams, Terry, 1999. "Towards realism in network simulation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 305-314, June.
    3. Repenning, Nelson P. (Nelson Peter), 1998. "The transition problem in product development," Working papers WP 4036-98., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "White Noise Assumptions Revisited : Regression Models and Statistical Designs for Simulation Practice," Other publications TiSEM d8c37ad3-f9a5-4824-986d-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Carlos López-Hernández & Alejandro Rodríguez-Magaña, 2023. "Modeling Organizational Resilience in SMEs: A System Dynamics Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 29-50, March.
    6. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.
    7. Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J. & Jochem, Patrick, 2019. "Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    9. T Williams, 2003. "Learning from projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 443-451, May.
    10. Matteo Richiardi & Roberto Leombruni & Nicole J. Saam & Michele Sonnessa, 2006. "A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15.
    11. Edward Godlewski & Gregory Lee & Kenneth Cooper, 2012. "System Dynamics Transforms Fluor Project and Change Management," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 17-32, February.
    12. S Howick & C Eden, 2004. "On the nature of discontinuities in system dynamics modelling of disrupted projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(6), pages 598-605, June.
    13. S Howick, 2003. "Using system dynamics to analyse disruption and delay in complex projects for litigation: can the modelling purposes be met?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(3), pages 222-229, March.
    14. Sibel Eker & Jill Slinger & Els Daalen & Gönenç Yücel, 2014. "Sensitivity analysis of graphical functions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(3), pages 186-205, July.
    15. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    16. Howick, Susan, 2005. "Using system dynamics models with litigation audiences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 239-250, April.
    17. Gradov, Dmitry Vladimirovich & Yusuf, Yusuf Oluwatoki & Ohjainen, Jussi & Suuronen, Jarkko & Eskola, Roope & Roininen, Lassi & Koiranen, Tuomas, 2022. "Modelling of a continuous veneer drying unit of industrial scale and model-based ANOVA of the energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    18. Joglekar, Nitin R. & Ford, David N., 2005. "Product development resource allocation with foresight," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 72-87, January.
    19. Thomas Walworth & Mike Yearworth & Laura Shrieves & Hillary Sillitto, 2016. "Estimating Project Performance through a System Dynamics Learning Model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 334-350, July.
    20. Ernesto A. Lagarda-Leyva & Angel Ruiz & Luis Fernando Morales-Mendoza, 2024. "A System Dynamics Approach to Valorize Overripe Figs in the Brewing of Artisanal Beer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:82-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.