IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v25y2016i1p161-178.html

Choosing the Quality of the Fit between Complementary Products

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim Sinitsyn

Abstract

In this paper, I examine how firms should position their complementary products. I assume that there are two competing firms, each producing two complementary products. Each firm decides whether to employ strategies that enhance the quality of the fit (the degree of complementarity) between its pair of complementary products before competing in prices. The consumers have heterogeneous tastes for the four possible bundles. They are willing to pay a price premium in order to purchase a bundle from the same firm if this firm chose to make such bundle more attractive. I find that increasing the degree of complementarity between a firm's complementary products intensifies price competition and often leads to smaller profits. Only when complementarity‐enhancing strategies significantly increase the demand for a firm's matching bundle, does the firm benefit from employing them. The highest profits for both firms are obtained when both firms do not employ complementarity‐enhancing strategies. Deteriorating the quality of the fit between one's own and a rival's complementary products is never profitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxim Sinitsyn, 2016. "Choosing the Quality of the Fit between Complementary Products," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 161-178, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:161-178
    DOI: 10.1111/jems.12136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jems.12136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Yu & Seetharaman, P.B. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 2012. "Modeling Dependencies in Brand Choice Outcomes Across Complementary Categories," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 47-62.
    2. Ryan Rahinel & Joseph P. Redden, 2013. "Brands as Product Coordinators: Matching Brands Make Joint Consumption Experiences More Enjoyable," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1290-1299.
    3. Simonin, Bernard L. & Ruth, Julie A., 1995. "Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers' reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-230, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoonju Han & Sandeep R. Chandukala & Hai Che, 2017. "Exchange and refund of complementary products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 113-125, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2012. "Coordination of Price Promotions in Complementary Categories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2076-2094, November.
    2. Imran Khan & Mobin Fatma, 2022. "Using Netnography to Understand Customer Experience towards Hotel Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Agarwal, Manoj K. & Frambach, Ruud T. & Stremersch, Stefan, 2000. "Does size matter? : disentangling consumers' bundling preferences," Serie Research Memoranda 0033, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Philippe Aurier & Victor D. Mejía, 2021. "The differing impacts of brand-line breadth and depth on customers’ repurchasing behavior of frequently purchased packaged goods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1244-1266, November.
    5. Sheng, Shibin & Pan, Yue, 2009. "Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 367-376.
    6. Chan, Tat Y. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi & Yoon, Yeujun, 2017. "Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 694-716.
    7. Koray Cosguner & Tat Y. Chan & P. B. (Seethu) Seetharaman, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing in a Distribution Channel in the Presence of Switching Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1212-1229, March.
    8. Ma, Yu & Seetharaman, P.B. (Seethu) & Singh, Vishal, 2021. "A multi-category demand model incorporating inter-product proximity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 152-162.
    9. Mohit Tyagi & Nomesh B. Bolia, 2024. "Optimal pricing of subscription services in the restaurant industry," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 262-273, June.
    10. Yoonju Han & Sandeep R. Chandukala & Hai Che, 2017. "Exchange and refund of complementary products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 113-125, March.
    11. Thomas M. Fojcik & Heike Proff, 2014. "Accelerating market diffusion of battery electric vehicles through alternative mobility concepts," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 347-368.
    12. Paula Brezovec & Nina Hampl, 2021. "Electric Vehicles Ready for Breakthrough in MaaS? Consumer Adoption of E-Car Sharing and E-Scooter Sharing as a Part of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Martínez-Garmendia, Josué, 2010. "Application of hedonic price modeling to consumer packaged goods using store scanner data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 690-696, July.
    14. Liang, Yongheng & Xu, Qian & Jin, Liyin, 2021. "The effect of smart and connected products on consumer brand choice concentration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 163-172.
    15. Zhao, Min & Xia, Lan, 2021. "Joint or separate? The effect of visual presentation on imagery and product evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 935-952.
    16. Monika Monika & Ferdi Antonio, 2022. "How Superhero Characters Shape Brand Alliances and Leverage the Local Brand: The Evidence from Indonesia," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Lee, Misuk & Cho, Youngsang, 2015. "Consumer perception of a new convergence product: A theoretical and empirical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 312-321.
    18. Bartelt, Nadja, 2018. "Bundling in Internetmärkten: Ökonomische Besonderheiten, Wettbewerbseffekte und Regulierungsimplikationen," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 120, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    19. Vaidyanathan, Rajiv & Aggarwal, Praveen, 2022. "Asymmetric brand alliances: When joint promotions with strong brands hurt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 213-228.
    20. Natéwindé Sawadogo & Youmanli Ouoba, 2023. "COVID-19, food coping strategies and households resilience: the case of informal sector in Burkina Faso," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 1041-1056, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:161-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.