IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v59y2025i1ne12615.html

The Negative Effects of Tipping Suggestions From Non‐Human Agents: Consumer Dislike of Manipulative Intent Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Attari
  • Frank G. Cabano
  • Elizabeth A. Minton

Abstract

Given the recent increase in the use of tip suggestions by non‐human agents, such as service robots or self‐checkout machines, this research investigates consumer responses to such tip suggestions through four experiments. Results support the overall sequential mediation model of tip suggestions → higher manipulative intent → lower satisfaction → negative word of mouth intentions. The results from Studies 1a and 1b demonstrate the direct effect of tip suggestions on negative word of mouth intentions. These studies also provide evidence that inference of manipulative intent serves as the underlying mechanism for this effect. Study 2 shows that tip suggestions provided by non‐human agents negatively influence consumers' satisfaction, but this effect gets attenuated for human agents. Finally, Study 3 demonstrates the overall sequential mediation model. This research provides new insights for marketers to help develop positive relationships with consumers by positively impacting consumers' attitudes and satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Attari & Frank G. Cabano & Elizabeth A. Minton, 2025. "The Negative Effects of Tipping Suggestions From Non‐Human Agents: Consumer Dislike of Manipulative Intent Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:1:n:e12615
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12615
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vahid Rahmani, 2023. "Persuasion knowledge framework: Toward a comprehensive model of consumers’ persuasion knowledge," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 12-33, June.
    2. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Wolter, Jeremy S. & Bock, Dora & Smith, Jeffery S. & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2017. "Creating Ultimate Customer Loyalty Through Loyalty Conviction and Customer-Company Identification," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 458-476.
    4. Cabano, Frank G. & Attari, Amin, 2023. "Don’t tell me how much to tip: The influence of gratuity guidelines on consumers’ favorability of the brand," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Andrea L. DeMaria & Jaziel Ramos‐Ortiz & Amy A. Faria & Gabrielle M. Wise, 2020. "Examining Consumer Purchase Behaviors and Attitudes toward Condom and Pharmacy Vending Machines in Italy: A Qualitative Study," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 286-310, March.
    6. Bharat Chandar & Uri Gneezy & John A. List & Ian Muir, 2019. "The Drivers of Social Preferences: Evidence from a Nationwide Tipping Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 26380, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Ge, Qi, 2018. "Sports sentiment and tipping behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 95-113.
    8. Singh, Jaywant & Crisafulli, Benedetta & Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao, 2020. "‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 464-480.
    9. Michael Lynn, 2018. "The Effects of Tipping on Consumers' Satisfaction with Restaurants," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 746-755, November.
    10. Svenja Mohr & Rainer Kühl, 2021. "Exploring persuasion knowledge in food advertising: an empirical analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(8), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Larivière, Bart & Bowen, David & Andreassen, Tor W. & Kunz, Werner & Sirianni, Nancy J. & Voss, Chris & Wünderlich, Nancy V. & De Keyser, Arne, 2017. "“Service Encounter 2.0”: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 238-246.
    12. van de Sanden, Stephanie & Willems, Kim & Brengman, Malaika, 2022. "How customers motive attributions impact intentions to use an interactive kiosk in-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Azar, Ofer H., 2007. "Why pay extra? Tipping and the importance of social norms and feelings in economic theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 250-265, April.
    14. Campbell, Margaret C & Kirmani, Amna, 2000. "Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 69-83, June.
    15. Fang‐Chi Lu & Jayati Sinha, 2023. "Understanding retail exclusion and promoting an inclusive customer experience at transforming service encounters," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 1482-1522, July.
    16. Lynn, Michael, 2016. "Why are we more likely to tip some service occupations than others? Theory, evidence, and implications," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 134-150.
    17. Umair Usman & TaeWoo Kim & Aaron Garvey & Adam Duhachek, 2024. "The Persuasive Power of AI Ingratiation: A Persuasion Knowledge Theory Perspective," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(3), pages 319-331.
    18. Dyussembayeva, Shynar & Viglia, Giampaolo & Nieto-Garcia, Marta & Mattila, Anna S., 2022. "Would you like to add a gratuity? When explicit requests hamper tipping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 908-917.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoover, Hanna, 2022. "Nudges as norms: Evidence from the NYC taxi cab industry," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Frank, David G. & Lynn, Michael, 2020. "Shattering the Illusion of the Self-Earned Tip: The Effect of a Restaurant Magician on Co-Workers’ Tips," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Warren, Nathan B. & Hanson, Sara, 2025. "Tipping privacy: The detrimental impact of observation on non-tip responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Woimant, Antonin & Steils, Nadia, 2025. "“Take no risk!†: Immediate and delayed backfire-effect of risk-reducing messages in retailers' return and exchange policies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Cabano, Frank G. & Attari, Amin, 2023. "Don’t tell me how much to tip: The influence of gratuity guidelines on consumers’ favorability of the brand," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Guilin Liu & Maggie Wenjing Liu & Qichao Zhu, 2025. "Hmm, the effect of AI conversational fillers on consumer purchase intentions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 593-605, September.
    7. Alsaad, Abdallah & Al-Okaily, Manaf, 2025. "Factors affecting the inference of manipulative intent in influencer marketing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    9. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    10. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    11. Singh, Jaywant & Crisafulli, Benedetta & Quamina, La Toya & Xue, Melanie Tao, 2020. "‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 464-480.
    12. Caldieraro, Fabio & Cunha, Marcus, 2022. "Consumers’ response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 724-744.
    13. Merle, Aurélie & St-Onge, Anik & Sénécal, Sylvain, 2022. "Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 532-543.
    14. Joëlle Vanhamme & Valérie Swaen & Guido Berens & Catherine Janssen, 2015. "Playing with fire: aggravating and buffering effects of ex ante CSR communication campaigns for companies facing allegations of social irresponsibility," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 565-578, December.
    15. Wu, Fang & Swait, Joffre & Chen, Yuxin, 2019. "Feature-based attributes and the roles of consumers' perception bias and inference in choice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 325-340.
    16. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    17. Cerasel O. Cuteanu & Ciprian Marcel Pop & Angela-Eliza Micu, 2025. "Systematic Review and Research Agenda Emphasizing Persuasion Knowledge Model as an Alternative Tool That Can Mitigate the Effect of Fake News on Consumers’ Intention to Adopt an Innovation," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 184-193.
    18. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushal, Vikrant & Shashi,, 2023. "Role of customer perceived brand ethicality in inducing engagement in online brand communities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Mehdi Hossain & Ritesh Saini, 2014. "Suckers in the morning, skeptics in the evening: Time-of-Day effects on consumers’ vigilance against manipulation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 109-121, June.
    20. Khandeparkar, Kapil & Motiani, Manoj & Sharma, Amalesh, 2021. "Thank you for not smoking – A multi-method investigation to understand the effect of anti-smoking warnings in television programs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 462-472.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:59:y:2025:i:1:n:e12615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.