IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v47y1996i1-4p1-17.html

Towards A Postmodern Agricultural Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Midmore

Abstract

Postmodernism has extended far beyond its origins in French literary criticism in the 1960s to provide a major challenge to orthodox intellectual ideas and ways of working. Its influence has so far been felt less in the social sciences than in the arts or humanities, and hardly at all in economics; yet because it is beginning to emerge within disciplines parallel to agricultural economics, such as human geography and rural sociology, it is prudent to attempt some anticipation of the impact of its trenchant critique on agricultural economics. Accordingly, a minimum set of the ideas, attitudes and implications of the phenomenon of postmodernism necessary to orient the unfamiliar are summarised, and related to contemporary concerns. The challenge which it might offer to mainstream economics is also considered, in terms of methodology and of understanding. In relation to rurality, postmodern emphases on the particular, the local and the diverse are examined as potential solutions to contemporary social, economic and environmental problems. Examples are drawn from model‐building, permacultural ethics, GIS and rural tourism to illustrate both the critique and the new approach that it involves. Postmodernism's ambivalence in relation to equality and social and economic justice is raised as a difficulty for a discipline which has traditionally had a focus on (and an ethical concern about) spatial inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Midmore, 1996. "Towards A Postmodern Agricultural Economics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:47:y:1996:i:1-4:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00667.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00667.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00667.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald N. McCloskey, 1990. "Agon and Ag Ec: Styles of Persuasion in Agricultural Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(5), pages 1124-1130.
    2. McCloskey, Donald N., "undated". "Agon and Ag Ec: Styles of Persuasion in Agricultural Economics," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271005, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Richard E. Just & Gordon C. Rausser, 1993. "The Governance Structure of Agricultural Science and Agricultural Economics: A Call to Arms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(Special_I), pages 69-83.
    4. Leontief, Wassily, 1971. "Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 1-7, March.
    5. Wassily Leontief, 1993. "Can Economics be Reconstructed as an Empirical Science?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(Special_I), pages 2-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Godden, David P., 2000. "Elegy, ode or panegyric: Australian agricultural economics in the last quarter of the twentieth century," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123652, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Tacconi, Luca, 1997. "An ecological economic approach to forest and biodiversity conservation: The case of vanuatu," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 1995-2008, December.
    3. Tacconi, Luca, 1998. "Scientific methodology for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 91-105, October.
    4. Midmore, Peter & Whittaker, Julie, 2000. "Economics for sustainable rural systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 173-189, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MacAulay, T. Gordon, 1995. "Games, Clubs And Models: The Economics Of An Agricultural Economics Society," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(01), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Sartorius von Bach, H. J., 1995. "Are South African Agricultural Economists Adequately Skilled To Face Future Challenges?," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(4), December.
    3. Cook, Michael L., 1992. "Agribusiness In A Global Economy: Challenges For An Evolving Profession," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-6, July.
    4. Mbatha, C. Nhlanhla & Antrobus, G.G., 2008. "Institutions and economic research: a case of location externalities on agricultural resource allocation in the Kat River basin, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(4), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Prabhat Vaze, 1998. "An Economic Analysis of Tenure in East Anglia Using Qualitative Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 443-457, September.
    6. Fisher, Ann & Wheeler, William J. & Zwick, Rami, 1993. "Experimental Methods in Agricultural and Resource Economics: How Useful are They?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 103-116, October.
    7. Meszaros, Sandor, 2008. "Theory testing (hypothesis testing) in agricultural economics," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 107, pages 1-13, March.
    8. Allen M. Featherstone & Ghassan A. Moghnieh & Barry K. Goodwin, 1995. "Farm‐level nonparametric analysis of cost‐minimization and profit‐maximization behavior," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 109-117, November.
    9. Buchholz, H. Eberhard, 2001. "50 Jahre Agrarwirtschaft," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(08), pages 1-2.
    10. Miguel A. Duran, 2007. "Mathematical Needs and Economic Interpretations," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Richard E. Just & Gordon C. Rausser, 1989. "An Assessment of the Agricultural Economics Profession," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1177-1190.
    12. David Slattery & Joseph G. Nellis, 2011. "Rethinking the Role of Regulation in the Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis: The Case of the UK," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 58(3), pages 407-423, September.
    13. Mjelde, James W. & Dixon, Bruce L. & Sonka, Steven T., 1989. "Estimating The Value Of Sequential Updating Solutions For Intrayear Crop Management," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(01), pages 1-8, July.
    14. Bruno Frey, 2005. "Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 173-190, April.
    15. repec:lan:wpaper:470 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Thomas Mayer, 2006. "The Empirical Significance of Econometric Models," Working Papers 620, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    17. Jacques Fontanel, 1979. "Les réflexions économiques suscitées par l'écologie," Post-Print hal-03499590, HAL.
    18. Sterman, John., 1986. "Testing behavioral simulation models by direct experiment," Working papers 1752-86., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. repec:ejw:journl:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:78-90 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Siebert, Horst, 1974. "Infrastruktur und Wachstum," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 4276, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    21. Henry, Mark, 2000. "A View from Agricultural and Applied Economics," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 30(1), pages 49-55, Summer.
    22. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Brakey, John, 1995. "The Political Economy of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society: Implications for Future Directions," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 148805, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:47:y:1996:i:1-4:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.