IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v56y2025i6p461-471.html

Timing is Everything: Lessons From a Trade Union Campaign for a ‘Right to Disconnect’

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Murphy

Abstract

In the context of reduced opportunities for traditional forms of union organising, this paper asks: how well do digital campaigns facilitate the advancement of trade union aims? The paper examines a campaign to secure a Right to Disconnect (RtD) for workers in the financial services sector in Ireland. Through interviews with key actors including union organisers and activists, as well as an in‐depth examination of secondary data, including union social media, policy documentation and survey data, this paper outlines the strategies underpinning the campaign, the techniques employed at various stages, and the outcomes achieved. The findings demonstrate how unions can advance their regulatory function through organising and contributes to our practical understanding of the orchestration of digital campaigns through a multifaceted approach, strategically targeting different stakeholders concurrently.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Murphy, 2025. "Timing is Everything: Lessons From a Trade Union Campaign for a ‘Right to Disconnect’," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 461-471, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:461-471
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard BOSCH, 1999. "Working time: Tendencies and emerging issues," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 138(2), pages 131-149, June.
    2. John Hopkins, 2024. "Managing the Right to Disconnect—A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Mauro Pucheta & Ana Cristina Ribeiro Costa, 2022. "Going Beyond the Right to Disconnect in a Flexible World: Light and Shadows in the Portuguese Reform," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 51(4), pages 967-984.
    4. Jelle Visser, 2024. "Will they rise again? Four scenarios for the future of trade unions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 629-652, August.
    5. Gregor Murray, 2017. "Union renewal: what can we learn from three decades of research?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 9-29, February.
    6. Raquel Rego & Wim Sprenger & Vassil Kirov & Greg Thomson & Daniele Di Nunzio, 2016. "The use of new ICTs in trade union protests – five European cases," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 315-329, August.
    7. Vincent Pasquier & Alex J Wood, 2018. "The power of social media as a labour campaigning tool: lessons from OUR Walmart and the Fight for 15," Post-Print hal-01903758, HAL.
    8. Tom Hunt & Heather Connolly, 2023. "Covid‐19 and the work of trade unions: Adaptation, transition and renewal," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 150-166, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelo Salento & Nicola Costalunga, 2023. "Sindacato, partecipazione, economia fondamentale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 15-33.
    2. Mohammad Sajjad Hussain, 2023. "Learning to Strike in the Gig Economy: Mobilization Efforts by Food Delivery Workers in Hyderabad, India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 431-456, December.
    3. Monika Martišková & Marta Kahancová & Jakub Kostolný, 2021. "Negotiating wage (in)equality: changing union strategies in high-wage and low-wage sectors in Czechia and Slovakia," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 75-96, February.
    4. Grégory Jemine, 2023. "It takes two to tango: Reconceptualizing union power and union effectiveness in a relational perspective," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 445-470, November.
    5. Marco Marrone & Paolo Borghi, 2023. "Ai margini del sindacato, il sindacato nei margini: democratizzazione, demercificazione e disinquinamento tra alleanze possibili e nuove pratiche," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 35-52.
    6. Janneke Plantenga, 2014. "Searching for Welfare, Work and Gender Equality. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 59," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47212.
    7. James Duggan & Michelle O’Sullivan & Maeve O’Sullivan, 2023. "Essential or excluded? Union pressures and state responses to platform work in three liberal market economies," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 491-505, November.
    8. Eduardo Mendoza Montoya & Carlos Eduardo Mendoza Leal, 2026. "Do Labor Action Plans Work? Evidence From the U.S.–Colombia Labor Action Plan and Union Rights Violations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 20-31, January.
    9. Heungjun Jung & Minju Shin, 2025. "Generational differences in work attitudes: The role of union instrumentality and socioeconomic status," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 318-339, May.
    10. D.S. Possenriede & J. Plantenga, 2014. "Temporal and locational flexibility of work, working-time fit, and job satisfaction," Working Papers 14-08, Utrecht School of Economics.
    11. Elisa Pannini, 2023. "Winning a battle against the odds: A cleaners’ campaign," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(1), pages 68-87, February.
    12. Christopher Smith & Linda Duxbury, 2020. "It is not just what you say, but how you say it: A case study exploring union‐member communications," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1-2), pages 2-33, March.
    13. Heather Connolly, 2020. "‘We just get a bit set in our ways’: renewing democracy and solidarity in UK trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 207-222, May.
    14. John MacInnes, 2005. "Work–Life Balance and the Demand for Reduction in Working Hours: Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2002," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 273-295, June.
    15. Duanyi Yang & Tingting Zhang, 2025. "Voice without Representation: Worker Voice in China’s Networked Public Sphere," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(5), pages 754-779, October.
    16. Andrea Bellini & Marco Betti & Alberto Gherardini & Francesco Lauria, 2023. "Collectivising services: a path to trade union renewal in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 457-473, November.
    17. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:7624-7636 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Cowling, Marc, 2007. "Still At Work? An empirical test of competing theories of long hours culture," MPRA Paper 1614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan, 2026. "The Global Union Federations and their affiliates: Constrained agency in action," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 47(1), pages 173-195, February.
    20. Lee, Horan & Staples, Ronald, 2018. "Digitale Solidarität unter Arbeitnehmer*innen [Digital Solidarity among workers]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(4), pages 495-517.
    21. Søren Kaj Andersen & Nana Wesley Hansen, 2019. "The creation and future of the new Danish trade union confederation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(2), pages 229-234, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:461-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.