IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v48y2017i4p365-382.html

Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Bechter
  • Bernd Brandl
  • Thomas Prosser

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 365-382, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:365-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/irj.12192
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guglielmo Meardi & Paul Marginson, 2014. "Global labour governance: potential and limits of an emerging perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 28(4), pages 651-662, August.
    2. Richard Hyman, 1997. "The Future of Employee Representation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 309-336, September.
    3. Bengt Larsson, 2012. "Obstacles to transnational trade union cooperation in Europe—results from a European survey," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 152-170, March.
    4. Anne Dufresne & C. Degryse & P. Pochet, 2006. "The European Sectoral Social Dialogue: Actors, developments and challenges," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/47217, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Christophe Degryse, 2015. "The European sectoral social dialogue: an uneven record of achievement?," Working Papers 12729, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).
    6. Hyman, Richard, 2001. "The Europeanisation – or the erosion – of industrial relations?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 751, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mas, José M. & Gómez, Andrés, 2021. "Social partners in the digital ecosystem: Will business organizations, trade unions and government organizations survive the digital revolution?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Bengt Larsson & Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2020. "What's the point of European Sectoral Social Dialogue? Effectiveness and polycontexturality in the hospital and metal sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 410-426, September.
    4. Melanie Simms, 2024. "The dynamics shaping experiences and prospects of employer coordination in a Liberal Market Economy: The case of Scotland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 606-628, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bengt Larsson & Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2020. "What's the point of European Sectoral Social Dialogue? Effectiveness and polycontexturality in the hospital and metal sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 410-426, September.
    2. Akgüç, Mehtap & Martišková, Monika & Szüdi, Gábor & Nordlund, Carl, 2019. "Stakeholders’ views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness," CEPS Papers 25211, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    3. Bryson, Alex, 2001. "Union effects on managerial and employee perceptions of employee relations in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4957, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Miguel Martínez Lucio & Stefania Marino & Heather Connolly, 2017. "Organising as a strategy to reach precarious and marginalised workers. A review of debates on the role of the political dimension and the dilemmas of representation and solidarity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 31-46, February.
    5. Aleksandra Gregorič & Thomas Poulsen, 2020. "When Do Employees Choose to Be Represented on the Board of Directors? Empirical Analysis of Board‐Level Employee Representation in Denmark," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 241-272, June.
    6. Bengt Larsson & Anton Törnberg, 2021. "Sectoral networks of transnational trade union cooperation in Europe," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(4), pages 1189-1209, November.
    7. Jane Lethbridge, 2011. "Social dialogue in the hospital sector at EU level," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 501-513, November.
    8. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    9. Ilaria Armaroli, 2022. "Integrating direct employee voice within the framework of worker representation: The role of an Italian trade union in organising disintermediation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 658-684, May.
    10. Bengt Furåker, 2020. "European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 345-358, August.
    11. Barbara Bechter & Sabrina Weber & Manuela Galetto & Bengt Larsson & Thomas Prosser, 2021. "Opening the black box: Actors and interactions shaping European sectoral social dialogue," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 269-288, September.
    12. John T. Addison & Alex Bryson & Paulino Teixeira & André Pahnke & Lutz Bellmann, 2013. "The Extent of Collective Bargaining and Workplace Representation: Transitions between States and their Determinants. A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Great Britain," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(2), pages 182-209, May.
    13. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 639-660, November.
    14. Alan Tuckman & Jeremé Snook, 2014. "Between consultation and collective bargaining? The changing role of non-union employee representatives: a case study from the finance sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 77-97, January.
    15. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    16. Aranea, Mona & Demougin, Philippe & Gooberman, Leon & Hauptmeier, Marco, 2021. "Handbook of European employers' organisations," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 225, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    17. Carsten Eckel & Hartmut Egger, 2017. "The Dilemma of Labor Unions: Local Objectives vs Global Bargaining," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 534-566, August.
    18. Engin Yildirim & Suayyip Calis & Abdurrahman Benli, 2008. "Turkish Labour Confederations and Turkey's Membership of the European Union," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(3), pages 362-387, August.
    19. Ralph Darlington, 2018. "The leadership component of Kelly’s mobilisation theory: Contribution, tensions, limitations and further development," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 617-638, November.
    20. John T. Addison & Claus Schnabel, 2011. "Worker Directors: A German Product that Did Not Export?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 354-374, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:365-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.