IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v17y2011i2p159-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuelle Perin

    (Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium, emmanuelle.perin@uclouvain.be)

  • Evelyne Léonard

    (Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium, evelyne.leonard@uclouvain.be)

Abstract

In 1998, the European Commission decided to institutionalize European sectoral social dialogue (ESSD) committees under a new harmonized form. As of 2010, there are 40 sectors with a sectoral committee. A recent Commission assessment suggested that there is a direct correlation between the effectiveness of ESSD and that of social dialogue on a national level. This article analyses in greater detail the relationships between the European committees and national-level social partners, showing that these relationships play a decisive role in the ability of ESSD to work efficiently. The article examines four dimensions of this ‘vertical coordination’: the representativeness of the European social partners; the Europeanization of interests; national players’ involvement in the ESSD committees and, finally, the implementation of joint texts. As these four dimensions are by no means autonomous, the article briefly examines their interaction in its last section, showing that this can fuel either a vicious circle hindering ESSD or, by contrast, a virtuous circle facilitating it.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:159-168
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258911401397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258911401397
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258911401397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina J. Colclough, 2005. "The sectoral social dialogue — telecommunications," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 391-396, August.
    2. Anne Dufresne & C. Degryse & P. Pochet, 2006. "The European Sectoral Social Dialogue: Actors, developments and challenges," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/47217, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Maria Lado & Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead, 2003. "Social dialogue in candidate countries: what for?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 64-87, February.
    4. Smismans, Stijn, 2008. "The European Social Dialogue in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 161-180, April.
    5. Pralle, Sarah B., 2003. "Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 233-260, September.
    6. Heribert Kohl & Hans-Wolfgang Platzer, 2003. "Labour relations in central and eastern Europe and the European social model," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 11-30, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    2. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    3. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    4. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    5. Livia Johannesson & Noomi Weinryb, 2021. "How to blame and make a difference: perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, March.
    6. Jane Lethbridge, 2011. "Social dialogue in the hospital sector at EU level," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 501-513, November.
    7. Marijn Faling & Robbert Biesbroek, 2019. "Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship for climate-smart agriculture in Kenya," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 525-547, December.
    8. Manuel Fischer & Philip Leifeld, 2015. "Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 363-382, September.
    9. Barbara Bechter & Sabrina Weber & Manuela Galetto & Bengt Larsson & Thomas Prosser, 2021. "Opening the black box: Actors and interactions shaping European sectoral social dialogue," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 269-288, September.
    10. David Kaufmann & Dominique Strebel, 2021. "Urbanising migration policy-making: Urban policies in support of irregular migrants in Geneva and Zürich," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 2991-3008, November.
    11. Kristin L. Olofsson, 2022. "Winners and losers: Conflict management through strategic policy engagement," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(1), pages 73-89, January.
    12. Susannah Fisher, 2012. "Policy Storylines in Indian Climate Politics: Opening New Political Spaces?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 109-127, February.
    13. Elizabeth Rough, 2011. "Policy Learning through Public Inquiries? The Case of UK Nuclear Energy Policy 1955–61," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(1), pages 24-45, February.
    14. Christopher Weible & Tanya Heikkila & Peter deLeon & Paul Sabatier, 2012. "Understanding and influencing the policy process," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Sébastien Jodoin, 2017. "The transnational policy process for REDD+ and domestic policy entrepreneurship in developing countries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1418-1436, December.
    16. Hasan DanaeeFard & Tayebeh Abbasi, 2021. "Why and How Does Policy Change over Time: a Narrative Explanation from Iran," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 355-376, June.
    17. Pülzl, Helga & Lazdinis, Marius, 2011. "May the Open Method of Coordination be a new instrument for forest policy deliberations in the European Union?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 411-418, July.
    18. Wang Jinjun & Wang Qun, 2018. "Social Autonomy and Political Integration: Two Policy Approaches to the Government-Nonprofit Relationship since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, May.
    19. Hannah Murphy & Aynsley Kellow, 2013. "Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 139-149, May.
    20. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:159-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.