IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v54y2023i2p167-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Galetto
  • Sabrina Weber
  • Bengt Larsson
  • Barbara Bechter
  • Thomas Prosser

Abstract

This article looks at the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee (SSDC) through a Community of Practice (CoP) theoretical lens. Based on a 2‐year project, qualitative in‐depth interviews at the European level and in five Member states, and participant observation of the hospital SSDC, we propose a shift from traditional institutional and resource‐based accounts and provide a learning and knowledge‐focused understanding of this specific area of European industrial relations. Interpreting the SSDCs as a CoP sheds new light on the role of power relations, participation and informal activities among members and on how they work together; this, we find, can alert those interested in more effective functioning of the European Sectoral Social Dialogue on how to strengthen this supra‐national level of industrial relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:54:y:2023:i:2:p:167-185
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bengt Larsson & Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2020. "What's the point of European Sectoral Social Dialogue? Effectiveness and polycontexturality in the hospital and metal sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 410-426, September.
    2. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    3. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    4. Philippe Pochet, 2005. "Sectoral social dialogue? A quantitative analysis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-332, August.
    5. Jane Lethbridge, 2011. "Social dialogue in the hospital sector at EU level," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 501-513, November.
    6. Hyman, Richard, 2005. "Trade unions and the politics of the European social model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 753, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. James Brooks & Irena Grugulis & Hugh Cook, 2020. "Rethinking Situated Learning: Participation and Communities of Practice in the UK Fire and Rescue Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(6), pages 1045-1061, December.
    8. Marius R. Busemeyer & Christian Kellermann & Alexander Petring & Andrej Stuchlík, 2008. "Overstretching solidarity? Trade unions' national perspectives on the European economic and social model," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 14(3), pages 435-452, August.
    9. Barbara Bechter & Sabrina Weber & Manuela Galetto & Bengt Larsson & Thomas Prosser, 2021. "Opening the black box: Actors and interactions shaping European sectoral social dialogue," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 269-288, September.
    10. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    11. Alessia Contu & Hugh Willmott, 2003. "Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 283-296, June.
    12. Berndt Keller, 2005. "Europeanisation at sectoral level. Empirical results and missing perspectives," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 397-408, August.
    13. Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 365-382, July.
    14. Christophe Degryse, 2015. "The European sectoral social dialogue: an uneven record of achievement?," Working Papers 12729, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    2. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    3. Krzysztof Bandasz, 2014. "A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 505-520, November.
    4. Torsten Müller & Hans-Wolfgang Platzer, 2020. "The European Trade Union Federations within the European polity: ETUFs and international trade union activity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 289-305, August.
    5. Melanie Simms, 2024. "The dynamics shaping experiences and prospects of employer coordination in a Liberal Market Economy: The case of Scotland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 606-628, August.
    6. Bengt Larsson & Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2020. "What's the point of European Sectoral Social Dialogue? Effectiveness and polycontexturality in the hospital and metal sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 410-426, September.
    7. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    8. Andrew J. Rosman, 2011. "Auditors' going‐concern judgments: rigid, adaptive, or both?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 30-45, February.
    9. Milan Zafirovski, 2022. "Some dilemmas of economic democracy: Indicators and empirical analysis," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 252-302, February.
    10. Laurie Field, 2017. "Interest Differences and Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Raissa Ulbrich & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "The German Permaculture Community from a Community of Practice Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Anne Kokkonen & Pauli Alin, 2015. "Practice-based learning in construction projects: a literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 513-530, July.
    13. Mareschal, Patrice M., 2017. "Public Sector Labour Relations in the United States: Austerity, Politics and Policy [Arbeitsbeziehungen des öffentlichen Sektors in den Vereinigten Staaten: Austerität, Politics und Policy]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 24(4), pages 450-471.
    14. Sandra A. Slaughter & Laurie J. Kirsch, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Portfolios in Software Process Improvement: A Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-320, September.
    15. Bengt Furåker, 2020. "European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 345-358, August.
    16. Nathalie Duval-Couetil & Michael Ladisch & Soohyun Yi, 2021. "Addressing academic researcher priorities through science and technology entrepreneurship education," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 288-318, April.
    17. Shelly Meyers & David Lester, 2013. "The Effects of Situated Learning Through a Community Partnership in a Teacher Preparation Program," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, August.
    18. Aranea, Mona & Demougin, Philippe & Gooberman, Leon & Hauptmeier, Marco, 2021. "Handbook of European employers' organisations," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 225, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    19. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    20. Clark, Michael & Cornes, Michelle & Manthorpe, Jill & Hennessy, Catherine & Anderson, Sarah, 2015. "Releasing the grip of managerial domination: the role of communities of practice in tackling multiple exclusion homelessness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64325, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:54:y:2023:i:2:p:167-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.