IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v20y2014i4p505-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Bandasz

    (Department of Sociology and Philosophy, Faculty of Economics, Poznan University of Economics)

Abstract

The debate on the agreement in the hairdressing sector reflects fundamental questions about the role of the European social dialogue and the social partners in European governance. In 2012 trade unions and employers’ organizations reached a compromise on improving health and safety standards in the sector across the EU. Despite the relatively narrow scope of the agreement, it has become a highly politicized battleground of the European social dialogue and the European Commission took an unprecedented decision to – de facto – block its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Bandasz, 2014. "A framework agreement in the hairdressing sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(4), pages 505-520, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:20:y:2014:i:4:p:505-520
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258914538914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258914538914
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258914538914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Pochet, 2005. "Sectoral social dialogue? A quantitative analysis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-332, August.
    2. Stefan Clauwaert, 2011. "2011: 20 years of European interprofessional social dialogue: achievements and prospects," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 169-179, May.
    3. Paul Marginson & Keith Sisson, 2006. "European Integration and Industrial Relations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-50410-3.
    4. Smismans, Stijn, 2008. "The European Social Dialogue in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 161-180, April.
    5. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2016. "Soft procedures for hard impacts," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(4), pages 475-490, November.
    2. Manuela Galetto & Sabrina Weber & Bengt Larsson & Barbara Bechter & Thomas Prosser, 2023. "‘You see similarities more than differences after a while’. Communities of Practice in European industrial relations. The case of the hospital European Sectoral Social Dialogue," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    4. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    5. Dorian Aliu & Ayten Akatay & Armando Aliu & Umut Eroglu, 2017. "Public Policy Influences on Academia in the European Union," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    6. Vera Glassner, 2011. "Gewerkschaftsansätze zur lohnpolitischen Koordinierung in der Eurozone," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 37(4), pages 531-553.
    7. Pülzl, Helga & Lazdinis, Marius, 2011. "May the Open Method of Coordination be a new instrument for forest policy deliberations in the European Union?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 411-418, July.
    8. Christophe Degryse & Philippe Pochet, 2011. "Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 145-158, May.
    9. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2011:v:37i:4p:531 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Stevis, Dimitris., 2010. "International framework agreements and global social dialogue : parameters and prospects," ILO Working Papers 994539893402676, International Labour Organization.
    11. Aliu, Armando, 2012. "European industrial relations: transnational relations and global challenges," MPRA Paper 38897, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Marginson, Paul & Keune, Maarten, 2012. "European social dialogue as multi-level governance: Towards more autonomy and new dependencies," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.
    13. Andrea Iossa & Maria Persdotter, 2021. "Cross‐Border Social Dumping as a ‘Game of Jurisdiction’ – Towards a Legal Geography of Labour Relations in the EU Internal Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1086-1102, September.
    14. Maritta Soininen, 2014. "The Problem of Mismatch in Successful Cross-Sectoral Collaboration," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 43-56.
    15. Valentina Paolucci & Paul Marginson, 2020. "Collective bargaining towards mutual flexibility and security goals in large internationalised companies—why do institutions (still) matter?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 329-350, July.
    16. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 191-219, March.
    17. Sabrina Weber, 2010. "Sectoral social dialogue at EU level - recent results and implementation challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 489-507, November.
    18. Samuel Klebaner, 2023. "Trade unions facing a French industrial policy: The emergence of a medical imaging filière," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(2), pages 573-603, May.
    19. Maarten Keune & Paul Marginson, 2013. "Across Boundaries: The Global Challenges Facing Workers and Employment Research 50th Anniversary Special Issue," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(3), pages 473-497, September.
    20. repec:ilo:ilowps:453989 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Aranea, Mona & Gooberman, Leon & Hauptmeier, Marco, 2021. "What do European employers' organisations do?," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 226, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:20:y:2014:i:4:p:505-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.