IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i6p2787-2802.html

Doing gender in death care: How women are finding their place in Italian funeral directing services

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Grandi
  • Gloria Guidetti
  • Daniela Converso
  • Nicoletta Bosco
  • Lara Colombo

Abstract

Gendered norms in society can strongly influence the presence of men or women in professional contexts. This study examined the perceptions of 13 women working in the funeral directing services in order to better understand how they perform gender roles to play in a field that has long been considered male‐dominated. The findings suggest that women face many challenges to play a professional role in funeral directing and that they rely on their ability to perform care work to be recognized as better professionals. The issue of physical strength—a characteristic element of funeral work—seems to be an issue that still arouses contrasting positions among women. Another finding was that women also perform gender roles through their professional appearance, which they recognize as an important aspect of their professionalism. This work brings new insight into this specific and under‐researched area and provides new understanding on how women use gender performativity to achieve professionalism in the death care; in particular, it shows that women do gender in different ways to achieve the same entitlement to be good funeral professionals as men.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Grandi & Gloria Guidetti & Daniela Converso & Nicoletta Bosco & Lara Colombo, 2024. "Doing gender in death care: How women are finding their place in Italian funeral directing services," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2787-2802, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:2787-2802
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Fielden & Marilyn Davidson & Andrew Gale & Caroline Davey, 2000. "Women in construction: the untapped resource," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 113-121.
    2. Allison†Scott Pruitt, 2018. "Redoing Gender: How Women in the Funeral Industry Use Essentialism for Equality," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 144-158, March.
    3. Alison Cathles & David E. Harrington & Kathy Krynski, 2010. "The Gender Gap in Funeral Directors: Burying Women with Ready‐to‐Embalm Laws?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 688-705, December.
    4. Anders Fremstad & Mark Paul, 2020. "Opening the Farm Gate to Women? The Gender Gap in U.S. Agriculture," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 124-141, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tessa Wright & Hazel Conley, 2020. "Advancing gender equality in the construction sector through public procurement: Making effective use of responsive regulation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(4), pages 975-996, November.
    2. Larissa Bamberry & Donna Bridges & Elizabeth Wulff & Branka Krivokapic-Skoko, 2022. "Inequality regimes in male-dominated trades: What role do apprenticeship intermediaries (GTOs) play?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 547-565, September.
    3. Allison†Scott Pruitt, 2018. "Redoing Gender: How Women in the Funeral Industry Use Essentialism for Equality," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 144-158, March.
    4. Monica Fisher & Paul A. Lewin & Ryanne Pilgeram, 2022. "Farmworkers and the gender wage gap: An empirical analysis of wage inequality in US agriculture," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 2145-2163, December.
    5. Owain Smolović Jones & Sanela Smolović Jones & Scott Taylor & Emily Yarrow, 2022. "Theorizing gender desegregation as political work: The case of the Welsh Labour Party," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1747-1763, November.
    6. Samuel Heimann & Kristina Johansson, 2024. "Gendered work in geoscience: Hard work in a masculine field," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 16-35, January.
    7. SAKA Najimu & MOYANGA Dorcas Titilayo & ADEGBEMBO Taiwo Fadeke, 2022. "Factors Limiting the Participation of Women Construction Professionals (WCPs) in the Nigerian Construction Sector (NCS)," Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Morris M. Kleiner & Alan B. Krueger, 2013. "Analyzing the Extent and Influence of Occupational Licensing on the Labor Market," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(S1), pages 173-202.
    9. Donna Bridges & Larissa Bamberry & Elizabeth Wulff & Branka Krivokapic‐Skoko, 2022. "“A trade of one's own”: The role of social and cultural capital in the success of women in male‐dominated occupations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 371-387, March.
    10. Xia, Xing, 2021. "Barrier to Entry or Signal of Quality? The Effects of Occupational Licensing on Minority Dental Assistants," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Berget, Carolina & Mook, Anne & Dwivedi, Puneet, 2024. "Self-efficacy toward prescribed burning among female and male family forest landowners in Georgia, US," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. repec:jpe:journl:1576 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Tricia Glazebrook & Samantha Noll & Emmanuela Opoku, 2020. "Gender Matters: Climate Change, Gender Bias, and Women’s Farming in the Global South and North," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Liyaning (Maggie) Tang & Shaleeza Sohail & Emma Shorthouse & Larissa Sullivan & Matthew Williams, 2022. "Put Gender on the Tender in Australian Public Projects," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11, September.
    15. Navneel Shalendra Prasad & Asa Romeo Asa & Xu Hongyi, 2015. "Attitude and Behavioral Intention towards Reducing Carbon Footprints in the Environment: an Empirical Study of Fiji," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(5), pages 21-30, April.
    16. Schmidt, Claudia & Goetz, Stephan J. & Tian, Zheng, 2021. "Female farmers in the United States: Research needs and policy questions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Monica Fisher & Paul A. Lewin & Ryanne Pilgeram, 2023. "Gender differences in the financial performance of U.S. farm businesses: A decomposition analysis using the Census of Agriculture," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1233-1253, June.
    18. Bonface O. Manono, 2025. "Small-Scale Farming in the United States: Challenges and Pathways to Enhanced Productivity and Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Marc T. Law & Mindy S. Marks, 2017. "The Labor-Market Effects of Occupational Licensing Laws in Nursing," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 640-661, October.
    20. Carly E. Nichols, 2024. "Being a woman with the “skills of a man”: negotiating gender in the 21st century US Corn Belt," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1053-1068, September.
    21. Jacqueline H. Watts, 2009. "Leaders of men: women ‘managing’ in construction," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 512-530, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:2787-2802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.