IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i1p287-305.html

Data Elements Marketization and Corporate ESG Performance: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment Based on China's Data Trading Platforms Pilot Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Caishi Zhang
  • Fangyi Lin
  • Yichuan Shi

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of Data Element Marketization (DEM) on corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, using a quasi‐natural experiment based on China's data trading platforms pilot policies. Employing a Difference‐in‐Differences (DID) framework, we find that DEM significantly enhances ESG outcomes by alleviating financing constraints, promoting digital transformation, and strengthening external supervision. Our results highlight that firms with higher intangible asset intensity and those located in more marketized regions experience stronger improvements in ESG performance. Additionally, DEM also helps mitigate greenwashing behaviors. This study contributes to the understanding how market mechanisms for data circulation can drive corporate sustainability and offers policy implications for advancing DEM reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Caishi Zhang & Fangyi Lin & Yichuan Shi, 2026. "Data Elements Marketization and Corporate ESG Performance: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment Based on China's Data Trading Platforms Pilot Policies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 287-305, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:287-305
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:287-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.