IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i7p3959-3975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Enforcement and Corporate Labor Income Share: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiacai Xiong
  • Linghong Chen
  • Dongwei Su
  • Kejing Chen

Abstract

This study examines the effects of stricter tax enforcement on the labor income share of firms in China, using the merger of the State Tax Bureau (STB) and Local Tax Bureau (LTB) as a quasi‐natural experiment. We employ a difference‐in‐differences (DID) approach and find that after the merger, tougher tax enforcement leads to a decrease in the labor income share of firms. This effect is particularly pronounced in firms that are highly reliant on labor or have lower tax transfer abilities. The mechanism tests indicate that stricter tax enforcement increases tax burdens, financing costs, and financing constraints, and decreases tax avoidance, leading to higher fixed assets investment and reduced human capital investment. These results are in line with the financing constraint channel. The findings remain robust when subjected to parallel trend testing, alternative variable measurements, and sample selection, excluding the impact of other policies and anticipation effect. Our findings can inform policymakers in their efforts to modernize and transform the tax governance system, reduce the income gap, and promote common prosperity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiacai Xiong & Linghong Chen & Dongwei Su & Kejing Chen, 2025. "Tax Enforcement and Corporate Labor Income Share: Evidence From a Quasi‐Natural Experiment in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 3959-3975, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3959-3975
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:7:p:3959-3975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.