IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecanth/v5y2018i1p20-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sucre indigène and sucre colonial: Reconsidering the splitting of the French national sugar market, 1800–1860

Author

Listed:
  • Jonna M. Yarrington

Abstract

In the early 1800s, the French beet sugar industry was established to provide sugar autarky for France. From the beginning, it competed with French Caribbean cane sugar. Over sixty years, the two complexes produced their own blocs that coexisted and split the French national sugar market, both claiming rights to governmental protection. This article argues that reconsidering the sugar question provides evidence for a shift in the political–economic concept of colony, drawing on pamphlets from the 1830s and 1840s as well as relevant secondary historiography. The blocs struggled over definitions of protection, indemnity, and, ultimately, the relationship of colony and nation. The splitting of the market thus amounted to a rupture of colonies from metropole, which provides an underplayed colonial dimension to economic liberalization and a history of liberal precepts quietly at work in the developing rift. The question des sucres bears witness to a fraught disintegration—symbolic, political, and economic—of the oldest French colonies from the nation that had built them.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonna M. Yarrington, 2018. "Sucre indigène and sucre colonial: Reconsidering the splitting of the French national sugar market, 1800–1860," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 20-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:20-31
    DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sea2.12099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crouzet, François, 1964. "Wars, Blockade, and Economic Change in Europe, 1792–1815," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 567-588, December.
    2. Anna Bezanson, 1922. "The Early Use of the Term Industrial Revolution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 36(2), pages 343-349.
    3. Kindleberger, C. P., 1975. "The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe, 1820–1875," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 20-55, March.
    4. Paul Butel, 1989. "Succès et déclin du commerce colonial français, de la Révolution à la Restauration," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(6), pages 1079-1096.
    5. White, Eugene N., 2001. "Making the French pay: The costs and consequences of the Napoleonic reparations," European Review of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 337-365, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pravin Krishna & Devashish Mitra, 2016. "Reciprocated unilateralism in trade policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Trade Policy Theory, Evidence and Applications, chapter 3, pages 37-63, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2009. "Agricultural Protection Growth in Europe, 1870-1969," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 50296, World Bank.
    3. Kim Oosterlinck & Loredana Ureche-Rangau & Jacques-Marie Vaslin, 2013. "Waterloo: a Godsend for French Public Finances?," Working Papers 0041, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    4. Chilosi, David & Murphy, Tommy E. & Studer, Roman & Tunçer, A. Coşkun, 2013. "Europe's many integrations: Geography and grain markets, 1620–1913," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 46-68.
    5. Riva, Angelo & White, Eugene N., 2011. "Danger on the exchange: How counterparty risk was managed on the Paris exchange in the nineteenth century," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 478-493.
    6. Zissimos, Ben, 2017. "A theory of trade policy under dictatorship and democratization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 85-101.
    7. Tim Josling, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Western Europe," World Bank Publications - Reports 28186, The World Bank Group.
    8. Mark Harrison, 2016. "Myths of the Great War," Studies in Economic History, in: Jari Eloranta & Eric Golson & Andrei Markevich & Nikolaus Wolf (ed.), Economic History of Warfare and State Formation, pages 135-158, Springer.
    9. Vincent Bignon & Pierre Sicsic, 2022. "Quelles leçons de l’histoire ? ou comment faire face aux fortes augmentations de dette publique ?," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 41-66.
    10. Guillaume Daudin & Kevin O'Rourke & Leandro Prados de La Escosura, 2008. "Trade and Empire, 1700-1870," Working Papers hal-03459838, HAL.
    11. Armand M. Leroi & Ben Lambert & Matthias Mauch & Marina Papadopoulou & Sophia Ananiadou & Staffan I. Lindberg & Patrik Lindenfors, 2020. "On revolutions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/670 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2012. "Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 308-325.
    14. Riello, Giorgio & O'Brien, Patrick, 2004. "Reconstructing the Industrial Revolution: analyses, perceptions and conceptions of Britain’s precocious transition to Europe’s first industrial society," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 22337, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Réka Juhász, 2014. "Temporary Protection and Technology Adoption: Evidence from the Napoleonic Blockade," CEP Discussion Papers dp1322, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    16. Elise S. Brezis, 2022. "Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and Carthaginian Peace?‎," Working Papers 2022-04, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
    17. Christopher Bliss, 2003. "A Specific‐Factors Model with Historical Application," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 268-278, May.
    18. Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2009. "The Growth of Agricultural Protection in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(11), pages 1499-1537, November.
    19. Pawlak, Karolina, 2011. "The evolution of the agricultural protectionism and its measures," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 11(26), pages 1-10, September.
    20. Pamfili Antipa, 2014. "How Fiscal Policy Affects the Price Level: Britain s First Experience with Paper Money," Working papers 525, Banque de France.
    21. Devereux, Michael B. & Smith, Gregor W., 2007. "Transfer problem dynamics: Macroeconomics of the Franco-Prussian war indemnity," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2375-2398, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:20-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2330-4847 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.