IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/coecpo/v44y2026i2p394-407.html

The effect of civilian monitoring on fatal encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Harvey

Abstract

Does civilian monitoring affect police use of force? Using evidence from the Safe Passage program, I exploit geographic and temporal variation in the program's release in a difference‐in‐difference framework. I find that fatal encounters decrease in areas where the program was implemented by 33% $33\%$. While this effect cannot be directly tied to the presence of monitors, it is robust to multiple subsets of fatal encounters and levels of fixed effects. The program also leads to an increase in police presence as captured by investigatory stop and a very small increase in police usage among civilians. However, civilian sentiments as captured by self‐reported trust and safety scores do not change in response to the Safe Passage program; I also find no statistically significant change in complaints against officers after the program.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Harvey, 2026. "The effect of civilian monitoring on fatal encounters," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 394-407, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:44:y:2026:i:2:p:394-407
    DOI: 10.1111/coep.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.70010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/coep.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamein P. Cunningham & Rob Gillezeau, 2021. "Don’t Shoot! The Impact of Historical African American Protest on Police Killings of Civilians," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Emma Pierson & Camelia Simoiu & Jan Overgoor & Sam Corbett-Davies & Daniel Jenson & Amy Shoemaker & Vignesh Ramachandran & Phoebe Barghouty & Cheryl Phillips & Ravi Shroff & Sharad Goel, 2020. "A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 736-745, July.
    3. Desmond Ang & Panka Bencsik & Jesse Bruhn & Ellora Derenoncourt, 2021. "Police violence reduces civilian cooperation and engagement with law enforcement," Working Papers 2021-005, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    4. Desmond Ang & Panka Bencsik & Jesse Bruhn & Ellora Derenoncourt, 2025. "Community Engagement with Law Enforcement after High-Profile Acts of Police Violence," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 124-142, March.
    5. Gonzalez, Robert & Komisarow, Sarah, 2020. "Community monitoring and crime: Evidence from Chicago's Safe Passage Program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Ryan Hübert & Andrew T Little, 2023. "A Behavioural Theory of Discrimination in Policing," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(655), pages 2828-2843.
    7. McMillen, Daniel & Sarmiento-Barbieri, Ignacio & Singh, Ruchi, 2019. "Do more eyes on the street reduce Crime? Evidence from Chicago's safe passage program," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-25.
    8. Sanfelice, Viviane, 2019. "Are safe routes effective? Assessing the effects of Chicago’s Safe Passage program on local crimes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 357-373.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez, Robert & Jabri, Ranae & Komisarow, Sarah, 2025. "When does crime respond to punishment?: Evidence from drug-free school zones," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Federico Masera, 2022. "The economics of policing and crimeThe economics of policing and crime," Chapters, in: Paolo Buonanno & Paolo Vanin & Juan Vargas (ed.), A Modern Guide to the Economics of Crime, chapter 2, pages 12-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Celislami, Elda & Kastoryano, Stephen & Mastrobuoni, Giovanni, 2023. "Strategic Bureaucratic Opacity: Evidence from Death Investigation Laws and Police Killings," IZA Discussion Papers 16609, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Domínguez, Magdalena & Montolio, Daniel, 2021. "Bolstering community ties as a mean of reducing crime," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 916-945.
    5. Elisa Facchetti, 2025. "Police infrastructure, police performance, and crime: evidence from austerity cuts," IFS Working Papers W24/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Kitchens, Carl & Wallace, Cullen T., 2022. "The impact of place-based poverty relief: Evidence from the Federal Promise Zone Program," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2022. "Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Homicide Clearance in the United States," Papers 2203.04768, arXiv.org.
    8. Bocar A. Ba & Abdoulaye Ndiaye & Roman G. Rivera & Alexander Whitefield, 2024. "Mispricing Narratives after Social Unrest," CESifo Working Paper Series 11264, CESifo.
    9. Dasom Lee & David J. Hess, 2022. "Public concerns and connected and automated vehicles: safety, privacy, and data security," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Kai Barron & Ruth Ditlmann & Stefan Gehrig & Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch, 2025. "Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1600-1622, February.
    11. Kyle S. H. Dobson & Andrea G. Dittmann & David S. Yeager, 2025. "A transparency statement improves trust in community-police interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. repec:osf:socarx:2gyuv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Albouy, David & Christensen, Peter & Sarmiento-Barbieri, Ignacio, 2020. "Unlocking amenities: Estimating public good complementarity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Mikdash, Maya & Zaiour, Reem, 2024. "The impact of police shootings on gun violence and civilian cooperation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Margaret A. Meyer & Richard Gonzalez, 2024. "Detecting Bias in Traffic Searches: Examining False Searches of Innocent Drivers," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 791-812, December.
    16. Alston, Mackenzie & Owens, Emily, 2025. "Does black and blue matter? An experimental investigation of race, perceptions of police, and legal compliance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    17. Johann D Gaebler & Phoebe Barghouty & Sarah Vicol & Cheryl Phillips & Sharad Goel, 2023. "Forgotten but not gone: A multi-state analysis of modern-day debt imprisonment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Campedelli, Gian Maria, 2022. "Explainable machine learning for predicting homicide clearance in the United States," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Pauline Grosjean & Federico Masera & Hasin Yousaf, 2023. "Inflammatory Political Campaigns and Racial Bias in Policing," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(1), pages 413-463.
    20. Cho, Sungwoo & Gonçalves, Felipe & Weisburst, Emily, 2021. "Do Police Make Too Many Arrests? The Effect of Enforcement Pullbacks on Crime," IZA Discussion Papers 14907, IZA Network @ LISER.
    21. Nils Braakmann & Andy & J. James Reade & Gennaro Rossi, 2025. "Football Matches and Policing: Evidence from London," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2025-07, Department of Economics, University of Reading.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:44:y:2026:i:2:p:394-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.