IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-024-55709-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A transparency statement improves trust in community-police interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle S. H. Dobson

    (University of Virginia)

  • Andrea G. Dittmann

    (Marshall School of Business)

  • David S. Yeager

    (University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Over the past three decades, billions have been invested in community policing to foster positive interactions between officers and community members. Yet, public trust in police continues to decline. Our qualitative analysis of over 500 hours of naturalistic observations suggests a potential reason: the questioning styles of officers in community policing may make community members feel threatened. Observations also point to a solution: transparent communication of benevolent intent. Building on this, a pre-registered field experiment (N = 232) finds that community members feel less threatened and report greater trust when officers use a brief transparency statement (e.g., “I’m walking around trying to get to know the community”). These findings are supported by exploratory natural language processing and sympathetic nervous system measures. Six online experiments (total N = 3210) further show that transparency statements are effective across diverse groups and isolate the conditions where they work best. This multi-method investigation underscores the importance of transparency in fostering positive community-police relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle S. H. Dobson & Andrea G. Dittmann & David S. Yeager, 2025. "A transparency statement improves trust in community-police interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55709-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55709-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-55709-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-55709-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Yeager & Paul Hanselman & Gregory M. Walton & Jared S. Murray & Robert Crosnoe & Chandra Muller & Elizabeth Tipton & Barbara Schneider & Chris S. Hulleman & Cintia P. Hinojosa & David Paunesk, 2019. "A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7774), pages 364-369, September.
    2. Christian T. Elbæk & Panagiotis Mitkidis & Lene Aarøe & Tobias Otterbring, 2023. "Subjective socioeconomic status and income inequality are associated with self-reported morality across 67 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    4. repec:osf:socarx:xf32m_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Christian T. Elbæk & Panagiotis Mitkidis & Lene Aarøe & Tobias Otterbring, 2023. "Author Correction: Subjective socioeconomic status and income inequality are associated with self-reported morality across 67 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-1, December.
    6. Emma Pierson & Camelia Simoiu & Jan Overgoor & Sam Corbett-Davies & Daniel Jenson & Amy Shoemaker & Vignesh Ramachandran & Phoebe Barghouty & Cheryl Phillips & Ravi Shroff & Sharad Goel, 2020. "A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 736-745, July.
    7. Christopher J. Bryan & Elizabeth Tipton & David S. Yeager, 2021. "Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 980-989, August.
    8. Andrea C. Morales & On Amir & Leonard Lee, 2017. "Keeping It Real in Experimental Research—Understanding When, Where, and How to Enhance Realism and Measure Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 465-476.
    9. Colin Bolger, P. & Walters, Glenn D., 2019. "The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 93-99.
    10. Wood, George & Tyler, Tom & Papachristos, Andrew V & Roth, Jonathan & Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C., 2021. "Revised findings for "Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers"," SocArXiv xf32m, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    2. Otterbring, Tobias & Folwarczny, Michał, 2024. "Social validation, reciprocation, and sustainable orientation: Cultivating “clean†codes of conduct through social influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Yu, Shengsheng & Jin, Hang & Jin, Chunhua & Huang, Jian & Li, Jianliang & Wang, Bin, 2025. "How is merchant gang culture conducive to increasing enterprises’ common prosperity?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Tiganis, Antonios & Chrysochou, Polymeros & Mitkidis, Panagiotis & Krystallis, Athanasios, 2025. "Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Kelly Kirkland & Paul a M van Lange & Drew Gorenz & Khandis Blake & Catherine E Amiot & Liisi Ausmees & Peter Baguma & Oumar Barry & Maja Becker & Michal Bilewicz & Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat & Robert, 2024. "High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization," Post-Print hal-04670509, HAL.
    6. Susan Hanisch & Dustin Eirdosh, 2023. "Behavioral Science and Education for Sustainable Development: Towards Metacognitive Competency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Muhammad Junaid Shahid Hasni & Faruk Anıl Konuk & Tobias Otterbring, 2025. "Anxious Altruism: Virtue Signaling Mediates the Impact of Attachment Style on Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior and Prosocial Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 603-637, January.
    8. Colin Campbell & Sean Sands & Brent McFerran & Alexis Mavrommatis, 2025. "Diversity representation in advertising," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 588-616, March.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:fqmdu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sibilla Di Guida & Ido Erev & Davide Marchiori, 2014. "Cross Cultural Differences in Decisions from Experience: Evidence from Denmark, Israel and Taiwain," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-16, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Hind Dib‐slamani & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2021. "Is theft considered less severe when the victim is a foreign company?," Post-Print hal-03340844, HAL.
    12. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Uz Zaman, Qamar & Zhao, Yuhuan & Zaman, Shah & Batool, Kiran & Nasir, Rabiya, 2024. "Reviewing energy efficiency and environmental consciousness in the minerals industry Amidst digital transition: A comprehensive review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Kyriaki Remoundou & Drichoutis Andreas & Phoebe Koundouri, 2010. "Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?," DEOS Working Papers 1028, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    15. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    16. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    17. John Hulland & Mark Houston, 2021. "The importance of behavioral outcomes," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 437-440, May.
    18. Freeman Wu & Martin Reimann & Gratiana Pol & C. Whan Park, 2023. "The scarcity of beauty: how and why product aesthetics mobilize consumer acquisition effort," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1245-1265, November.
    19. Plante, Charles & Lassoued, Rim & Phillips, Peter W.B., 2017. "The Social Determinants of Cognitive Bias: The Effects of Low Capability on Decision Making in a Framing Experiment," SocArXiv u62cx, Center for Open Science.
    20. Thomas S. Dee & Emily K. Penner, 2021. "My Brother's Keeper? The Impact of Targeted Educational Supports," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1171-1196, September.
    21. Nicolas Jacquemet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2014. "What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 243-264, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55709-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.