IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3813-3825.html

Are Women on Boards Associated With Disclosure Asymmetry? Evidence From Environmental and Social Disclosures in S&P 500 Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Nitin Jain

Abstract

As Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures gain prominence among stakeholders, regulators, and investors, attention needs to be paid not just to their extent but also to their balance. While prior research has explored the board‐related drivers of overall ESG disclosure and its impact on firm performance, the board‐level antecedents of asymmetry between environmental and social disclosures remain underexamined. Many firms disproportionately emphasize one dimension, creating imbalances in sustainability communication. Concurrently, debates continue over whether women appointed to corporate boards, often during periods of adversity, have meaningful influence over governance outcomes. This study investigates whether board female representation is associated with reduced asymmetry between environmental and social disclosures. Grounded in signaling, institutional, and agency theories, we employ panel data from S&P 500 firms spanning 2016–2022. Our results show that higher female representation on boards is linked to relatively stronger environmental disclosures, though this relationship exhibits diminishing returns at higher levels of women representation. Additionally, we find that larger board size weakens this association, while board age has no significant moderating effect. These findings contribute to governance and ESG literature by highlighting how female‐centric boards shape sustainability communication strategies and by offering practical insights for firms seeking more integrated ESG reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitin Jain, 2026. "Are Women on Boards Associated With Disclosure Asymmetry? Evidence From Environmental and Social Disclosures in S&P 500 Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3813-3825, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3813-3825
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70367
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino, 2020. "Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: an agency theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1152-1163, March.
    2. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    3. Serfling, Matthew A., 2014. "CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 251-273.
    4. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2008. "Boards: Does one size fit all," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 329-356, February.
    5. Amir Gholami & John Sands & Habib Ur Rahman, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Value Generation: Is the Financial Industry Different?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Elliroma Gardiner, 2024. "What’s age got to do with it? The effect of board member age diversity: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 65-92, February.
    7. Alessandra Rigolini & Morten Huse, 2021. "Women and Multiple Board Memberships: Social Capital and Institutional Pressure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 443-459, March.
    8. Caputo, Fabio & Fasiello, Roberta, 2024. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting and accountability in the utilities sector: Research paths and policy directions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Patrick Velte, 2024. "Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3397-3421, May.
    10. Ans Kolk, 2008. "Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Sumit Lodhia, 2014. "Why Do Companies Not Produce Sustainability Reports?," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 124-124, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman & Ruoyun Zhao, 2018. "CEO characteristics and firm valuation: a quantile regression analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(1), pages 133-151, March.
    2. Chenglong Zheng & Roy Kouwenberg, 2019. "A Bibliometric Review of Global Research on Corporate Governance and Board Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Gema C. Fleitas‐Castillo & Devora Peña‐Martel & Jerónimo Pérez‐Alemán & Domingo Javier Santana‐Martín, 2024. "Board gender diversity and corporate social irresponsibility in a dominant owner context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5122-5138, November.
    4. Muhammad Farooq & Hussain Muhammad, 2025. "Climate Governance and Sustainability Reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5430-5445, July.
    5. Ahmed, Shaker & Ranta, Mikko & Vähämaa, Emilia & Vähämaa, Sami, 2023. "Facial attractiveness and CEO compensation: Evidence from the banking industry," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Lucy W. Lu, 2021. "The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 193-206, September.
    7. Nguyen, Tuan & Nguyen, An & Nguyen, Mau & Truong, Thuyen, 2021. "Is national governance quality a key moderator of the boardroom gender diversity–firm performance relationship? International evidence from a multi-hierarchical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 370-390.
    8. Miriam Schwartz-Ziv & Ekaterina Volkova, 2025. "Is Blockholder Diversity Detrimental?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1356-1390, February.
    9. Phuong Bui & Phuc Nguyen, 2025. "Unveiling the Dynamics: Corporate Governance’s Impact on Firm Performance in Vietnam’s Thriving Market Landscape," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9095-9122, June.
    10. Gopalan, Radhakrishnan & Gormley, Todd A. & Kalda, Ankit, 2021. "It’s not so bad: Director bankruptcy experience and corporate risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 261-292.
    11. Musa Ghazwani, 2025. "Institutional and Critical Mass Theories in Action: How Executive Diversity and Global Anti‐Corruption Initiatives Impact ESG Performance in G20 Firms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 665-686, November.
    12. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.
    13. Qida Hu & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe, 2024. "CFO Demographics and Working Capital Management in China," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 23(1), pages 56-82, March.
    14. Bhagavatula, Suresh & Bhalla, Manaswini & Goel, Manisha & Vissa, Balagopal, 2023. "Social diversity in corporate boards and firm outcomes," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Nguyen, Thao & Bai, Min & Hou, Yang & Vu, Manh-Chien, 2021. "Corporate governance and dynamics capital structure: evidence from Vietnam," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. D. G. DeBoskey & Yan Luo & Linying Zhou, 2019. "CEO power, board oversight, and earnings announcement tone," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 657-680, February.
    17. Shen, Huayu & Xiong, Hao & Zheng, Shaofeng & Hou, Fei, 2021. "Chief executive officer (CEO)’s rural origin and internal control quality," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 441-452.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/69eil0vrec871ooabetqvq0okj is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Chanchal Chatterjee & Tirthankar Nag, 2023. "Do women on boards enhance firm performance? Evidence from top Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 155-167, June.
    20. Sabeeh Ullah & Yasir Kamal, 2022. "Corporate Governance, Political Connections and Firm Performance: The Role of Political Regimes and Size," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(4), pages 1031-1053, August.
    21. Fernando, Guy D. & Schneible, Richard A. & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Institutional ownership and women in the top management team," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3813-3825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.