IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p665-686.html

Institutional and Critical Mass Theories in Action: How Executive Diversity and Global Anti‐Corruption Initiatives Impact ESG Performance in G20 Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Musa Ghazwani

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of executive cultural diversity (ECD) and executive gender diversity (EGD), besides the global anti‐corruption initiatives, on ESG performance among G20 firms. The paper investigates data extracted from Refinitiv Eikon of 117,305 observations ranging from 2005 to 2022. Distinctively applying ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) to examine this association. These methods support robustness tests, including FE and RE, and generalized method of moments (GMM) methods to address concerns such as heteroscedasticity, clustering, and endogeneity in cross‐country regressions. The results confirm that companies with executives from diverse cultural backgrounds who are committed to global anti‐corruption initiatives, such as the Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) Anti‐corruption Convention and the United Nations Global Compact, perform better on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. The study's findings support theories such as institutional theory and critical mass theory, which state that diverse executives can enhance governance and promote sustainable business practices. Implications for corporate executives, policymakers, and investors include strategically promoting executive diversity and commitment to global anti‐corruption practices to improve ESG performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Musa Ghazwani, 2025. "Institutional and Critical Mass Theories in Action: How Executive Diversity and Global Anti‐Corruption Initiatives Impact ESG Performance in G20 Firms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 665-686, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:665-686
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rami Ibrahim A. Salem & Musa Ghazwani & Ali Meftah Gerged & Mark Whittington, 2023. "Anti-corruption disclosure quality and earnings management in the United Kingdom: the role of audit quality," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 528-563, May.
    2. Walid Ben-Amar & Millicent Chang & Philip McIlkenny, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 369-383, May.
    3. Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar & Lara Al‐Haddad, 2023. "Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2789-2810, July.
    4. Giuseppe Sannino & Manuela Lucchese & Giovanni Zampone & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Cultural dimensions, Global Reporting Initiatives commitment, and corporate social responsibility issues: New evidence from Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development banks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1653-1663, July.
    5. Akrum Helfaya & Rebecca Morris & Ahmed Aboud, 2023. "Investigating the Factors That Determine the ESG Disclosure Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Krista B. Lewellyn & Maureen I. Muller-Kahle, 2020. "The Corporate Board Glass Ceiling: The Role of Empowerment and Culture in Shaping Board Gender Diversity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 329-346, August.
    7. Jasmin Joecks & Kerstin Pull & Karin Vetter, 2013. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 61-72, November.
    8. David Roodman, 2009. "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(1), pages 86-136, March.
    9. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    10. Akrum Helfaya & Tantawy Moussa, 2017. "Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1061-1077, December.
    11. Badi H. Baltagi, 2015. "What is Econometrics?," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Solutions Manual for Econometrics, edition 3, chapter 0, pages 1-4, Springer.
    12. Ans Kolk, 2008. "Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Muhammad Usman & Jacinta Nwachukwu & Ernest Ezeani & Rami Ibrahim A. Salem & Bilal Bilal & Frank Obenpong Kwabi, 2023. "Audit quality and classification shifting: evidence from UK and Germany," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 448-475, August.
    14. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    15. Bita Mashayekhi & Kaveh Asiaei & Zabihollah Rezaee & Amin Jahangard & Milad Samavat & Saeid Homayoun, 2024. "The relative importance of ESG pillars: A two‐step machine learning and analytical framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5404-5420, October.
    16. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rami Salem & Musa Ghazwani & Waleed Alshaer, 2025. "ESG Performance–Stock Price Volatility Nexus: The Moderating Effect of Board Cultural Diversity in G20 Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8172-8193, November.
    2. Jagvinder Singh & Varda Sardana & Shubham Singhania, 2024. "Beyond compliance: the business case for gender diversity on boards and sustainability reporting in India," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2284-2293, June.
    3. ABM Fazle Rahi, 2025. "Unpacking women’s power on corporate boards: gender reward in board composition," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 64-80, March.
    4. Claudio Nuber & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1958-1992, May.
    5. Jihad Al-Okaily & Salma Naueihed, 2025. "Boardroom balance: exploring the non-linear impact of female board representation on anti-corruption disclosures in UK firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(2), pages 573-602, June.
    6. Paolo Agnese & Francesca Romana Arduino & Massimiliano Cerciello & Simone Taddeo, 2024. "Does board knowledge matter for ESG performance in the European banking industry?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4454-4468, September.
    7. Abdulaziz Al Naim & Abdulrahman Alomair, 2025. "The role of female representation in enhancing audit quality: Insights from Saudi Arabia’s emerging market," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Farzan Yahya & Li Meiling & Chien‐Chiang Lee & Muhammad Waqas & Zhang Shaohua, 2022. "Gender diversity, sustainability reporting, CEO overconfidence, and efficient risk‐taking: Evidence from South Asian agri‐food industry," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(3), pages 219-238, September.
    9. Mushtaq Hussain Khan & Inam Ul Haq & Muhammad Umer Azeem & Abdul Ghafoor, 2025. "Climate Change Initiatives, Environmental Management Training, and Firm Performance: The Trickle‐Down Effect of Board‐Level Gender Diversity on Gender Diversity in the top Management Team," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 9274-9300, November.
    10. Ammar Ali Gull & Ammar Abid & Rashid Latief & Muhammad Usman, 2021. "Women on board and auditors’ assessment of the risk of material misstatement," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 679-708, December.
    11. Chanchal Chatterjee & Tirthankar Nag, 2023. "Do women on boards enhance firm performance? Evidence from top Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 155-167, June.
    12. Woon Leong Lin, 2018. "Do Firm’s Organisational Slacks Influence the Relationship between Corporate Lobbying and Corporate Financial Performance? More Is Not Always Better," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Adela Socol & Iulia Cristina Iuga, 2025. "Does democracy matter in banking performance? Exploring the linkage between democracy, economic freedom and banking performance in the European Union member states," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 86-116, January.
    14. Mohamed M. Sraieb & Lasha Labadze, 2022. "A Dynamic Perspective on the Gender Diversity–Firms’ Environmental Performances Nexus: Evidence from the Energy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Eman F. Attia & Sameh Yassen & Ahmed Chafai & Ahmed Qotb, 2024. "The impact of board gender diversity on the accrual/real earnings management practice: evidence from an emerging market," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Đặng, Rey & Houanti, L’Hocine & Reddy, Krishna & Simioni, Michel, 2020. "Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 168-181.
    17. Wenqin Li & John Ziyang Zhang & Rong Ding, 2023. "Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 551-583, March.
    18. Pant, Abhay & Nidugala, Ganesh Kumar, 2022. "Board characteristics and efficiency of value added by banks: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Pathan, Shams & Faff, Robert, 2013. "Does board structure in banks really affect their performance?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1573-1589.
    20. Amir Allam & Tantawy Moussa & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2024. "Examining the relationship between CEO power and modern slavery disclosures: The moderating role of board gender diversity in UK companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8067-8085, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:665-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.