IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beh/jbepv1/v6y2022is1p23-40.html

A literature review of bullshit receptivity: Perspectives for an informed policy making against misinformation

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Iacobucci

    (Laboratory of Behavioral Economics (BE-Lab) Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara)

  • Roberta De Cicco

    (Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST))

Abstract

Since the publication of Pennycook and colleagues' (2015) paper on the reception of pseudo-profound bullshit, the concept of bullshit (BS) receptivity has slowly gained interest as an individual characteristic of people with the tendency to be overly receptive of and sensitive to fake claims. This paper seeks to identify and discuss peer-reviewed literature that applies BS receptivity scales, to better define their role within the bigger picture of the characteristics of those individuals particularly prone to the reception of a whole range of outlandish beliefs. Considering the cross-cutting nature of the issue, we prompt the need for further empirical and applicative research, and underline that - with BS receptivity belonging to the set of determinants contributing to flawed decision-making in terms of spotting genuine from fake content - greater involvement of behavioral economists is desirable. We call for such involvement not only within the BS debate, but also in assisting policymakers in their hard task of developing tailored policy responses and digital literacy interventions to combat misinformation and disinformation at its roots.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Iacobucci & Roberta De Cicco, 2022. "A literature review of bullshit receptivity: Perspectives for an informed policy making against misinformation," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(S1), pages 23-40, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:6:y:2022:i:s1:p:23-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-6-S1-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Matasick & Carlotta Alfonsi & Alessandro Bellantoni, 2020. "Governance responses to disinformation: How open government principles can inform policy options," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 39, OECD Publishing.
    2. Cass R. Sunstein & Richard H. Thaler, 2003. "Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 48(Jun).
    3. On Amir & Dan Ariely & Alan Cooke & David Dunning & Nicholas Epley & Uri Gneezy & Botond Koszegi & Donald Lichtenstein & Nina Mazar & Sendhil Mullainathan & Drazen Prelec & Eldar Shafir & Jose Silva, 2005. "Psychology, Behavioral Economics, and Public Policy," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 443-454, December.
    4. Romer, Daniel & Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, 2020. "Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    5. Anthony Evans & Willem Sleegers & Žan Mlakar, 2020. "Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 401-412, May.
    6. Sterling, Joanna & Jost, John T. & Pennycook, Gordon, 2016. "Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 352-360, July.
    7. Vojtech Pisl & Jan Volavka & Edita Chvojkova & Katerina Cechova & Gabriela Kavalirova & Jan Vevera, 2021. "Dissociation, Cognitive Reflection and Health Literacy Have a Modest Effect on Belief in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Craig Dalton, 2016. "Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on "On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit"," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 121-122, January.
    9. Gordon Pennycook & James Allan Cheyne & Nathaniel Barr & Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang, 2015. "On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(6), pages 549-563, November.
    10. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    11. Joffrey Fuhrer & Florian Cova, 2020. "“Quick and dirty†: Intuitive cognitive style predicts trust in Didier Raoult and his hydroxychloroquine-based treatment against COVID-19," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 889-908, November.
    12. Gordon Pennycook & Ziv Epstein & Mohsen Mosleh & Antonio A. Arechar & Dean Eckles & David G. Rand, 2021. "Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7855), pages 590-595, April.
    13. Joanna Sterling & John T. Jost & Gordon Pennycook, 2016. "Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 352-360, July.
    14. Maurizio Massaro & John Dumay & James Guthrie, 2016. "On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 767-801, June.
    15. Persson, Emil & Tinghög, Gustav, 2020. "Opportunity cost neglect in public policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 301-312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serena Iacobucci & Roberta De Cicco, 2022. "Erratum to "A Literature Review of Bullshit Receptivity: Perspectives for an Informed Policy Making Against Misinformation"," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(1), pages 55-56, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Mulukom, Valerie & Pummerer, Lotte J. & Alper, Sinan & Bai, Hui & Čavojová, Vladimíra & Farias, Jessica & Kay, Cameron S. & Lazarevic, Ljiljana B. & Lobato, Emilio J.C. & Marinthe, Gaëlle & Pavela, 2022. "Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Alexander C. Walker & Martin Harry Turpin & Jennifer A. Stolz & Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Derek J. Koehler, 2019. "Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(2), pages 109-119, March.
    3. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:720-744 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Borozan, Miloš & Loreta, Cannito & Riccardo, Palumbo, 2022. "Eye-tracking for the study of financial decision-making: A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    5. Saura, José Ramón & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Iturricha-Fernández, Agustín, 2021. "Ethical design in social media: Assessing the main performance measurements of user online behavior modification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 271-281.
    6. Martin Harry Turpin & Alexander C. Walker & Mane Kara-Yakoubian & Nina N. Gabert & Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Jennifer A. Stolz, 2019. "Bullshit makes the art grow profounder," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(6), pages 658-670, November.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0201474 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Valentin Guigon & Marie Claire Villeval & Jean-Claude Dreher, 2024. "Metacognition biases information seeking in assessing ambiguous news," Post-Print hal-04848999, HAL.
    9. Manoj Kumar Dash & Chetanya Singh & Gayatri Panda & Diksha Sharma, 2023. "ICT for sustainability and socio-economic development in fishery: a bibliometric analysis and future research agenda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2201-2233, March.
    10. Secinaro, Silvana & Lanzalonga, Federico & Oppioli, Michele & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2025. "The effects of disruptive technologies on accountability in fintech industry: Using bibliometric analysis to develop a research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Assunta Di Vaio & Sabrina Palladino & Elisa Van Engelenhoven, 2025. "Digital Twins nei Sistemi Portuali e il contributo di GHG accounting: Una review della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 211-236.
    12. Joanna Sterling & John T. Jost & Gordon Pennycook, 2016. "Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 352-360, July.
    13. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Sophisticated deviants: Intelligence and radical economic attitudes," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Onurcan Yilmaz & Sinan Alper, 2019. "The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(2), pages 156-169, March.
    15. Suzanne Hoogeveen & Julia M. Haaf & Joseph A. Bulbulia & Robert M. Ross & Ryan McKay & Sacha Altay & Theiss Bendixen & Renatas Berniūnas & Arik Cheshin & Claudio Gentili & Raluca Georgescu & Will M. G, 2022. "The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 523-535, April.
    16. repec:plo:pone00:0153419 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Luca Mazzara & Francesco Bergamaschi & Giulia Leoni, 2022. "Gestione integrata dei dati e misurazione della performance nei network inter-municipali: un?analisi sistematica della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 91-116.
    18. Gordon Pennycook & James Allan Cheyne & Nathaniel Barr & Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang, 2016. "It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 123-125, January.
    19. Otero, Inmaculada & Salgado, Jesús F. & Moscoso, Silvia, 2022. "Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Maria Angela Manzi & Antonio Netti & Christian Favino & Fabrizia Sarto, 2025. "Financial accounting in family business: a systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(1), pages 231-275, March.
    21. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The overselling of globalization," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 129-137, July.
    22. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    23. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:6:y:2022:i:s1:p:23-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SABE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sabeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.