IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i15p742-755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Mango Production in Kitui County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Ebenezer Bukekhe

    (Weihenstephan University of Applied Sciences, Triesdorf, Germany)

  • Joseph N. Nzomoi

    (South Eastern Kenya University)

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is produced and consumed globally, with value addition offering significant economic benefits (Kundu et al, 2020). In Kitui County, post-Covid efforts demonstrated how mango processing can enhance economic performance and reduce poverty (Mutua et al, 2022). However, traditional production and marketing methods have hindered the adoption of more efficient and innovative approaches (FAO, 2019). The focus of this study was an economic analysis of mango production in Kitui County, Kenya. The main objective was to conduct an economic analysis of mango production in Kitui County, Kenya. Specific objectives included; to identify the main resources influencing the production of mango in Kitui County, to determine whether farmers efficiently utilize the identified resources and finally to determine which of the identified resources significantly influences mango production. Primary data was collected via questionnaires, while secondary data was sourced from relevant literature. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 30.0. Findings revealed that most mango farmers were smallholders on 1–20-acre farms, with 84.4% of farmers solely dependent on agriculture and livestock for their livelihoods. Popular mango varieties included Apple, Tommy, Kent (exotic), Ngowe, and Dodo (local), while Vandyke, Keit, Boribo, and Batawi were less preferred. Pest management methods varied, with 37.4% using Integrated Pest Management (IPM), 17.5% biological control, 26.1% chemical control, and 19.1% not using any method—largely due to a lack of consistent extension services for 70% of farmers. Additionally, 75% of mango growers did not engage in value addition, while 25% processed mangoes into juice and flakes through cooperatives. The study found that investments in fertilizer, labor, transport, and agricultural technology significantly increased profitability. The study recommends that research organizations such as KARLO should establish certified propagation centers to provide farmers with affordable, high-quality varieties like Kent and Keitt in order to enhance mango production. It also recommends that government financial support should be directed through cooperatives to help farmers invest in essential infrastructure such as irrigation systems and value-added processing plants; that private sector and NGOs involvement should be encouraged to supply subsidized inputs and promote sustainable farming practices; capacity building programs as well as the adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) should be promoted to ensure environmentally sustainable and high-quality mango production.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Ebenezer Bukekhe & Joseph N. Nzomoi, 2025. "An Economic Analysis of Mango Production in Kitui County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(15), pages 742-755, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:742-755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-15/742-755.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/an-economic-analysis-of-mango-production-in-kitui-county-kenya/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1255-1268.
    2. Thomas Reardon & Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool-Tasie & Bart Minten, 2021. "Quiet Revolution by SMEs in the midstream of value chains in developing regions: wholesale markets, wholesalers, logistics, and processing," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1577-1594, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lovemore C. Gwiriri & James Bennett & Cletos Mapiye & Sara Burbi, 2021. "Emerging from Below? Understanding the Livelihood Trajectories of Smallholder Livestock Farmers in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    2. K. Gayathri Reddy & Varsha, P. S. & L. N. Sudheendra Rao & Amit Kumar, 2019. "Exploring dimension, perceived individual tension and capacity building measure of women empowerment in India," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(5), pages 111-131, May.
    3. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    4. Carlos Omar Trejo-Pech & Roselia Servín-Juárez & Álvaro Reyes-Duarte, 2023. "What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Afful-Dadzie, Eric & Lartey, Samuel Odame & Clottey, David Nii Klote, 2022. "Agricultural information systems acceptance and continuance in rural communities: A consumption values perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Christina Handschuch & Meike Wollni, 2016. "Improved production systems for traditional food crops: the case of finger millet in western Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 783-797, August.
    7. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    8. Chacha, Peter Wankuru & Kirui, Benard Kipyegon & Wiedemann, Verena, 2024. "Supply Chains in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Kenya’s Production Network," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Hayatullah Ahmadzai, 2018. "Factor market participation and tests for separability in Afghanistan," Discussion Papers 2018-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    10. Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro & Narciso Arcas-Lario & Jos Bijman & Miguel Hernández-Espallardo, 2024. "The role of agricultural cooperatives in mitigating opportunism in the context of complying with sustainability requirements: empirical evidence from Spain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Xiang Li & Sun Sheng Han & Hao Wu, 2019. "Urban consolidation, power relations, and dilapidated residential redevelopment in Mutoulong, Shenzhen, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2802-2819, October.
    12. Zhanping Hu & Qian Forrest Zhang, 2024. "Alternative agrifood systems and the economic sustainability of farmers' cooperatives: The Chinese experience," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7447-7460, December.
    13. Mdoda, Lelethu & Obi, Ajuruchukwu Ob, . "Analysis of profitability of smallholder irrigated food plots in the eastern cape province of South Africa," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 53(3).
    14. Chiputwa, Brian & Spielman, David J. & Qaim, Matin, 2015. "Food Standards, Certification, and Poverty among Coffee Farmers in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 400-412.
    15. Prihantini, Campina Illa & A.R., Nuhfil Hanani & Syafrial & Asmara, Rosihan, 2024. "Exploring the relation between farmer organization and welfare using propensity score matching approach: Evidence from madurese traditional salt farmers in indonesia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 14(03).
    16. Abigail Gbemisola. Adeyonu & Timothy O. Agboola & Blessing O. Fadeyi & Bashir A. Tijani & Elizabeth Fisayo Oladapo, 2021. "Influence of membership of cooperative society on farmers’ income in rural areas of Kwara State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(3), pages 84-89, March.
    17. Onyango, Mercy & Otieno, David Jakinda & Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo & Ojiem, John, 2016. "An economic analysis of grain legumes profitability in Nandi County, Kenya," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246921, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    18. Dinesh Dhakal & David O’Brien & Peter Mueser, 2021. "Government Policy and Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives: A Case Study in Chitwan District, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Margaret A. McEwan & Moses S. Matui & Sarah Mayanja & Sam Namanda & Kwame Ogero, 2023. "Gender dynamics in seed systems: female makeover or male takeover of specialized sweetpotato seed production, in Lake Zone Tanzania?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 693-710, June.
    20. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:742-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.