IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i15p742-755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Mango Production in Kitui County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Ebenezer Bukekhe

    (Weihenstephan University of Applied Sciences, Triesdorf, Germany)

  • Joseph N. Nzomoi

    (South Eastern Kenya University)

Abstract

Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is produced and consumed globally, with value addition offering significant economic benefits (Kundu et al, 2020). In Kitui County, post-Covid efforts demonstrated how mango processing can enhance economic performance and reduce poverty (Mutua et al, 2022). However, traditional production and marketing methods have hindered the adoption of more efficient and innovative approaches (FAO, 2019). The focus of this study was an economic analysis of mango production in Kitui County, Kenya. The main objective was to conduct an economic analysis of mango production in Kitui County, Kenya. Specific objectives included; to identify the main resources influencing the production of mango in Kitui County, to determine whether farmers efficiently utilize the identified resources and finally to determine which of the identified resources significantly influences mango production. Primary data was collected via questionnaires, while secondary data was sourced from relevant literature. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 30.0. Findings revealed that most mango farmers were smallholders on 1–20-acre farms, with 84.4% of farmers solely dependent on agriculture and livestock for their livelihoods. Popular mango varieties included Apple, Tommy, Kent (exotic), Ngowe, and Dodo (local), while Vandyke, Keit, Boribo, and Batawi were less preferred. Pest management methods varied, with 37.4% using Integrated Pest Management (IPM), 17.5% biological control, 26.1% chemical control, and 19.1% not using any method—largely due to a lack of consistent extension services for 70% of farmers. Additionally, 75% of mango growers did not engage in value addition, while 25% processed mangoes into juice and flakes through cooperatives. The study found that investments in fertilizer, labor, transport, and agricultural technology significantly increased profitability. The study recommends that research organizations such as KARLO should establish certified propagation centers to provide farmers with affordable, high-quality varieties like Kent and Keitt in order to enhance mango production. It also recommends that government financial support should be directed through cooperatives to help farmers invest in essential infrastructure such as irrigation systems and value-added processing plants; that private sector and NGOs involvement should be encouraged to supply subsidized inputs and promote sustainable farming practices; capacity building programs as well as the adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) should be promoted to ensure environmentally sustainable and high-quality mango production.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Ebenezer Bukekhe & Joseph N. Nzomoi, 2025. "An Economic Analysis of Mango Production in Kitui County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(15), pages 742-755, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:742-755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-15/742-755.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/an-economic-analysis-of-mango-production-in-kitui-county-kenya/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:15:p:742-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.