IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i19p155-167.html

“Bridging the Information Gap: Corporate Governance, Transparency, and Firm Value in Global and Emerging Capital Marketsâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Avinash M A

    (Mysuru Royal Institute of Technology)

  • Dr. R Mahesh

    (Mysuru Royal Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Capital markets attain allocative efficiency only when investors have access to credible, timely, and comparable information regarding corporate performance and governance standards. Persistent information asymmetry—arising from unequal access to firm-specific knowledge between insiders and external stakeholders—continues to impede efficient pricing, particularly within emerging economies where disclosure frameworks and enforcement mechanisms remain uneven. This article consolidates empirical and theoretical insights from both developed and emerging capital markets to investigate how corporate governance structures and transparency practices jointly influence information asymmetry and firm valuation. Grounded in agency theory, signaling theory, and the economics of information asymmetry, the study synthesizes findings from markets such as India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Bangladesh, and selected advanced economies to identify conditions under which governance and disclosure reforms yield observable valuation gains. The review reveals substantial heterogeneity across firm size, sector, ownership concentration, and index inclusion, demonstrating that large, visible firms and entities with high investor information demand experience the greatest benefits from strengthened governance and enhanced disclosure. By advancing an integrated conceptual framework that links governance and transparency to firm value through mediating channels (liquidity, cost of capital) and contextual moderators (institutional quality, enforcement intensity), the paper delineates critical boundary conditions shaping policy effectiveness. The study concludes by outlining a forward-looking research agenda and offering actionable insights for regulators, corporate leaders, and investors navigating the evolving governance–transparency–value nexus in globally interconnected capital markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Avinash M A & Dr. R Mahesh, 2026. "“Bridging the Information Gap: Corporate Governance, Transparency, and Firm Value in Global and Emerging Capital Marketsâ€," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(19), pages 155-167, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:19:p:155-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss19-pg155-167-202602_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/bridging-the-information-gap-corporate-governance-transparency-and-firm-value-in-global-and-emerging-capital-markets/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Saleem Alatawi & Zaidi Mat Daud & Jalila Johari, 2025. "Integrated reporting and firm value: moderating role of CEO integrity in the context of GCC countries," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2462273-246, December.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. Li, Weiping & Li, Tingyu & Jiang, Dequan & Zhang, Xuezhi, 2024. "Bridging the information gap: How digitalization shapes stock price informativeness," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chilosi, Alberto & Damiani, Mirella, 2007. "Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance," MPRA Paper 2334, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gilberto E. Arce & Edgar Robles C., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Costa Rica," Research Department Publications 3218, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    3. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    4. Natalya Zelenyuk & Robert Faff & Shams Pathan, 2021. "The impact of voluntary capital adequacy disclosure on bank lending and liquidity creation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3915-3935, September.
    5. Theodore E. Christensen & Hang Pei & Spencer R. Pierce & Liang Tan, 2019. "Non-GAAP reporting following debt covenant violations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 629-664, June.
    6. Boubakri, Narjess & Ghouma, Hatem, 2010. "Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2481-2499, October.
    7. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Jacob, Marcus, 2010. "Culture, agency costs, and dividends," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-339, September.
    8. Abdul Aziz, Ahmad Faizal, 2012. "Shariah Governance: Challenges Ahead," MPRA Paper 47772, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. A. A. Drakos & F. V. Bekiris, 2010. "Endogeneity and the relationship between board structure and firm performance: a simultaneous equation analysis for the Athens Stock Exchange," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 387-401.
    10. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Ichiro Iwasaki & Satoshi Mizobata & Alexander Muravyev, 2018. "Ownership dynamics and firm performance in an emerging economy: a meta-analysis of the Russian literature," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 290-333, May.
    12. Tarek Roshdy Gebba & Mohamed Gamal Aboelmaged, 2016. "Corporate Governance of UAE Financial Institutions: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7.
    13. Rym Ayadi & Emrah Arbak & Willem Pieter De Groen, 2012. "Executive Compensation and Risk-taking in European Banking," Chapters, in: James R. Barth & Chen Lin & Clas Wihlborg (ed.), Research Handbook on International Banking and Governance, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Randall Morck, 2011. "Finance and Governance in Developing Economies," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 375-406, December.
    15. Lucian Bebchuk & Reinier Kraakman & George Triantis, 1999. "Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and the Dual Class Equity: The Creation and Agency Costs of Seperating Control from Cash Flow Rights," NBER Working Papers 6951, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Wang, Peipei & Wen, Yuanji & Singh, Harminder, 2017. "The high-volume return premium: Does it exist in the Chinese stock market?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB), pages 323-336.
    17. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    18. Heinrich, Ralph P., 1999. "Complementarities in Corporate Governance - A Survey of the Literature with Special Emphasis on Japan," Kiel Working Papers 947, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    19. He, Wei & Kyaw, NyoNyo A., 2018. "Ownership structure and investment decisions of Chinese SOEs," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-57.
    20. Vanessa Carvalho Pereira & Antonio Gualberto Pereira & José Sérgio Casé Oliveira, 2023. "Influence of ownership structure on the choice of Big Four independent auditors," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 316-326, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:19:p:155-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.