Alliance Decision-Making Of Sme: Phases And Influence Factors
Experience of some countries shows how alliances have helped SME (small and medium enterprises) to be successful; however, this strategy is still not very popular in many other countries. Managing alliances is no more difficult than deciding to enter into such a cooperative relationship. Many researchers, particularly in the advanced countries have studied strategic alliances with special emphasis on large enterprises and focused as a way of internationalization but there is still a gap of references to understand how this decision is taken from the SME: what makes SME to be engaged in alliances? which factors are playing an important role into this decision? The innovation of this research is to provide a framework of alliance decisionmaking process based on five phases as well as the identification of key factors that make SME to be engaged on alliances. The proposal is based on different perspectives from the social capital, mainly social exchange, and economic development into the alliances decision making particularly in SME. This research could be especially attractive to the different actors involved in SMEs: government; large enterprises, universities and Nongovernment organization in order to focus their effort on those weak phases or factors that may be potentially developed in a new way of joint working. The empirical data comes from a sample of Mexican SME. The preliminary results show that the perception of the enterprise competence and the identification of potential partners are critical phases into the alliance decision-making process. Although most of the entrepreneurs desire to be involved in alliance, the lacks of possession of information about alliances issues as well as the lack of trust are key factors that limit this decision.
Volume (Year): (2009)
Issue (Month): ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Str Horea nr. 7, Cluj-Napoca 400174|
Phone: 004 0264 599170
Fax: 004 0264 590110
Web page: http://www.tbs.ubbcluj.ro/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Marcel Fafchamps & Bart Minten, 2001. "Social Capital and Agricultural Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 680-685.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2009_4_4_diaz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cornelia Pop)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.