IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2023i2p136-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Government Regulation on Investment Activities in Agriculture of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Sviatoslav Kniaz
  • Nazar Podolchak
  • Yurii Dziurakh
  • Veronika Karkovska
  • Anatolii Kucher

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the main factors of state regulation that affect the efficiency of investment activities in agriculture of Ukraine. It is proved that the weakness of state regulation of investment activity in agriculture is the lack of a balanced long-term policy of economic development, which turns Ukraine into an agrarian state. The balance of payments deficit has been covered in recent years (2015–2019) due to exports of low value-added agricultural raw materials. Taking into account the fact that the world food market is constantly growing shortage of quality products, Ukraine has prospects to become a developed agro-industrial country in terms of stimulating investment in the processing of agricultural raw materials. Methodological tools for assessing the impact of government action on key indicators of investment activity in the agricultural sector of Ukraine have been developed. The level of impact of the effectiveness of state regulation with the use of such tools as financing of investment management bodies and financial incentives for investment development is the highest compared to the effectiveness of other instruments of state regulation. Rising government spending on investment management and financial assistance to farmers has a positive impact on the dynamics of return on investment in agriculture. The practical value of the developed methodological tools lies in the possibility of their use by managers of agricultural enterprises to forecast their condition, taking into account the influence of factors of state regulation related to ensuring the efficiency of investment activities in the agriculture of Ukraine. Given that forecasting is reduced to one resulting parameter, the proposed toolkit is easy to use. It should be used to justify regulatory decisions, in particular, on investment processes in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nazar Podolchak & Yurii Dziurakh & Veronika Karkovska & Anatolii Kucher, 2023. "Development of Government Regulation on Investment Activities in Agriculture of Ukraine," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 136-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2023:i:2:p:136-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2023/2023-2/08_Anatolii-Kucher.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmytriieva, Viktoriia & Sviatets, Yurii, 2021. "Turning points in agriculture development in Ukraine: results of analysis on the base of purified data," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(1), March.
    2. Mangirdas MORKUNAS & Artiom VOLKOV & Yuri BILAN & Agota Giedre RAIŠIENE, 2018. "The Role Of Government In Forming Agricultural Policy: Economic Resilience Measuring Index Exploited," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 111-131, December.
    3. Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2009. "Reforms, globalization, and endogenous agricultural structures," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 719-732, November.
    4. Sumets, Alexander & Kniaz, Sviatoslav & Heorhiadi, Nelli & Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Matsuk, Vasylyna, 2022. "Methodological toolkit for assessing the level of stability of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(1), March.
    5. T.M. Polushkina & S.A. Kochetkova & Yu.A. Akimova & N.A. Polushkin, 2016. "Government Control of Agrarian field of Economics in the Conditions of Global Challenge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 39-55.
    6. Deng, Haiyan & Hu, Ruifa & Pray, Carl & Jin, Yanhong, 2019. "Impact of government policies on private R&D investment in agricultural biotechnology: Evidence from chemical and pesticide firms in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 208-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kleemann, Linda & Thiele, Rainer, 2015. "Rural welfare implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Africa: A theoretical framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 269-279.
    2. Derek Byerlee & Klaus Deininger, 2013. "The Rise of Large Farms in Land-Abundant Countries: Do They Have a Future?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Stein T. Holden & Keijiro Otsuka & Klaus Deininger (ed.), Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa, chapter 14, pages 333-353, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Kosar, Nataliia & Kuzo, Nataliia & Binda, Jacek & Hayvanovych, Nataliya & Pytulyak, Nataliya, 2022. "Modeling of the factors influencing the dairy market in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    4. Ye Yuan & Ming Li & Congshan Tian & Yun Xu, 2023. "Measurements and Influencing Factors of New Rural Collective Economies’ Resilience toward Mountain Disasters in Indigent Areas: A Case Study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Otsuka, Keijiro, 2012. "Presidential Address at 27th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil : Food Insecurity, Income Inequality, and the Changing Comparative Advantage in World Agricultur," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 127068, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Fertö, Imre, 2014. "The Structural Transformation in Central and Eastern European Agriculture," CEI Working Paper Series 2014-9, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Damilola Giwa-Daramola & Harvey S. James, 2023. "COVID-19 and Microeconomic Resilience in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Study on Ethiopian and Nigerian Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Marten Graubner, 2018. "Lost in space? The effect of direct payments on land rental prices," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(2), pages 143-171.
    9. Swinnen, Johan & Kuijpers, Rob, 2019. "Value chain innovations for technology transfer in developing and emerging economies: Conceptual issues, typology, and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 298-309.
    10. Agnė Žičkienė & Rasa Melnikienė & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Artiom Volkov, 2022. "CAP Direct Payments and Economic Resilience of Agriculture: Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Bojnec, Štefan & Fertő, Imre & Jámbor, Attila & Tóth, József, 2010. "Institutions, policy reforms and efficiency in new member states from Centraland Eastern Europe," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52712, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    12. Jinho Choi & Nina Shin & Yong Sik Chang, 2021. "Strategic Investment Decisions for Emerging Technology Fields in the Health Care Sector Based on M&A Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Perekhozhuk, O. & Chezhia, G. & Glauben, T., 2018. "Testing for oligopsony power in the Kazakh grain processing industry: A Hall approach," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275964, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Dmytriieva, Viktoriia & Sviatets, Yurii, 2023. "Agricultural business in independent Ukraine: thirty-year dynamics of the reorganization process," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    15. A. Bailey & S. Davidova & P. Hazell, 2009. "Introduction to the special issue “small farms: decline or persistence?”," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 715-717, November.
    16. Hofman, Irna & Visser, Oane, 2014. "Geographies of transition: The political and geographical factors of agrarian change in Tajikistan," IAMO Discussion Papers 199945, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Rahman, Mahfuzur & Billah, Md Morsaline & Hack-Polay, Dieu & Alam, Ashraful, 2020. "The use of biotechnologies in textile processing and environmental sustainability: An emerging market context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Zhang, Cheng & Yao, Yangyang & Zhou, Han, 2023. "External technology dependence and manufacturing TFP: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Ren, Shenggang & Sun, Helin & Zhang, Tao, 2021. "Do environmental subsidies spur environmental innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Taras Gagalyuk, 2017. "Project Review: International Competence Center on Large Scale Agriculture at the Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 6(2), pages 147-150, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2023:i:2:p:136-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.