Students Attitudes Regarding The Ethics Of Earnings Management Activities: An Empirical Investigation
The objective of this paper is to assess the ethics of short-term earnings managementin a code-law country. In order to understand the morals of short-term earnings management weconducted a survey using students as respondents. Even if we found disagreement among ourrespondents, the findings of this study document that ethical acceptance of short-term earningsmanagement depends on the type of manipulation (e.g. accrual-based earnings management versusreal earnings management). Also, the results indicate that students with higher moral developmentevaluate short-term earnings management practices as less ethical and are less likely to accept it.The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications and suggestions for future research.
Volume (Year): 2 (2013)
Issue (Month): 15 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Leuz, Christian & Nanda, Dhananjay & Wysocki, Peter D., 2003. "Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 505-527, September.
- Wesley II, Curtis L. & Ndofor, Hermann Achidi, 2013. "The Great Escape: The Unaddressed Ethical Issue of Investor Responsibility for Corporate Malfeasance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(03), pages 443-475, July.
- Leonie Jooste, 2011. "A comparison of ethical perceptions of earnings-management practices," South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 422-435, December.
- Barbara Arel & Cathy Beaudoin & Anna Cianci, 2012. "The Impact of Ethical Leadership, the Internal Audit Function, and Moral Intensity on a Financial Reporting Decision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 351-366, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:15:p:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan-Constantin Danuletiu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.