IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v3y2017i1p40-49.html

Mega-clusters as a tool of interregional cooperation in tourists field

Author

Listed:
  • Kuznetsova, O. P.
  • Kuzmenko, A. A.
  • Yumaev, E. A.

Abstract

In order to diversify the Russian economy, it is necessary to pay great attention to the emerging sectors of the economy; with a systemic approach they are able to reveal their accumulated potential. Authors consider one of such industries to be the sphere of tourism. Russia has its own unique natural-recreational and cultural-historical potential, which is not fully utilized, and it is confirmed with the relevant statistics. The authors propose to accelerate the development of tourism by raising the level of interregional cooperation from the position of using coexisting competition and competitive coexistence in tourist mega-clusters. Due to the lack of financial resources for separate regions for the tourism development, the implementation of this approach is effective, as it allows achieving savings of money due to economies of scale. The phenomena of coexisting competition and competitive coexistence in the tourism sphere presuppose the unification of the different regions authorities’ efforts for the joint implementation of projects. Regions joining forces on the basis of coexisting competition and competitive coexistence within the mega-clusters will allow each administrative-territorial unit to develop and improve its competitive advantage by asking a stimulus to the development of the other participants. This approach makes it possible to obtain other positive effects noted in the study. Thus, findings broaden the knowledge about the phenomena of coexisting competition and competitive coexistence in the regional economy, about mega-clusters as tools for interregional interactions in the tourism sphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuznetsova, O. P. & Kuzmenko, A. A. & Yumaev, E. A., 2017. "Mega-clusters as a tool of interregional cooperation in tourists field," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 3(1), pages 40-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:40-49
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2017.3.1.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/47410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2017.3.1.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gnyawali, Devi R. & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2011. "Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 650-663, June.
    2. Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & McBeath, Bowen & Chuang, Emmeline & Pérez-Jolles, Monica & Wells, Rebecca, 2014. "Collaboration, competition, and co-opetition: Interorganizational dynamics between private child welfare agencies and child serving sectors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 113-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yadav, Neetu & Kumar, Roopesh & Malik, Ashish, 2022. "Global developments in coopetition research: A bibliometric analysis of research articles published between 2010 and 2020," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 495-508.
    2. Olga Kuznetsova & Arina Kuzmenko & Egor Yumaev, 2017. "Co-Opetition (Coexisting Competition and Competitive Coexistaence) in the Tourism Field in Siberian Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 237-248.
    3. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. György Jóna & Tamás Tóth, 2017. "Spatial Effects And Externalities Of The Rivals’ Networks In Hungary," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, CinTurs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 5(3), pages 189-207.
    5. Wang, I. Kim & Seidle, Russell, 2017. "The degree of technological innovation: A demand heterogeneity perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 166-177.
    6. Xina Yuan & Zhaoyang Guo & Jin Won Lee, 2020. "Good connections with rivals may weaken a firm’s competitive practices: The negative effect of competitor ties on market orientation practices and innovative performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 693-718, September.
    7. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    8. Carlos S Baradello & Andrea Salazzaro, 2012. "The Role of Imitation in Global High-Tech Product Development," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Innovat, pages 57-71.
    9. David B. Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Farzana Chowdhury, 2024. "Knowledge investment and search for innovation: evidence from the UK firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1387-1410, August.
    10. Rouyre, Audrey & Fernandez, Anne-Sophie & Bruyaka, Olga, 2024. "Big problems require large collective actions: Managing multilateral coopetition in strategic innovation networks," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Inyoung Park & Jieon Lee & Jungwoo Nam & Yuri Jo & Daeho Lee, 2022. "Which networking strategy improves ICT startup companies' technical efficiency?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2434-2443, September.
    12. Jonathan Lautenschlager & Jan Stramm & Tobias Guggenberger & Nils Urbach, 2025. "Striking a balance: Designing a blockchain-based solution to navigate coopetition dynamics in supply chain management," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Xie, Zhenzhen & Zhao, Yuxuan & Li, Peter Ping & Wu, Rui, 2025. "The link between China's catchup process and the China-US technology decoupling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Xie, Qiuhao & Ma, Pei & Gao, Ying & Zhang, Shuibo, 2024. "Unpacking coopetition in international strategic alliances: Dimensions, contingencies, and structures," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    15. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    16. Arash Golnam & Paavo Ritala & Alain Wegmann, 2014. "Coopetition within and between value networks - a typology and a modelling framework," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 47-68.
    17. Mélanie Roux & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Prasanta Kumar Dey & Emilia Vann Yaroson & Vijay Pereira & Amelie Abadie, 2025. "Small and medium-sized enterprises as technology innovation intermediaries in sustainable business ecosystem: interplay between AI adoption, low carbon management and resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(2), pages 1537-1586, December.
    18. Orlando, Giuseppe, 2022. "Simulating heterogeneous corporate dynamics via the Rulkov map," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 32-42.
    19. Kristina Jespersen & Damiana Rigamonti & Morten Berg Jensen & Rune Bysted, 2018. "Analysis of SMEs partner proximity preferences for process innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 879-904, December.
    20. LOPES BENTO Cindy & HOTTENROTT Hanna, 2012. "Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-29, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:40-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.