IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v21y2022i2p365-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of People’s Self-Interests of the Arctic Zone of Russia in Their Pro-environmental Behavior Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina V. Karginova-Gubinova
  • Sergey V. Tishkov
  • Alexander D. Volkov

Abstract

As environmental behavior is still uncommon in developing countries and needs to be popularized, research on the factors for engaging in certain green practices is of high relevance. The aim of this study is to determine how self-interests of individuals of the Arctic zone of Russia influence the pro-environmental behaviors they choose to fulfill. The main hypothesis of the study is that worse-off individuals are more orientated towards the green practices that meet their economic self-interests; individuals with a higher standard of living are more concerned with reinforcement of self-esteem and acknowledgment from society. Methodologically, the study relied on Maslow’s needs theory and the Campbell paradigm. The dataset was gathered by surveying 1,102 residents of the Arctic zone of the Republic of Karelia on 14 green practices they may use. The data were analyzed by expert assessment, descriptive statistics methods, analysis of variance, correlation and cluster analyses. The study showed that the level of environmental concern of individuals does not depend on their standards of living, but as this involves financial costs; worse-off individuals adhere to fewer green practices and are more likely to choose the less costly ones (with no correlation between the income and the positive economic effect from the practice). At the same time, the green practices of environmentally passive and environmentally active individuals are less suited to their economic interests than the practices of individuals with a medium level of environmental activity. Scientifically, the value of this study is that it specifies and complements Maslow’s needs theory and the Campbell paradigm. The findings are of interest for authorities and non-governmental organizations in their efforts to alter the institutional arrangements for unpopular practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina V. Karginova-Gubinova & Sergey V. Tishkov & Alexander D. Volkov, 2022. "The Role of People’s Self-Interests of the Arctic Zone of Russia in Their Pro-environmental Behavior Choices," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 21(2), pages 365-389.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:365-389
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2022/06_Karginova-Gubinova_Tishkov_Volkov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yixing Lisa Gao & Anna S. Mattila, 2016. "The Impact of Option Popularity, Social Inclusion/Exclusion, and Self-affirmation on Consumers’ Propensity to Choose Green Hotels," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 575-585, July.
    2. Timothy Ka‐ying Wong & Po‐san Wan, 2011. "Perceptions and determinants of environmental concern: the case of Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 235-249, July.
    3. ., 2002. "Infrastructure Policy in Socialism and in the Market Economy," Chapters, in: Modernizing Infrastructure in Transformation Economies, chapter 2, pages 15-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Tae Kyung Yoon & SoEun Ahn, 2020. "Clustering Koreans’ Environmental Awareness and Attitudes into Seven Groups: Environmentalists, Dissatisfieds, Inactivators, Bystanders, Honeybees, Optimists, and Moderates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Balderjahn, Ingo & Peyer, Mathias & Seegebarth, Barbara & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Weber, Anja, 2018. "The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 83-93.
    6. Ramayah, T. & Lee, Jason Wai Chow & Mohamad, Osman, 2010. "Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1419-1427.
    7. Cui, Lixin & Wang, Yonggui & Chen, Weiming & Wen, Wen & Han, Myat Su, 2021. "Predicting determinants of consumers' purchase motivation for electric vehicles: An application of Maslow's hierarchy of needs model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Seeley, Eric, 1992. "Human needs and consumer economics: the implications of Maslow's theory of motivation for consumer expenditure patterns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 303-324.
    9. van Kempen, Luuk & Muradian, Roldan & Sandóval, César & Castañeda, Juan-Pablo, 2009. "Too poor to be green consumers? A field experiment on revealed preferences for firewood in rural Guatemala," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2160-2167, May.
    10. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Sylwia Mokrysz & Łukasz Wróblewski, 2019. "Segmentation of Coffee Consumers Using Sustainable Values: Cluster Analysis on the Polish Coffee Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Manuela Escobar-Sierra & Alejandra García-Cardona & Luz Dinora Vera Acevedo, 2021. "How moral outrage affects consumer’s perceived values of socially irresponsible companies," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1888668-188, January.
    12. Jizi Li & Yuping Zhou & Dengke Yu & Chunling Liu, 2020. "Consumers’ Purchase Intention of New Energy Vehicles: Do Product-Life-Cycle Policy Portfolios Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Michael Hagerty, 1999. "Testing Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life Across Time," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 249-271, March.
    14. Birgitta Gatersleben & Niamh Murtagh & Wokje Abrahamse, 2014. "Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 374-392, December.
    15. Hsiang Te Liu & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2020. "The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Green Smartphones: Moderating Effect of Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Niedermeier & Agnes Emberger‐Klein & Klaus Menrad, 2021. "Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast‐moving consumer goods in Germany?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1823-1838, May.
    2. Yuanhong Liao & Weihong Yang, 2022. "The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8566-8592, June.
    3. Binder, Martin & Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin & Guardiola, Jorge, 2020. "Does it have to be a sacrifice? Different notions of the good life, pro-environmental behavior and their heterogeneous impact on well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Tih, Siohong & Zainol, Zuraidah, 2012. "Minimizing Waste and Encouraging Green Practices," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 46(1), pages 157-164.
    5. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    6. Christos Ntais & Jean Suvatjis & Yioula Melanthiou, 2023. "Medical Cannabis: Modeling a Destigmatization Process for its Candidacy to Become a Pharmaceutical Brand," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 612-633.
    7. Artjoms Ivlevs, 2019. "Adverse Welfare Shocks and Pro‐Environmental Behavior: Evidence from the Global Economic Crisis," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(2), pages 293-311, June.
    8. Ibe Delvaux & Wendy Broeck, 2023. "Social Marketing and the Sustainable Development Goals: Scoping Review (2013–2021)," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 573-603, September.
    9. Lim, Weng Marc & O'Connor, Peter & Nair, Sumesh & Soleimani, Samaneh & Rasul, Tareq, 2023. "A foundational theory of ethical decision-making: The case of marketing professionals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Chuanlan Liu & Jeremy M. Bernardoni & Zhongjie Wang, 2023. "Examining Generation Z Consumer Online Fashion Resale Participation and Continuance Intention through the Lens of Consumer Perceived Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Ed Diener & Richard Lucas, 2000. "Explaining Differences in Societal Levels of Happiness: Relative Standards, Need Fulfillment, Culture, and Evaluation Theory," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 41-78, March.
    12. Mahmoud Sulaiman Sesay & Xiaoling Guo, 2022. "How does consumer moral identity influence green consumption through self-enhancement/self-verification? An empirical investigation in Sierra Leone," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 211-231.
    13. Hallstein, Eric & Villas-Boas, Sofia Berto, 2009. "Are Consumers Color Blind?: an empirical investigation of a traffic light advisory for sustainable seafood," CUDARE Working Papers 120535, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Nathaly Aya Pastrana & Rafael Obregón, 2023. "Harnessing the power of social marketing for sustainable development," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 661-692, September.
    15. Faccioli, Michela & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Glenk, Klaus & Martin-Ortega, Julia, 2020. "Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim & Tu, Gengyang & Whitmarsh, Lorraine & Whittle, Colin, 2022. "Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann & Ingo Balderjahn, 2021. "When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1151-1174, November.
    18. Ariyawardana, Anoma & Lim-Camacho, Lilly & Crimp, Steven & Wellington, Michael & Somogyi, Simon, 2018. "Consumer Response to Climate Adaptation Strategies in the Food Sector: An Australian Scenario," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 383-393.
    19. Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2020. "Key Factors Influencing Purchase or Rent Decisions in Smart Real Estate Investments: A System Dynamics Approach Using Online Forum Thread Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-36, May.
    20. Silvia Emili & Federica Galli, 2022. "Self-perceptions and perceptions of peers: their role in understanding expenditure behaviours," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4573-4597, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Arctic zone of Karelia; green practices; economic interests; environmental interests; pro-environmental actions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:365-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.