IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32468.html

Identifying The Set Of Ssd-Efficient Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • McCamley, Francis P.
  • Kliebenstein, James B.

Abstract

Target MOTAD and other direct utility-maximization models provide one way of computing SSD-efficient mixtures. These models are appropriate when the utility function is known and can also be used to identify part of the set of SSD-efficient mixtures even when the utility function is not known. However, they do not always identify all SSD-efficient mixtures. A grid method was proposed by Bawa, Lindenberg, and Rafsky. A third approach, which extends the work of Dybvig and Ross, is presented here. It is illustrated by applying it to data from Anderson, Dillon, and Hardaker.

Suggested Citation

  • McCamley, Francis P. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1987. "Identifying The Set Of Ssd-Efficient Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(01), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32468
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32468/files/12010086.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David K. Lambert & Bruce A. McCarl, 1985. "Risk Modeling Using Direct Solution of Nonlinear Approximations of the Utility Function," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 846-852.
    2. Bruce A. McCarl & Thomas O. Knight & James R. Wilson & James B. Hastie, 1987. "Stochastic Dominance over Potential Portfolios: Caution Regarding Covariance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(4), pages 804-812.
    3. repec:ags:agsaem:288652 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dybvig, Philip H & Ross, Stephen A, 1982. "Portfolio Efficient Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1525-1546, November.
    5. Hadar, Josef & Russell, William R., 1974. "Diversification of interdependent prospects," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 231-240, March.
    6. McCamley, F. P. & Kliebenstein, James, 1987. "Identifying the Set of Ssd Efficient Mixtures of Risky Alternatives," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10626, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Cochran, Mark J., 1986. "Stochastic Dominance: The State Of The Art In Agricultural Economics," Regional Research Projects > 1986: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 23-26, 1986, Tampa, Florida 271995, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McCamley, Francis, "undated". "Approximating A Gsd-Efficient Set Of Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives For Risk Averse Decision Makers," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270301, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McCamley, Francis, "undated". "Approximating A Gsd-Efficient Set Of Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives For Risk Averse Decision Makers," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270301, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Wetzstein, Michael E. & Szmedra, Philip I. & McClendon, Ronald W. & Edwards, David M., 1988. "Efficiency Criteria And Risk Aversion: An Empirical Evaluation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-8, July.
    3. McCamley, Francis, "undated". "Identifying A Csd Efficient Set Of Mixtures Of Risky Alternatives For Risk Preferring Decision Makers," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270125, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    5. Timothy J. Lowe & Paul V. Preckel, 2004. "Decision Technologies for Agribusiness Problems: A Brief Review of Selected Literature and a Call for Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 201-208.
    6. Post, G.T., 2003. "Asset prices and omitted moments; A stochastic dominance analysis of market efficiency," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-017-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Apland, Jeffrey & Hauer, Grant, 1993. "Discrete Stochastic Programming: Concepts, Examples And A Review Of Empirical Applications," Staff Papers 13793, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. David J. Pannell, 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 361-383, August.
    9. Acs, Szvetlana & Berentsen, Paul B.M. & Huirne, Ruud & van Asseldonk, Marcel, 2009. "Effect of yield and price risk on conversion from conventional to organic farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-19.
    10. Araujo, Aloisio & Chateauneuf, Alain & Faro, José Heleno, 2018. "Financial market structures revealed by pricing rules: Efficient complete markets are prevalent," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 257-288.
    11. Perez-Mesa, Juan Carlos & Galdeano-Gomez, Emilio & Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A., . "Management System for Harvest Scheduling: The Case of Horticultural Production in Southeast Spain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20.
    12. Dana, R. A., 2004. "Market behavior when preferences are generated by second-order stochastic dominance," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 619-639, September.
    13. Rose‐Anne Dana, 2005. "A Representation Result For Concave Schur Concave Functions," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 613-634, October.
    14. Musshoff, Oliver & Hirschauer, Norbert, "undated". "Sophisticated Program Planning Approaches Generate Large Benefits in High Risk Crop Farming," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 36865, Agricultural Economics Society.
    15. Eihab Fathelrahman & Aydin Basarir & Mohamed Gheblawi & Sherin Sherif & James Ascough, 2014. "Economic Risk and Efficiency Assessment of Fisheries in Abu-Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE): A Stochastic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Goh, Siew & Shih, Chao-Chyuan & Cochran, Mark J. & Raskin, Rob, 1989. "A Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program For The Ibm Pc," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-8, December.
    17. Arnade, Carlos & Lee, David, 1990. "Risk Aversion Through Nontraditional Export Promotion Programs in Central America," Staff Reports 278362, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Torkamani, Javad, 2005. "Using a whole-farm modelling approach to assess prospective technologies under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 138-154, August.
    19. G. R. Soltani & M. Bakhshoodeh & M. Zibaei, 2009. "Optimization of Agricultural Water Use and Trade Patterns: The Case of Iran," Working Papers 508, Economic Research Forum, revised Dec 2009.
    20. Post, Thierry, 2005. "A Stochastic Dominance Approach to Spanning. With an Application to the January Effect/Una aproximación mediante la metodología del dominio estocástico al fenómeno del SPANNING. Una aplicación al efec," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 23, pages 7-25, Abril.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.