IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polgne/359262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulacja lichwy: uzasadnienie, konsekwencje i wybrane wnioski z polskich doświadczeń

Author

Listed:
  • Kowalski, Ryszard
  • Wałęga, Grzegorz

Abstract

In this paper we analyse a recent debate on justification of usury regulations and their implications. To investigate the impact of liberal, competition-enhancing policy on usurious practices, we present a case study of the Polish payday loan market after 2008. We also examine the efficacy of usury regulations in Poland. Our study finds that consumer welfare, social welfare, and the risk of exploitation of borrowers are the main arguments for introducing interest caps. We demonstrate that, in pursuit of greater profits, loan companies use additional non-interest fees and commissions as well as bundling, and thereby reduce the transparency of loan agreements. We show that rising competition on the payday loan market is not sufficient to reduce the cost of loans, especially when the efficacy of regulatory control is deficient and unsatisfactory. Therefore, the efficacy of the judicial system can be seen as essential to combat usurious lending.

Suggested Citation

  • Kowalski, Ryszard & Wałęga, Grzegorz, 2022. "Regulacja lichwy: uzasadnienie, konsekwencje i wybrane wnioski z polskich doświadczeń," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2022(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:359262
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.359262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/359262/files/Wa%C5%82%C4%99ga.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.359262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashmi Kiran Ekka & Mark D. Wenner & Anita Campion, 2010. "Interest Rates and Implications for Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 80278, Inter-American Development Bank.
    2. Morse, Adair, 2011. "Payday lenders: Heroes or villains?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 28-44, October.
    3. Andrzej Cwynar & Wiktor Cwynar & Kamil Wais, 2019. "Debt Literacy and Debt Literacy Self‐Assessment: The Case of Poland," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 24-57, March.
    4. Robert DeYoung & Ronnie J. Phillips, 2013. "Interest rate caps and implicit collusion: the case of payday lending," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 121-158.
    5. Brian T. Melzer, 2011. "The Real Costs of Credit Access: Evidence from the Payday Lending Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(1), pages 517-555.
    6. Bhutta, Neil, 2014. "Payday loans and consumer financial health," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 230-242.
    7. Lisa Crosato & Lucia Dalla Pellegrina, 2019. "Safe credit to the poor: The role of anti‐usury policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(3), pages 423-449, May.
    8. Alyssa Labat & Walter Block, 2012. "Money Does Not Grow on Trees: An Argument for Usury," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 383-387, March.
    9. Robert Mayer, 2013. "When and Why Usury Should be Prohibited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 513-527, September.
    10. Igor Livshits & James MacGee & Michèle Tertilt, 2010. "Accounting for the Rise in Consumer Bankruptcies," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 165-193, April.
    11. Stephan Meier & Charles Sprenger, 2010. "Present-Biased Preferences and Credit Card Borrowing," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 193-210, January.
    12. Maimbo, Samuel Munzele & Henriquez Gallegos, Claudia Alejandra, 2014. "Interest rate caps around the world: still popular, but a blunt instrument," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7070, The World Bank.
    13. Fulford, Scott L., 2015. "How important is variability in consumer credit limits?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 42-63.
    14. Jonathan Zinman, 2014. "Consumer Credit: Too Much or Too Little (or Just Right)?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(S2), pages 209-237.
    15. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Podder, Jyotirmoy & Shahriar, Abu Zafar M., 2017. "Performance of Microfinance Institutions: Does Government Ideology Matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-15.
    16. Jeppe Druedahl & Casper Nordal Jørgensen, 2018. "Precautionary borrowing and the credit card debt puzzle," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(2), pages 785-823, July.
    17. repec:bla:ecpoli:v:24:y:2009:i::p:107-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Emre Alper & Benedict Clements & Niko Hobdari & Rafel Moya Porcel, 2020. "Do interest rate controls work? Evidence from Kenya," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 910-926, August.
    19. repec:oup:ecpoli:v:24:y:2009:i::p:107-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    21. Tuomas Takalo, 2019. "Regulation of short-term consumer credits," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 348-354, December.
    22. Constant Mews & Ibrahim Abraham, 2007. "Usury and Just Compensation: Religious and Financial Ethics in Historical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, April.
    23. Burcu Duygan-Bump & Charles Grant, 2009. "Household debt repayment behaviour: what role do institutions play? [‘Welfare implications of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 24(57), pages 108-140.
    24. Li, Mingliang & Mumford, Kevin J. & Tobias, Justin L., 2012. "A Bayesian analysis of payday loans and their regulation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 205-216.
    25. John Gathergood & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Stefan Hunt, 2019. "How Do Payday Loans Affect Borrowers? Evidence from the U.K. Market," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 496-523.
    26. Joseph Persky, 2007. "Retrospectives: From Usury to Interest," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 227-236, Winter.
    27. Dyna Heng, 2015. "Impact of the New Financial Services Law in Bolivia on Financial Stability and Inclusion," IMF Working Papers 2015/267, International Monetary Fund.
    28. I. Ramsay & T. Williams, 2020. "Peering Forward, 10 Years After: International Policy and Consumer Credit Regulation," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 209-226, March.
    29. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 393-410, June.
    30. Andrzej Cwynar & Wiktor Cwynar & Kamil Wais & Radoslaw Parda, 2017. "Personal Loan Companies in Poland: Does Empirical Evidence Justify Regulatory Transition?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 377-396.
    31. Douglas Gale & Martin Hellwig, 1985. "Incentive-Compatible Debt Contracts: The One-Period Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 52(4), pages 647-663.
    32. Ekka, Rashmi Kiran & Wenner, Mark D. & Campion, Anita, 2010. "Interest Rates and Implications for Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4298, Inter-American Development Bank.
    33. K. Majamaa & A.-R. Lehtinen & K. Rantala, 2019. "Debt Judgments as a Reflection of Consumption-Related Debt Problems," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 223-244, June.
    34. Aldo Barba & Massimo Pivetti, 2009. "Rising household debt: Its causes and macroeconomic implications--a long-period analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(1), pages 113-137, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryszard Kowalski & Grzegorz Wałęga, 2022. "Regulation of Usury: Justification, Consequences, and Some Lessons from Polish Experience," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 57-73.
    2. Francisco Gomes & Michael Haliassos & Tarun Ramadorai, 2021. "Household Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 919-1000, September.
    3. Dasgupta, Kabir & Mason, Brenden J., 2020. "The effect of interest rate caps on bankruptcy: Synthetic control evidence from recent payday lending bans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Robert Mayer, 2013. "When and Why Usury Should be Prohibited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 513-527, September.
    5. Doris Neuberger & Udo Reifner, 2020. "Systemic Usury and the European Consumer Credit Directive," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 89(1), pages 115-132.
    6. J. Brandon Bolen & Gregory Elliehausen & Thomas W. Miller, 2020. "Do Consumers Need More Protection From Small‐Dollar Lenders? Historical Evidence And A Roadmap For Future Research," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(4), pages 1577-1613, October.
    7. Jonathan Zinman, 2014. "Consumer Credit: Too Much or Too Little (or Just Right)?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(S2), pages 209-237.
    8. Mary Zaki, 2016. "Access to Short-term Credit and Consumption Smoothing within the Paycycle," Working Papers 2016.07, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Leong, Kaiwen & Li, Huailu & Pavanini, Nicola & Walsh, Christoph, 2024. "The effects of policy interventions to limit illegal money lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Marieke Bos & Chloé Le Coq & Peter van Santen, 2022. "Scarcity and consumers’ credit choices," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 105-139, February.
    11. Christa Gibbs & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Donghoon Lee & Scott Nelson & Wilbert van der Klaauw & Jialan Wang, 2025. "Consumer Credit Reporting Data," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 598-636, June.
    12. Cuffe, Harold E. & Gibbs, Christopher G., 2017. "The effect of payday lending restrictions on liquor sales," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 132-145.
    13. Jae Min Lee & Narang Park & Wookjae Heo, 2019. "Importance of Subjective Financial Knowledge and Perceived Credit Score in Payday Loan Use," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, September.
    14. P. I. Omede, 2020. "A Tale of Two Markets: How Lower-end Borrowers Are Punished for Bank Regulatory Failures in Nigeria," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 519-542, September.
    15. Fu, Shun & Li, Emma & Liao, Li & Wang, Zhengwei & Xiang, Hongyu, 2025. "Unveiling the villain: Credit supply and the debt trap," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. K. Majamaa & A.-R. Lehtinen, 2022. "An Analysis of Finnish Debtors Who Defaulted in 2014–2016 Because of Unsecured Credit Products," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 595-617, December.
    17. Chunchun Chen & Chengchun Li & Guoying Ren, 2022. "The effect of present‐biased preferences on revolving debts: Evidence from urban households in China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 2653-2668, July.
    18. Zaki, Mary, 2016. "Access to Short-term Credit and Consumption Smoothing within the Paycycle," ET: Economic Theory 232213, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    19. Timothy E. Dore & Traci L. Mach, 2019. "Marketplace Lending and Consumer Credit Outcomes : Evidence from Prosper," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-022, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    20. Christine L. Dobridge, 2018. "High‐Cost Credit and Consumption Smoothing," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 50(2-3), pages 407-433, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polgne:359262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irsghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.