IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/354493.html

De l'importance du maintien de la préférence communautaire pour l'agriculture française

Author

Listed:
  • Gohin, Alexandre
  • Guyomard, Hervé
  • Le Mouël, Chantal

Abstract

Since a few years, computable general equilibrium models have been intensively used to analyse environmental policies. These models rely on a walrasian framework and allow for an explicit description of economy/environment interactions. In the first section, we describe briefly the main features of the computable general equilibrium models. Then in the second section we focuse on various ways to model environmental feedbacks on households or firms behaviours. We illustrate the notions of static and dynamic non-separability (or static and dynamic feedbacks) by taking examples from the recent literature. In the third section we finally present the scope of the calculable general equilibrium model and their role in the rise of the so-called 'double dividend' issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohin, Alexandre & Guyomard, Hervé & Le Mouël, Chantal, 1999. "De l'importance du maintien de la préférence communautaire pour l'agriculture française," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 251.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354493
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/354493/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1999_num_251_1_5083.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.354493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gohin, Alexandre & Guyomard, Hervé & Le Mouël, Chantal, 1998. "Éléments de définition d'une politique agricole commune pour le XXIe siècle," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 244.
    2. Harrison, Glenn W. & Rutherford, Thomas F. & Wooton, Ian, 1995. "Liberalizing agriculture in the European union," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 223-255, June.
    3. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "Economic Implications Of Agricultural Policy Reforms In Industrial Market Economies," Staff Reports 278843, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1988. "Modelling the Removal of Production Incentive Distortions in the US Agricultural Sector," 1988 Conference, August 24-31, 1988, Buenos Aires, Argentina 183151, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1984. "Applied General-Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1007-1051, September.
    6. Morris Morkre & David Tarr, 2014. "Reforming Hungarian Agricultural Trade Policy: A Quantitative Evaluation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: APPLIED TRADE POLICY MODELING IN 16 COUNTRIES Insights and Impacts from World Bank CGE Based Projects, chapter 3, pages 49-74, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandre Gohin & Herve Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 2006. "Tariff protection elimination and Common Agricultural Policy reform: implications of changes in methods of import demand modelling," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(13), pages 1527-1539.
    2. Hanson, Kenneth A. & Robinson, Sherman, 1989. "Data, Linkages, And Models: U.S. National Income And Product Accounts In The Framework Of A Social Accounting Matrix," Staff Reports 278155, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kilkenny, Maureen & Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Economywide Implications of Agricultural Liberalization in the United States," CUDARE Working Papers 198562, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Robinson, Sherman & Kilkenny, Maureen & Hanson, Kenneth, 1990. "The USDA/ERS Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278341, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    6. Y. Qiang, 1999. "CGE Modelling and Australian Economics," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 99-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    7. Jean-François Gautier, 2000. "Réformes douanières au Bénin et libéralisation commerciale du Nigeria : Un modèle EGC avec concurrence imparfaite appliquée au commerce trans-frontalier," Working Papers DT/2000/03, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    8. Döll, Sebastian, 2009. "Climate change impacts in computable general equilibrium models: An overview," HWWI Research Papers 1-26, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    9. David Hoaas, 2000. "Mining improbable postulates and the theory of diverting toys(Advances in General Equilibrium Theory) Donald A. Walker Edward Elgar, 1997, 165 pp," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 28(1), pages 104-113, March.
    10. Donders, Jan & Graafland, Johan, 1998. "CPB models and employment policy in the Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 341-356, July.
    11. Stefan Boeters & Michael Feil, 2009. "Heterogeneous Labour Markets in a Microsimulation–AGE Model: Application to Welfare Reform in Germany," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 305-335, May.
    12. Karim, Mohamed & Bouzahzah, Mohamed, 2012. "Women’s changing participation in the Labor Force. A CGE Model applied to the Moroccan economy," MPRA Paper 45455, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Glenn W. Harrison & Thomas F. Rutherford & David G. Tarr, 2014. "Economic implications for Turkey of a Customs Union with the European Union," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: APPLIED TRADE POLICY MODELING IN 16 COUNTRIES Insights and Impacts from World Bank CGE Based Projects, chapter 16, pages 395-404, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    14. Hinojosa-Ojeda, Raul A. & Robinson, Sherman & Lewis, Jeffrey D., 1995. "Regional integration options for Central America and the Caribbean after NAFTA," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 121-148.
    15. Johnson, S.R., 1986. "Doable General Equilibrium Models: Comments on Three Papers Presented to the AAEA Summer Meetings 1986," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278433, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Andreas Mense & Andreas Mense, DIW Berlin/FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg & Konstanin Kholodilin, Ph.D, DIW Berlin, 2011. "A 71 Sector CGE Model for Germany," EcoMod2011 2941, EcoMod.
    17. Karl D. Meilke & Don McClatchy & Harry de Gorter, 1996. "Challenges in quantitative economic analysis in support of multilateral trade negotiations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(3), pages 185-200, August.
    18. Lawrence H. Summers, 1985. "Taxation and the Size and Composition of the Capital Stock: An Asset Price Approach," NBER Working Papers 1709, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Zylicz, Tomasz, 2010. "Goals and Principles of Environmental Policy," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 3(4), pages 299-334, May.
    20. Céline DE QUATREBARBES & Luc SAVARD & Dorothée BOCCANFUSO, 2010. "La fin des exonérations de TVA est-elle favorable aux pauvres ? Le cas du Niger," Working Papers 201034, CERDI.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.