IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/352009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les modèles de simulation technico-economiques comme méthode d'analyse des différentes politiques agricoles

Author

Listed:
  • Lefer, Henri-Bertrand
  • Blaskovic, Hana

Abstract

Facing new policy resulting from CAP reform, common management analysises, based on a complete entreprise development pattern rigidity, are mainly useless. Traditional economical tools are exposed to some limits. So, we purpose here, a methodology focusing onto linear programming associated to the plant growth simulation program Epic (Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator). Aim is to simulate productor behaviour : technical and economical adaptability facing various agricultural policy orientations. A first simulation has been drawn in cereal production farm in Beauce. Our concerns are to compare Mac Sharry reform effects with latest CAP system.

Suggested Citation

  • Lefer, Henri-Bertrand & Blaskovic, Hana, 1994. "Les modèles de simulation technico-economiques comme méthode d'analyse des différentes politiques agricoles," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 224.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:352009
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.352009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/352009/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1994_num_224_1_4692.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.352009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cabelguenne, M. & Jones, C. A. & Marty, J. R. & Dyke, P. T. & Williams, J. R., 1990. "Calibration and validation of EPIC for crop rotations in southern France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 153-171.
    2. Carmen Vicien, 1991. "Les modèles de simulation comme fonctions de production," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 204(1), pages 46-50.
    3. Yair Mundlak & René Hellinghausen, 1982. "The Intercountry Agricultural Production Function: Another View," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(4), pages 664-672.
    4. Richard E. Just & Rulon D. Pope, 1979. "Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(2), pages 276-284.
    5. Rulon D. Pope, 1984. "Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(2), pages 223-224.
    6. Putman, John W. & Dyke, Paul T., 1987. "The Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator as Formulated for the Resource Conservation Act Appraisal," Staff Reports 277924, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    8. Gordon A. King, 1984. "Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(2), pages 221-222.
    9. Levhari, David & Sheshinski, Eytan, 1970. "A Microeconomic Production Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 559-573, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henri-Bertrand Lefer & Hana Blaskovic, 1994. "Les modèles de simulation technico-economiques comme méthode d'analyse des différentes politiques agricoles," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 224(1), pages 45-51.
    2. Carmen Vicien, 1991. "Les modèles de simulation comme fonctions de production," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 204(1), pages 46-50.
    3. Vicien, Carmen, 1991. "Les modèles de simulation comme fonctions de production," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 204.
    4. Trueblood, Michael A., 1994. "An Annotated Bibliography Of Selected Productivity Literature," Staff Papers 13580, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Antti Saastamoinen, 2015. "Heteroscedasticity Or Production Risk? A Synthetic View," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 459-478, July.
    6. Kerstin Pull & Birgit Pferdmenges & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2017. "Do Research Training Groups Operate at Optimal Size?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(2), pages 129-145, May.
    7. Ghiyasi, Mojtaba & Cook, Wade D., 2021. "Modelling the semi-additive production technology in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Arzum Buyukkeklik & Harun Dumlu & Samet Evci, 2016. "Measuring the Efficiency of Turkish SMEs: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 190-190, June.
    9. Mohammad Reza TAVAKOLI BAGHDADABAD & Afsaneh NOORI HOUSHYAR, 2014. "Productivity and Efficiency Evaluation of US Mutual Funds," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 64(2), pages 120-143, March.
    10. Paolo Mazzocchi & Claudio Quintano & Antonella Rocca, 2024. "Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5621-5654, December.
    11. Ajayi, Victor & Anaya, Karim & Pollitt, Michael, 2022. "Incentive regulation, productivity growth and environmental effects: the case of electricity networks in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. François Seck FALL & Harouna WASSONGMA & Waly Clément FAYE, 2019. "Total Factor Productivity Change of Senegalese Microfinance Institutions: A Malmquist Productivity Index Approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 1786-1797.
    13. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Nurhan Davutyan & Canan Yildirim, 2013. "Competitiveness in Turkish Banking: 2002-2011," Working Papers 774, Economic Research Forum, revised Sep 2013.
    15. Khanjarpanah, Hossein & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2019. "Sustainable wind plant location optimization using fuzzy cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1004-1018.
    16. Premachandra, I.M. & Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 412-424, March.
    17. repec:zbw:rwirep:0060 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sweksha Srivastava & Abha Aggarwal, 2025. "The Efficiency Analysis and Ranking Employing Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Incorporating Cumulative Prospect Theory," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-34, September.
    19. Seufert, Juergen Heinz & Arjomandi, Amir & Dakpo, K. Hervé, 2017. "Evaluating airline operational performance: A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 52-68.
    20. Chun-Chu Liu, 2008. "Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(13), pages 1737-1743.
    21. Agrell, Per J. & Teusch, Jonas, 2020. "Predictability and strategic behavior under frontier regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:352009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.