IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364314.html

Digital innovation in public policies: determinants of the acceptability of e-fiscalisation in agribusiness

Author

Listed:
  • Cani, Denisa
  • Kolaj, Rezear
  • Dimitrova, Svetla

Abstract

Purpose. The study identifies factors influencing the acceptance of e-fiscalisation in Albania’s agribusiness, providing information for policymakers and stakeholders to improve the implementation of digital taxation and increase the efficiency of the system. Methodology / approach. The methodology includes a comprehensive literature review and an empirical analysis based on surveys conducted among agribusiness operators in Albania. The survey measures the impact of institutional, individual, logistical, and behavioural factors on e-fiscalisation acceptance. Data collected are analysed using statistical methods, including regression analysis, to test the formulated hypotheses and derive meaningful conclusions about e-fiscalisation acceptance. Results. Innovations and new technologies have significantly transformed Albania’s tax system, particularly through the rapid implementation of e-fiscalisation. The process has improved the performance of tax administration and institutions, enhanced the agribusiness climate, and strengthened trust within the financial landscape. E-fiscalisation has contributed to greater transparency, accountability, and governance, ultimately fostering a more equitable taxation process. The holistic quantitative-qualitative investigation fills the research gap by highlighting innovations that restore trust and increase the potential for fairer tax practices. The results reveal significant relationships between tax administration performance, operators’ skills, IT service quality, logistical infrastructure, and trust with the acceptance of e-fiscalisation among agribusiness operators, and this is essential for the attitude towards the reform and possible beliefs about similar innovations in the future. Originality / scientific novelty. The originality of the study lies in its specific focus on the agribusiness in Albania, an area that has not been previously researched in the context of e-fiscalisation acceptance. By integrating institutional, individual, technical, and behavioural factors, the research comprehensively explains the determinants of e-fiscalisation acceptance, contributing theoretically and practically with findings and new knowledge to the existing literature and practices in digitisation reforms in public regulatory policies and adjustments in the agribusiness ecosystem. Practical value / implications. The findings provide actionable insights into enhancing e-fiscalisation adoption through improved tax administration, operator skills, IT service quality, logistical infrastructure, and trust. These insights can guide the development of targeted strategies and policies to facilitate the broader and more effective implementation of e-fiscalisation in the agribusiness, ultimately improving efficiency and transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Cani, Denisa & Kolaj, Rezear & Dimitrova, Svetla, . "Digital innovation in public policies: determinants of the acceptability of e-fiscalisation in agribusiness," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364314
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364314/files/9_Cani_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swenson, Charles W., 1988. "Taxpayer behavior in response to taxation: An experimental analysis," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28.
    2. Raju Huidrom & M. Ayhan Kose & Franziska L. Ohnsorge, 2018. "Challenges of Fiscal Policy in Emerging and Developing Economies," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 1927-1945, July.
    3. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Woerter, Martin, 2019. "Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    4. Thomas F Stafford & Aykut Hamit Turan, 2011. "Online tax payment systems as an emergent aspect of governmental transformation," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 343-357, May.
    5. Asep Heri Hermanto & Nila Armelia Windasari & Mustika Sufiati Purwanegara, 2022. "Taxpayers’ adoption of online tax return reporting: extended meta-UTAUT model perspective," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2110724-211, December.
    6. Sonia B. Dhaliwal & Dua Sohail & Keeley Hafer & Sehar Azam & Bryn Hafer, 2023. "Digitalization Of Tax Administration: A Review Of The Organization For Economic Co-Operation And Development (Oecd) Guidelines," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 55-81.
    7. Olena Lukianykhina & Svitlana Suprunenko & Alla Slavkova & Oleh Skorba & Kostiantyn Zavrazhnyi, 2024. "Digital Innovations in the Fiscal Policy of Ukraine: Promoting Sustainable Economic Development," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 77-86, July.
    8. Ha Thi Hai Do & Yen Thi Hai Mac & Hoa Thi Van Tran & Thuy Thi Le Nguyen, 2022. "The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(1), pages 35-64.
    9. Mohammed Saleh Al-Maghrebi & Noor Sharoja Sapiei & Mazni Abdullah, 2022. "Power, Trust and Transparency as Determinant Factors of Tax Compliance: A Systematic Review," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 8(3), pages 312-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zofia Grodek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Aneta Piechaczek & Luis Ochoa Siguencia, 2021. "Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 348-361.
    2. Ang, James & Yan, Zhenli & Xiao, Tusheng & Yuan, Chun & Wang, Jingfang, 2024. "Impact of Fintech on labor allocation efficiency in firms: Empirical evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Sielaff, Christian, 2011. "Steuerkomplexität und Arbeitsangebot: Eine experimentelle Analyse," Discussion Papers 2011/13, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    4. Janez Kren & Martina Lawless, 2024. "Firm-Level Attitudes and Actions to the "Twin Transition" Challenges of Digitalisation and Climate Change," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 55(1), pages 9-39.
    5. Mauro Caselli & Andrea Fracasso & Arianna Marcolin & Sergio Scicchitano, 2023. "The reassuring effect of firms' technological innovations on workers' job insecurity," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(4), pages 754-778, October.
    6. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Krämer, Jan & Palan, Nicole, 2024. "Socioeconomic benefits of high-speed broadband availability and service adoption: A survey," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    7. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Lanahan, Lauren & Joshi, Amol M. & Johnson, Evan, 2021. "Do public R&D subsidies produce jobs? Evidence from the SBIR/STTR program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    9. Laura Abrardi & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 969-991, September.
    10. Fischer, Leonie & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Spengel, Christoph & Steinbrenner, Daniela, 2021. "Tax policies in a transition to a knowledge-based economy: The effective tax burden of companies and highly skilled labour," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-096, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Yang, Yang & Xiao, Zheng, 2024. "Examining the interaction effect of digitalization and highly educated employees on ambidextrous innovation in Chinese publicly listed SMEs: A knowledge-based view," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Mariia Vasiakina & Christian Dudel, 2024. "From efficiency to illness: do highly automatable jobs take a toll on health in Germany?," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2024-041, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    13. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:348-361 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lévy-Garboua, Louis & Masclet, David & Montmarquette, Claude, 2009. "A behavioral Laffer curve: Emergence of a social norm of fairness in a real effort experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 147-161, April.
    15. Hang Thu Nguyen-Phung & Miki Kohara & Secil Er, 2024. "The impact of ICT development on female employment and household’s well-being in Vietnam," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 951-978, December.
    16. Claude Montmarquette & David Masclet, 2008. "Approche expérimentale de l'incidence de la fiscalité sur l'offre de travail : une étude comparative des systèmes d'imposition," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 182(1), pages 47-59.
    17. Fabio Montobbio & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito & Marco Vivarelli, 2024. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations: Lessons learned and challenges ahead," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1622-1655, December.
    18. Cirillo, Valeria & Fanti, Lucrezia & Mina, Andrea & Ricci, Andrea, 2023. "The adoption of digital technologies: Investment, skills, work organisation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 89-105.
    19. Schröder, Melanie & Schmitt, Norma & Heynemann, Britta & Brünn, Claudia, 2013. "Income Taxation and Labor Supply: An Experiment on Couple's Work Effort," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79735, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Fierro, Luca Eduardo & Caiani, Alessandro & Russo, Alberto, 2022. "Automation, Job Polarisation, and Structural Change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 499-535.
    21. Ranka Popovac & Dragan Vukmirović & Tijana Čomić & Zoran G. Pavlović, 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of Remote Work on Employee Health and Sustainable Lifestyles in the IT Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.