IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business model development for installation of rubber floor mats to support productivity in dairy farming

Author

Listed:
  • Chanthes, Suteera
  • Sawangloke, Weerasak
  • Luangsakdapich, Rujira
  • Pattiya, Adisak
  • Srithep, Yottha

Abstract

Purpose. Ribbed smoked sheet (RSS) rubber gradually loses its quality as it is stored after production. Rubber floor mats are recommended as a marketable upstream production in the Thailand rubber industry to help add economic value to low-graded RSS. However, limited attention in research has been paid to business development, particularly on practical models focusing on the demand perspectives. This study helped fill the knowledge gap by analysing factors influencing labour production in dairy farming and proposing a business model based on productivity analysis. The aim of the project was to create a practical business model for cattle rubber floor mats made of low-graded RSS rubber used for nourishing and housing management to promote labour productivity in dairy farming. Methodology / approach. The study used mixed-methods research. A theoretical framework was developed concerning rubber floor mats used in dairy farming, which helped improve the nourishing and housing management of dairy cattle and promote labour productivity. This research adopted Osterwalder’s business model canvas to examine the demand and supply elements of dairy cattle floor mats made of low-graded rubber. It also used the knowledge-based entrepreneurship concept to scrutinise knowledge-based business development. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data required for multiple regression analysis of labour productivity using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method. It also used semi-structured interviews to scrutinise the subjective experiences of farmers. A focus group discussion was conducted to investigate academics and rubber promotional authorities concerning potential technology and the possibility of transfer of production technology to promote knowledge-based business development. Results. The empirical evidence presented in this paper confirmed that rubber floor mats could help enhance cattle nourishment, dairy housing management and labour productivity. Regional knowledge transfer network was revealed as a driver of knowledge-based development for assisting local upstream rubber farmers in pursuing eco-innovation in rubber production, aligning with the national initiatives of Industry 4.0 and Bio-Circular-Green economy (BCG) concepts. Originality / scientific novelty. The originality of this paper is that it presents the results of an empirical study using mixed methods for the first time aiming at clarifying practical elements of the supply and demand sides’ components of the Osterwalder’s Business Model Canvas for developing a business model delivered as a knowledge-based business model for the production of dairy cattle floor mats made of low-graded RSS rubber to help guide practical downstream rubber business development. The qualitative results, together with the quantitative analysis of labour productivity, are based on the perceptions of local farmers in Thailand regarding the use of rubber floor mats on the farm; previous studies scientifically prove its positive relation to an increase in dairy cattle nourishing, hence the daily productivity. Practical value / implications. The novel business model canvas could promote the practical cattle floor mats business development. University engagement and public support were included as the critical drivers in this knowledge-based business model. The model implementation could help encourage rubber farmers and smallholders in upstream rubber production to move towards downstream business development and become knowledge-based entrepreneurs in value-added rubber floor mats production. It could also guide the agricultural policymakers to benchmark and evaluate their policy targeting innovative knowledge-based business development for rubber extension.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanthes, Suteera & Sawangloke, Weerasak & Luangsakdapich, Rujira & Pattiya, Adisak & Srithep, Yottha, 2024. "Business model development for installation of rubber floor mats to support productivity in dairy farming," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355968
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355968/files/9_Chanthes_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Engelen & Clara von Gagern & Monika Engelen, 2023. "Company-related Opportunity Recognition Tools," Springer Books, in: Opportunity Recognition, chapter 2, pages 21-84, Springer.
    2. Kucher, Lesia & Kucher, Anatolii & Morozova, Hanna & Pashchenko, Yulia, 2022. "Development of circular agricultural economy: potential sources of financing innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
    3. Sagit Barel-Shaked, 2023. "Network-based business model in the agri-food sector: A case study of Green Fingers," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 162-170.
    4. Pornthep Weerathamrongsak & Winai Wongsurawat, 2013. "The rubber industry of Thailand: a review of past achievements and future prospects," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 49-63, May.
    5. Rida Akzar & Wendy Umberger & Alexandra Peralta, 2023. "Understanding heterogeneity in technology adoption among Indonesian smallholder dairy farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 347-370, March.
    6. Roger Schroeder & Andrew Van de Ven & Gary Scudder & Douglas Polley, 1986. "Managing innovation and change processes: Findings from the Minnesota innovation research program," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 501-523.
    7. Mohammadreza Salehi & Hadi Shirouyehzad & Reza Dabestani, 2013. "Labour productivity measurement through classification and standardisation of products," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 57-72.
    8. Pornthep Weerathamrongsak & Winai Wongsurawat, 2013. "The rubber industry of Thailand: a review of past achievements and future prospects," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 49-63, May.
    9. Suteera Chanthes, 2022. "University Outreach in the Triple Helix Model of Collaboration for Entrepreneurial Development," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 178192-1781, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selvaggi, R. & Pappalardo, G. & Zarbà, C. & Lusk, J.L., 2024. "Driving factors behind precision livestock farming tools adoption: The case of the pedometer on dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Kucher, Lesia & Hełdak, Maria & Orochovska, Lyudmila, 2023. "Assessment of the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(01), March.
    3. Antonio Adrián Arciénaga Morales & Janni Nielsen & Hernán Alberto Bacarini & Silvia Irene Martinelli & Sergio Takeo Kofuji & Juan Francisco García Díaz, 2018. "Technology and Innovation Management in Higher Education—Cases from Latin America and Europe," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-34, April.
    4. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 1998. "Organizational innovation : An overview of topics, models and research directions," Other publications TiSEM 03119425-3fea-4334-ad00-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Serhii Halko & Oleksandr Vershkov & Jakub Horák & Oleksandr Lezhenkin & Larysa Boltianska & Anatolii Kucher & Olena Suprun & Oleksandr Miroshnyk & Vitalii Nitsenko, 2023. "Efficiency of Combed Straw Harvesting Technology Involving Straw Decomposition in the Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Kyunga Na & Kwangsoo Shin, 2019. "The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Carla Martínez-Climent & María Rodríguez-García & Juying Zeng, 2019. "Ambidextrous Leadership, Social Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Ortt, J. Roland & Kamp, Linda M., 2022. "A technological innovation system framework to formulate niche introduction strategies for companies prior to large-scale diffusion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Bitsch, Vera, 2001. "Qualitative Research In Agricultural Economics: Paradigms, Purposes, And Evaluation Criteria," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20718, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Jurczyk-Bunkowska Magdalena, 2013. "Innovation Process Planning Model in the Bpmn Standard," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 25-38, December.
    11. Drebot, Oksana & Palianychko, Nina & Vysochanska, Mariya & Sakharnatska, Liudmyla & Gadzalo, Andriy, 2023. "Influence of energy efficiency of forestry enterprises on forestry land use indicators," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    12. Abhinav Kumar Singh & Pankaj Kumar & Rawshan Ali & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma & Kuldeep Singh Kushwaha & Kanhu Charan Panda & Atish Sagar & Ehsan Mirzania & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Alban Ku, 2022. "An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, July.
    13. Iryna Perevozova & Oksana Malynka & Vitalii Nitsenko & Halyna Kryshtal & Viktoriia Kostiuk & Vitaliia Mishchenko, 2023. "Analysis of Trends in Mortgage Lending in the Agricultural Sector of Ukraine," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.