IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/342216.html

Implication of Technology on Economic Progress of Farmers: A Case of India

Author

Listed:
  • Pabalkar, Vanishree
  • Moray, Rashmy

Abstract

This paper stresses the implication that technology has an important role in the economic progress of farmers. Analysis through the structural equation modelling reveals that technology has a high impact on a significant portion of the rural areas. With 150 respondents from the Osmanabad district of the state of Maharashtra this study focusses on two major reasons for adoption of agro technology. The initial schedule contained 116 items on various dimensions of self-motivation, external influences, social development, economic development, economic progress, health, and behavioral aspects. 90 items were retained. Since it is a multivariable study, confirmatory factor analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) are used in this study for data analysis in addition to parametric statistical tools. SPSS (20.0) and AMOS has been used for the same. It has been found that there is a correlation between technology and economic progress of farmers and that health consciousness has increased and the behavioral pattern has changed among farmers in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Pabalkar, Vanishree & Moray, Rashmy, 2019. "Implication of Technology on Economic Progress of Farmers: A Case of India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 9(02), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342216
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342216/files/Implication%20of%20Technology%20on%20Economic%20Progress%20of%20Farmers%20A%20Case%20of%20India.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiptot, Evelyne & Hebinck, Paul & Franzel, Steven & Richards, Paul, 2007. "Adopters, testers or pseudo-adopters? Dynamics of the use of improved tree fallows by farmers in western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 509-519, May.
    2. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2010. "Microeconomics of Technology Adoption," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 395-424, September.
    3. Restuccia, Diego & Yang, Dennis Tao & Zhu, Xiaodong, 2008. "Agriculture and aggregate productivity: A quantitative cross-country analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 234-250, March.
    4. Wolfert, Sjaak & Ge, Lan & Verdouw, Cor & Bogaardt, Marc-Jeroen, 2017. "Big Data in Smart Farming – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 69-80.
    5. Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman & Muñoz-Rodríguez, Manrrubio & Santoyo-Cortés, Horacio & Aguilar-Ávila, Jorge & Klerkx, Laurens, 2015. "Information networks that generate economic value: A study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 122-132.
    6. Jenny C. Aker & Isaac M. Mbiti, 2010. "Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 207-232, Summer.
    7. Barnes, A.P. & Soto, I. & Eory, V. & Beck, B. & Balafoutis, A. & Sánchez, B. & Vangeyte, J. & Fountas, S. & van der Wal, T. & Gómez-Barbero, M., 2019. "Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 163-174.
    8. Kijima, Yoko & Otsuka, Keijiro & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2011. "An Inquiry into Constraints on a Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of NERICA Rice in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 77-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David van der Woude & Gilmer Yovani Castro Nieto & Maria Andreina Moros Ochoa & Carolina Llorente Portillo & Anderson Quintero, 2025. "Artificial intelligence in biocapacity and ecological footprint prediction in Latin America and the Caribbean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 22925-22946, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanishree Pabalkar & Rashmy Moray, 2019. "Implication of technology on economic progress of farmers: a case of India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 179-193, December.
    2. Tran, Duc Thanh & Dieu Duong, My Thi & Hoang, Hung Gia, 2025. "Perception and factors affecting farmers’ adoption of smart agriculture in Vietnam: Implications for extension strategies," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    3. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Kazushi Takahashi & Rie Muraoka & Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    5. Ayanwale, Adeolu & Kehinde, Ayodeji D., 2025. "Determinants of use of digital innovation and its impact on land acquisition and food security among farming households in Nigeria," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    6. Kasirye, Ibrahim, 2013. "Constraints to Agricultural Technology Adoption in Uganda: Evidence from the 2005/06-2009/10 Uganda National Panel Survey," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(02), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Apoorv Gupta & Jacopo Ponticelli & Andrea Tesei, 2020. "Language Barriers, Technology Adoption and Productivity: Evidence from Agriculture in India," NBER Working Papers 27192, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Smits, Joeri & Sun, Qigang, 2020. "Contract structure, time preference, and technology adoption," GLO Discussion Paper Series 633, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Robert Finger, 2023. "Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1277-1309.
    11. Ingram, Julie & Maye, Damian & Bailye, Clive & Barnes, Andrew & Bear, Christopher & Bell, Matthew & Cutress, David & Davies, Lynfa & de Boon, Auvikki & Dinnie, Liz & Gairdner, Julian & Hafferty, Caitl, 2022. "What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Oksana Hrynevych & Miguel Blanco Canto & Mercedes Jiménez García, 2022. "Tendencies of Precision Agriculture in Ukraine: Disruptive Smart Farming Tools as Cooperation Drivers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Emily Duncan & Alesandros Glaros & Dennis Z. Ross & Eric Nost, 2021. "New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 1181-1199, December.
    14. Valmor Comim Junior & Sibele Recco Rosso Comim & Sadia Hussain Vehniwal, 2021. "The impact of the technology on the food industrial production: a case study of Brazil," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(4), pages 123-142.
    15. Apoorv Gupta & Jacopo Ponticelli & Andrea Tesei, 2019. "Technology Adoption and Access to Credit via Mobile Phones," Working Papers 892, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. Parra-López, Carlos & Reina-Usuga, Liliana & Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo & Carmona-Torres, Carmen, 2024. "Designing policies to promote the adoption of digital phytosanitation towards sustainability: The case of the olive sector in Andalusia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    17. Haenssgen, Marco J., 2018. "The struggle for digital inclusion: Phones, healthcare, and marginalisation in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 358-374.
    18. Arouna Kouandou & Rawaa Laajimi, 2025. "Does mobile banking matter for the adoption of modern agricultural technology? Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(2), March.
    19. Madhu Khanna, 2021. "Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Sector: Pathways, Drivers and Policy Implications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1221-1242, December.
    20. Ghali, Mohamed & Ben Arfa, Nejla & Justinia, Giffona & Di Bianco, Soazig & Saili, Abdul Rahman, 2026. "Adoption of digital tools in french beef cattle, pig, and vegetable farming: A mixed-methods analysis of motives, barriers, and structural determinants," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.