IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating vegetables in push-pull technology: gendered preferences of smallholder farmers in western Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Ouya, FO
  • Pittchar, JO
  • Chidawanyika, F
  • Kahn, ZR

Abstract

Transformative rural smallholder agriculture addressing biophysical constraints requires farmer-led innovations for increased technology adoption. Following the need to further intensify the cereal push-pull technology (PPT) for pest and weed control through integration with vegetables, we conducted surveys to determine suitable vegetables across three different counties in Kenya namely Homabay, Siaya, and Trans-Nzoia. Farming in these areas is predominantly maize based and introducing vegetables to the system will improve household food and nutritional security, together with income. A systematic random sampling method was used to sample a total of 124 smallholder farmers who were interviewed during field days where farmer awareness of technology was mobilised. Descriptive results showed kale (47%) and black nightshade (30%) were the most preferred high-value vegetables for integration into push-pull plots in these regions. This was followed by cowpea (15%), onion (6%) and tomato (2%) underlying the wide range of farmer preferences and priorities. There were also gender differences in vegetable preferences with men preferring capital intensive and high value vegetables, while women preferred traditional vegetables. Results from multinomial logit model revealed that age of the farmer, education level, gender, and farming experience were determinants of smallholder farmers’ vegetable preferences for integration into the PPT plots. The contribution of these determinants to farmer preferences varied across different vegetables where the contribution of the market value of the vegetable in selection diminished with while the effect of farmers’ age. Overall, male farmers preferred capital-intensive and market-oriented vegetables in compared to their female counterparts. We conclude that gender and geographic location play a pivotal role in farmers` crop selection for integration in the PPT. Targeted awareness creation pathways accounting for these factors will be critical for wider adoption of the PPT.

Suggested Citation

  • Ouya, FO & Pittchar, JO & Chidawanyika, F & Kahn, ZR, 2024. "Integrating vegetables in push-pull technology: gendered preferences of smallholder farmers in western Kenya," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 24(01), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340615
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340615/files/Ouya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kassie, Menale & Stage, Jesper & Diiro, Gracious & Muriithi, Beatrice & Muricho, Geoffrey & Ledermann, Samuel T. & Pittchar, Jimmy & Midega, Charles & Khan, Zeyaur, 2018. "Push–pull farming system in Kenya: Implications for economic and social welfare," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 186-198.
    2. Murage, A.W. & Midega, C.A.O. & Pittchar, J.O. & Khan, Zeyaur R., 2013. "Potential uptake determinants of climate-smart push-pull technology in drier agro-ecological zones of eastern Africa," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 161511, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    3. Kazushi Takahashi & Rie Muraoka & Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    4. Duncan Cheruiyot & Charles A.O. Midega & Jimmy O. Pittchar & John A. Pickett & Zeyaur R. Khan, 2020. "Farmers’ Perception and Evaluation of Brachiaria Grass ( Brachiaria spp.) Genotypes for Smallholder Cereal-Livestock Production in East Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Timothy R. Silberg & Robert B. Richardson & Maria Claudia Lopez, 2020. "Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(2), pages 269-283, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kharaishvili, Eter & Aduashvili, Lela, 2024. "Competition in the vegetable market and challenges for the industry: a bibliometric analysis of dominant publications," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(3), September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellinor Isgren & Yann Clough & Alice Murage & Elina Andersson, 2023. "Are agricultural extension systems ready to scale up ecological intensification in East Africa? A literature review with particular attention to the Push-Pull Technology (PPT)," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1399-1420, October.
    2. Bairagi, Subir & Bhandari, Humnath & Kumar Das, Subrata & Mohanty, Samarendu, 2021. "Flood-tolerant rice improves climate resilience, profitability, and household consumption in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Menale Kassie & Zewdu Abro & Tesfamicheal Wossen & Samuel T. Ledermann & Gracious Diiro & Shifa Ballo & Lulseged Belayhun, 2020. "Integrated Health Interventions for Improved Livelihoods: A Case Study in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Sandile Jason Mnikathi & Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo & Ojo Temitope & Mjabuliseni Simon Cloapas Ngidi, 2025. "Participation of Emerging Commercial Farmers in the Strategic Private-Sector Investment Interventions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Jinyang Cai & Yu Hong & Meifang Zhou & Ruifa Hu & Fengxiang Ding, 2023. "Farmer field school participation and exit decisions in hog production: A case study from Beijing," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 549-563, March.
    6. Xiao Liu & Zhenyu Wang & Xiaoyan Han, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Mediating Effects Based on Ecological Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Jacques Fils Pierre & Luis Latournerie-Moreno & René Garruña-Hernández & Krista L. Jacobsen & Carrie A. M. Laboski & Lucila de Lourdes Salazar-Barrientos & Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, 2021. "Farmer Perceptions of Adopting Novel Legumes in Traditional Maize-Based Farming Systems in the Yucatan Peninsula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Christiaensen, Luc & Rutledge, Zachariah & Taylor, J. Edward, 2020. "The Future of Work in Agriculture - Some Reflections," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 32012537, The World Bank.
    9. Francesco Cordaro & Alain Desdoigts, 2021. "Bounded Rationality, Social Capital and Technology Adoption in Family Farming: Evidence from Cocoa-Tree Crops in Ivory Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Desalegn A. Gugissa & Zewdu Abro & Tadele Tefera, 2022. "Achieving a Climate-Change Resilient Farming System through Push–Pull Technology: Evidence from Maize Farming Systems in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Kajisa, Kei & Vu, Trang Thu, 2023. "The importance of farm management training for the African rice Green Revolution: Experimental evidence from rainfed lowland areas in Mozambique," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Suswadi & Irawan, Norbertus Citra, 2023. "Digital Transformation of Agricultural Extension in Indonesia: A Comprehensive Analysis," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(4), December.
    13. Mekonnen, Dawit K. & Yimam, Seid & Arega, Tiruwork & Matheswaran, Karthikeyan & Schmitter, Petra M.V., 2022. "Relatives, neighbors, or friends: Information exchanges among irrigators on new on-farm water management tools," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Kassie, Menale & Fisher, Monica & Muricho, Geoffrey & Diiro, Gracious, 2020. "Women’s empowerment boosts the gains in dietary diversity from agricultural technology adoption in rural Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Le, Thi Quynh Anh & Shimamura, Yasuharu & Yamada, Hiroyuki, 2020. "Information acquisition and the adoption of a new rice variety towards the development of sustainable agriculture in rural villages in Central Vietnam," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    16. Antoinette Simpah Anim-Jnr & Prince Sasu & Christine Bosch & Faith Philemon Mabiki & Yaw Oppong Frimpong & Mohammad Naushad Emmambux & Henry Michael Rivers Greathead, 2023. "Sustainable Small Ruminant Production in Low- and Middle-Income African Countries: Harnessing the Potential of Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Yingjie Wang & Huachun Wang & Tian Fu, 2024. "Can social networks facilitate smallholders’ decisions to adopt climate-smart agriculture technologies? A three-level meta-analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Sadick Mohammed & Awudu Abdulai, 2022. "Do Egocentric information networks influence technical efficiency of farmers? Empirical evidence from Ghana," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 109-128, December.
    19. Jean-Marc Blazy & M’hand Fares & Alban Thomas, 2025. "Are less polluting and synergistic farming technologies complementary?," Post-Print hal-05008165, HAL.
    20. Sanjay Kumar SINGH & Vijay Lakshmi SINGH, 2023. "Internet diffusion in India: A study based on Growth Curve modelling," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 29-42, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.