IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i4p520-d788096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stubble Quality of Wheat Grown under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, and Effects of Stubble on the Fermentation Profile of Grazing Ewes’ Ruminal Fluid

Author

Listed:
  • Hajer Guesmi

    (Ecosystems and Aquatic Resources Research Unit Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia (INAT), University of Carthage, 43 Ch. Nicolle Street, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

  • Cyrine Darej

    (Ecosystems and Aquatic Resources Research Unit Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia (INAT), University of Carthage, 43 Ch. Nicolle Street, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

  • Piebiep Goufo

    (Center for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Salah Ben Youssef

    (Laboratory of Animal Productions and Forages, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Hédi Karray Street, Ariana 2049, Tunisia)

  • Mohamed Chakroun

    (Laboratory of Animal Productions and Forages, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Hédi Karray Street, Ariana 2049, Tunisia)

  • Hichem Ben Salem

    (Laboratory of Animal Productions and Forages, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Hédi Karray Street, Ariana 2049, Tunisia)

  • Henrique Trindade

    (Center for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Nizar Moujahed

    (Ecosystems and Aquatic Resources Research Unit Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia (INAT), University of Carthage, 43 Ch. Nicolle Street, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

Abstract

Conservation practices that involve leaving mulch on the soil are known to increase soil fertility. However, mulch is an important source of feed for ruminant livestock. Accordingly, the trade-offs between mulching and stubble uptake by livestock are currently hot topics in the research field. In this study, a comparison between the quality of stubbles of wheat grown in no-tillage and conventional tillage fields and the rumen fermentation characteristics of Barbarine ewes grazing in the two fields was carried out. Samples were collected four times after wheat grain harvesting. Immediately after harvest, stubble biomass was slightly higher under no-tillage than conventional tillage. The ewes displayed different grazing behavior, with feeding at a higher rate on the conservative stubble than the conventional stubble. This feeding behavior seemed to be an adaptive strategy to offset the decline in the nutritional quality of stubbles from no-tillage-grown wheat. Indeed, dry matter, protein, fiber, and ash contents were lower in stubbles from no-tillage than conventional tillage at the second sampling time. Consequently, the concentration of the volatile fatty acid, propionic acid, was lower in ewes grazing in the conservative plots. However, this feeding behavior did not cause any body weight impairment during the two-month experimental period. At the end of grazing, the no-tillage practice was found to be comparable to the conventional tillage system according to the amount of residue remaining on the soil surface. Therefore, no-tillage could not be used to solve the competition between crops and livestock for residues.

Suggested Citation

  • Hajer Guesmi & Cyrine Darej & Piebiep Goufo & Salah Ben Youssef & Mohamed Chakroun & Hichem Ben Salem & Henrique Trindade & Nizar Moujahed, 2022. "Stubble Quality of Wheat Grown under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, and Effects of Stubble on the Fermentation Profile of Grazing Ewes’ Ruminal Fluid," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:520-:d:788096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wafa Ameur & Aymen Frija & Mohamed Arbi Abdeladhim & Chokri Thabet, 2021. "Patterns of Use of Residue Biomass in Cereal–Sheep Production Systems of North Africa: Case of Tunisia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Martha Swamila & Damas Philip & Adam Meshack Akyoo & Stefan Sieber & Mateete Bekunda & Anthony Anderson Kimaro, 2020. "Gliricidia Agroforestry Technology Adoption Potential in Selected Dryland Areas of Dodoma Region, Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Egon Henrique Horst & Secundino López & Mikael Neumann & Francisco Javier Giráldez & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior, 2020. "Effects of Hybrid and Grain Maturity Stage on the Ruminal Degradation and the Nutritive Value of Maize Forage for Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Duncan Cheruiyot & Charles A.O. Midega & Jimmy O. Pittchar & John A. Pickett & Zeyaur R. Khan, 2020. "Farmers’ Perception and Evaluation of Brachiaria Grass ( Brachiaria spp.) Genotypes for Smallholder Cereal-Livestock Production in East Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. João Serrano & Shakib Shahidian & Eliana Machado & Luís L. Paniagua & Emanuel Carreira & Francisco Moral & Alfredo Pereira & Mário de Carvalho, 2021. "Floristic Composition: Dynamic Biodiversity Indicator of Tree Canopy Effect on Dryland and Improved Mediterranean Pastures," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Baudron, Frédéric & Delmotte, Sylvestre & Corbeels, Marc & Herrera, Juan M. & Tittonell, Pablo, 2015. "Multi-scale trade-off analysis of cereal residue use for livestock feeding vs. soil mulching in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 97-106.
    7. Insa Kühling & Shohrukh Atoev & Dieter Trautz, 2018. "Sustainable Intensification in Dryland Cropping Systems—Perspectives for Adaptions across the Western Siberian Grain Belt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyu Qin & Lan Wang & Jianshe Zhao & Gaifang Zhou & Caihong Li & Liyue Guo & Gaoming Jiang, 2022. "Effects of Straw Mulching Thickness on the Soil Health in a Temperate Organic Vineyard," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martha Swamila & Damas Philip & Adam Meshack Akyoo & Julius Manda & Lutengano Mwinuka & Philip J. Smethurst & Stefan Sieber & Anthony Anderson Kimaro, 2021. "Profitability of Gliricidia-Maize System in Selected Dryland Areas of Dodoma Region, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Shah Fahad & Sangram Bhanudas Chavan & Akash Ravindra Chichaghare & Appanderanda Ramani Uthappa & Manish Kumar & Vijaysinha Kakade & Aliza Pradhan & Dinesh Jinger & Gauri Rawale & Dinesh Kumar Yadav &, 2022. "Agroforestry Systems for Soil Health Improvement and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Egon Henrique Horst & Hajer Ammar & Mohamed Larbi Khouja & Julio Ernesto Vargas & Sonia Andrés & Secundino López, 2022. "In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modulating Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Pushpanjali & Josily Samuel & Prabhat Kumar Pankaj & Konda Srinivas Reddy & Karunakaran Karthikeyan & Ardha Gopala Krishna Reddy & Jagriti Rohit & Kotha Sammi Reddy & Vinod Kumar Singh, 2023. "Fodder Grass Strips: An Affordable Technology for Sustainable Rainfed Agriculture in India," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Egon Henrique Horst & Mikael Neumann, 2022. "Assessing Crop and Corn Silage Profile in Beef Cattle Farms in Southern Brazil: Ten Years’ Results," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Christian Thierfelder & Pauline Chivenge & Walter Mupangwa & Todd S. Rosenstock & Christine Lamanna & Joseph X. Eyre, 2017. "How climate-smart is conservation agriculture (CA)? – its potential to deliver on adaptation, mitigation and productivity on smallholder farms in southern Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 537-560, June.
    7. Wafa Ameur & Aymen Frija & Mohamed Arbi Abdeladhim & Chokri Thabet, 2021. "Patterns of Use of Residue Biomass in Cereal–Sheep Production Systems of North Africa: Case of Tunisia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Egon Henrique Horst & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior & Mikael Neumann & Secundino López, 2021. "Effects of the Harvest Stage of Maize Hybrids on the Chemical Composition of Plant Fractions: An Analysis of the Different Types of Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Dominic White & Niven Winchester, 2023. "Logs or permits? Forestry land use decisions in an emissions trading scheme," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 558-575, October.
    10. Tittonell, Pablo & Gérard, Bruno & Erenstein, Olaf, 2015. "Tradeoffs around crop residue biomass in smallholder crop-livestock systems – What’s next?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 119-128.
    11. Nyangabo V. Musika & James V. Wakibara & Patrick A. Ndakidemi & Anna C. Treydte, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Increasing Illegal Livestock Grazing over Three Decades at Moyowosi Kigosi Game Reserve, Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Assogba, Gildas G.C. & Adam, Myriam & Berre, David & Descheemaeker, Katrien, 2022. "Managing biomass in semi-arid Burkina Faso: Strategies and levers for better crop and livestock production in contrasted farm systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Jiang-Bo Hai & Poe Thinzar Bo & Xiang-Wei Gong & Chun-Juan Liu & Ke Dang & Li-Xin Tian & Rab Nawaz Soomro & Khaing Lin Aung & Bai-Li Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity Stages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Ouya, FO & Pittchar, JO & Chidawanyika, F & Kahn, ZR, 2024. "Integrating Vegetables In Push-Pull Technology: Gendered Preferences Of Smallholder Farmers In Western Kenya," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 24(1), January.
    15. Edwin Rafael Alvarado-Ramírez & Gilberto Ballesteros-Rodea & Abdelfattah Zeidan Mohamed Salem & José Reyes-Hernández & Camelia Alejandra Herrera-Corredor & Javier Hernández-Meléndez & Andrés Gilberto , 2023. "The Impact of Genotype on Chemical Composition, Feeding Value and In Vitro Rumen Degradability of Fresh and Ensiled Forage of Native Maize ( Zea mays L.) from Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Wang, Tongxin & Tang, Xuguang & Zheng, Chen & Gu, Qing & Wei, Jin & Ma, Mingguo, 2018. "Differences in ecosystem water-use efficiency among the typical croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 142-150.
    17. Meine van Noordwijk & Erika Speelman & Gert Jan Hofstede & Ai Farida & Ali Yansyah Abdurrahim & Andrew Miccolis & Arief Lukman Hakim & Charles Nduhiu Wamucii & Elisabeth Lagneaux & Federico Andreotti , 2020. "Sustainable Agroforestry Landscape Management: Changing the Game," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-38, July.
    18. Luedeling, Eike & Smethurst, Philip J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Bayala, Jules & Huth, Neil I. & van Noordwijk, Meine & Ong, Chin K. & Mulia, Rachmat & Lusiana, Betha & Muthuri, Catherine & Sinclair, Ferg, 2016. "Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 51-69.
    19. Anna Wenda-Piesik & Agnieszka Synowiec, 2021. "Productive and Ecological Aspects of Mixed Cropping System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-3, April.
    20. Turmel, Marie-Soleil & Speratti, Alicia & Baudron, Frédéric & Verhulst, Nele & Govaerts, Bram, 2015. "Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 6-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:520-:d:788096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.