IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2153-d1003354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modulating Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production

Author

Listed:
  • Egon Henrique Horst

    (Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas, Grulleros, 24346 León, Spain
    Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain
    Department of Veterinary Medicine, Parana Midwestern State University, Guarapuava 85040-167, PR, Brazil)

  • Hajer Ammar

    (Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Mograne (ESAM) de Mograne, Zaghouan 1121, Tunisia)

  • Mohamed Larbi Khouja

    (Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts (INRGREF), Rue Hédi EL Karray El Menzah IV BP 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia)

  • Julio Ernesto Vargas

    (Ciencias Veterinarias CIENVET Research Team, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No. 26-10, Manizales 170004, Caldas, Colombia)

  • Sonia Andrés

    (Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas, Grulleros, 24346 León, Spain)

  • Secundino López

    (Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas, Grulleros, 24346 León, Spain
    Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of five eucalyptus species ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis , E. leucoxylon , E. astringens , E. sideroxylon , and E. lehmannii ), harvested in spring, autumn, or winter from two Tunisian arboretums, on in vitro rumen fermentation and methanogenesis. Batch cultures were performed to determine rumen fermentation kinetics and end-product formation after 24 h of incubation. The foliage of the species E. sideroxylon and E. lehmannii showed the greatest digestibility coefficients, whereas E. leucoxylon was the least digestible. Acetate-to-propionate ratio was reduced when E. sideroxylon and E. lehmannii were incubated, and these species were also the most efficient at reducing methane emission. Foliage harvested in winter showed greater digestibility and an increase in the acetate-to-propionate ratio than in other seasons, without an increase in methane emission. Foliage from E. sideroxylon and E. lehmannii showed a potential to decrease enteric methane production without depressing effects on ruminal fermentation. In vivo studies would be necessary to conclusively validate these effects as the first step towards proposing the inclusion of eucalyptus leaves in ruminant diets.

Suggested Citation

  • Egon Henrique Horst & Hajer Ammar & Mohamed Larbi Khouja & Julio Ernesto Vargas & Sonia Andrés & Secundino López, 2022. "In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modulating Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2153-:d:1003354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valiollah Palangi & Akbar Taghizadeh & Soheila Abachi & Maximilian Lackner, 2022. "Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Egon Henrique Horst & Secundino López & Mikael Neumann & Francisco Javier Giráldez & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior, 2020. "Effects of Hybrid and Grain Maturity Stage on the Ruminal Degradation and the Nutritive Value of Maize Forage for Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajer Guesmi & Cyrine Darej & Piebiep Goufo & Salah Ben Youssef & Mohamed Chakroun & Hichem Ben Salem & Henrique Trindade & Nizar Moujahed, 2022. "Stubble Quality of Wheat Grown under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, and Effects of Stubble on the Fermentation Profile of Grazing Ewes’ Ruminal Fluid," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Egon Henrique Horst & Mikael Neumann, 2022. "Assessing Crop and Corn Silage Profile in Beef Cattle Farms in Southern Brazil: Ten Years’ Results," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Egon Henrique Horst & Valter Harry Bumbieris Junior & Mikael Neumann & Secundino López, 2021. "Effects of the Harvest Stage of Maize Hybrids on the Chemical Composition of Plant Fractions: An Analysis of the Different Types of Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Jiang-Bo Hai & Poe Thinzar Bo & Xiang-Wei Gong & Chun-Juan Liu & Ke Dang & Li-Xin Tian & Rab Nawaz Soomro & Khaing Lin Aung & Bai-Li Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity Stages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Edwin Rafael Alvarado-Ramírez & Gilberto Ballesteros-Rodea & Abdelfattah Zeidan Mohamed Salem & José Reyes-Hernández & Camelia Alejandra Herrera-Corredor & Javier Hernández-Meléndez & Andrés Gilberto , 2023. "The Impact of Genotype on Chemical Composition, Feeding Value and In Vitro Rumen Degradability of Fresh and Ensiled Forage of Native Maize ( Zea mays L.) from Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2153-:d:1003354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.