IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6458-d1701825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Technological Innovations and Sustainable Practices to Abate Methane Emissions from Livestock: A Comprehensive Review

Author

Listed:
  • Amr S. Morsy

    (Livestock Research Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab, P.O. Box 21934, Alexandria 21934, Egypt)

  • Yosra A. Soltan

    (Department of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Aflaton St., El-Shatby, P.O. Box 21545, Alexandria 21526, Egypt)

  • Waleed Al-Marzooqi

    (Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 34, Al-Khod 123, Oman)

  • Hani M. El-Zaiat

    (Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 34, Al-Khod 123, Oman)

Abstract

Livestock farming is a vital component of global food security, yet it remains a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane (CH 4 ), which has a global warming potential 28 times greater than carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge surrounding the sources, biological mechanisms, and mitigation strategies related to CH 4 emissions from ruminant livestock. We first explore the process of methanogenesis within the rumen, detailing the role of methanogenic archaea and the environmental factors influencing CH 4 production. A thorough assessment of both direct and indirect methods used to quantify CH 4 emissions is presented, including in vitro techniques (e.g., syringe method, batch culture, RUSITEC), in vivo techniques (e.g., respiration chambers, Greenfeed, laser CH 4 detectors), and statistical modeling approaches. The advantages and limitations of each method are critically analyzed in terms of accuracy, cost, feasibility, and applicability to different farming systems. We then examine a wide range of mitigation strategies, organized into four core pillars: (1) animal and feed management (e.g., genetic selection, pasture quality improvement), (2) diet formulation (e.g., feed additives such as oils, tannins, saponins, and seaweed), (3) rumen manipulation (e.g., probiotics, ionophores, defaunation, vaccination), and (4) manure management practices and policy-level interventions. These strategies are evaluated not only for their environmental impact but also for their economic and practical viability in diverse livestock systems. By integrating technological innovations with sustainable agricultural practices, this review highlights pathways to reduce CH 4 emissions while maintaining animal productivity. It aims to support decision-makers, researchers, and livestock producers in the global effort to transition toward climate-smart, low-emission livestock farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Amr S. Morsy & Yosra A. Soltan & Waleed Al-Marzooqi & Hani M. El-Zaiat, 2025. "Integrating Technological Innovations and Sustainable Practices to Abate Methane Emissions from Livestock: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6458-:d:1701825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valiollah Palangi & Akbar Taghizadeh & Soheila Abachi & Maximilian Lackner, 2022. "Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Bożena Króliczewska & Ewa Pecka-Kiełb & Jolanta Bujok, 2023. "Strategies Used to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: Controversies and Issues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erica Hargety Kimei & Devotha G. Nyambo & Neema Mduma & Shubi Kaijage, 2024. "Review of Sources of Uncertainty and Techniques Used in Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dobroslava Bujňáková & Katarína Kucková & Zora Váradyová & Iveta Plachá & Viola Strompfová & Jan Bohm & Lenka Micenková & Klaudia Čobanová, 2023. "Effects of Dietary Zinc and/or an Herbal Mixture on Intestinal Microbiota and Barrier Integrity in Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Egon Henrique Horst & Hajer Ammar & Mohamed Larbi Khouja & Julio Ernesto Vargas & Sonia Andrés & Secundino López, 2022. "In Vitro Screening of the Foliage of Eucalyptus Species Harvested in Different Seasons for Modulating Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Roni Pazla & Antonius Antonius & Zaitul Ikhlas & Anuraga Jayanegara & Laily Rinda Ardani & Maureen Chrisye Hadiatry & Jumjunidang Jumjunidang & Tri Budiyanti & Firsoni Firsoni & Ardinal Ardinal & Kasm, 2025. "The potential of tannin from Sonneratia alba fruit in defaunation of rumen protozoa and reducing methane gas production: An approach to increase livestock digestive efficiency," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 223-233.
    5. Federico Infascelli & Nadia Musco & Daria Lotito & Eleonora Pacifico & Sara Matuozzo & Fabio Zicarelli & Piera Iommelli & Raffaella Tudisco & Pietro Lombardi, 2023. "The “Noble Method ® ”: A One Health Approach for a Sustainable Improvement in Dairy Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Kelechi A. Ike & Oludotun O. Adelusi & Joel O. Alabi & Lydia K. Olagunju & Michael Wuaku & Chika C. Anotaenwere & Deborah O. Okedoyin & DeAndrea Gray & Peter A. Dele & Kiran Subedi & Ahmed E. Kholif &, 2024. "Effects of Different Essential Oil Blends and Fumaric Acid on In Vitro Fermentation, Greenhouse Gases, Nutrient Degradability, and Total and Molar Proportions of Volatile Fatty Acid Production in a To," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6458-:d:1701825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.